Google releases August 2025 spam update

Google released its August 2025 spam update today, the company announced at 12:05 p.m. This is Google’s first announced algorithm update since the June 2025 core update. It is Google’s first spam update of 2025 and the first since December.

Timing. Google called this a “normal spam update” and it will take a “few weeks” to finish rolling out.

The announcement. Google announced:

  • “Today we released the August 2025 spam update. It may take a few weeks to complete. This is a normal spam update, and it will roll out for all languages and locations. We’ll post on the Google Search Status Dashboard when the rollout is done.”

Previous spam updates. Before today, Google’s last spam update was released Dec. 19 and finished rolling out Dec. 26; it was more volatile than the June 2024 spam update, which was released June 20, 2024 and completed rolling out June 27, 2024.

Why we care. This is the first Google algorithm update since the June 2025 core update. It’s unclear what type of spam this update is targeting, but if you see any ranking or traffic changes in the next few weeks, it could be due to this update.

Read more at Read More

ChatGPT’s answers came from Google Search after all: Report

ChatGPT Google unmasking

Multiple tests have suggested ChatGPT is using Google Search. Well, a new report seems to confirm ChatGPT is indeed using Google Search data.

  • OpenAI quietly used (and may still be using) a Google Search scraping service to power ChatGPT’s answers on real-time topics like news, sports, and finance, according to The Information.

The details. OpenAI used SerpApi, an 8-year-old scraping firm, to extract Google results.

  • Google has reportedly long tried to block SerpApi’s crawler, though it’s unclear how effective those efforts have been.
  • Other SerpApi customers reportedly include Meta, Apple, and Perplexity.

Zoom out. This revelation contrasts with OpenAI’s public stance that ChatGPT search relies on its own crawler, Microsoft Bing, and licensed publisher data.

Meanwhile. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently dismissed Google Search, saying:

  • “I don’t use Google anymore. I legitimately cannot tell you the last time I did a Google search.” 

Well, based on this news, it seems like he probably is using Google Search all the time within his own product.

Why we care. Google’s search index remains the foundation of online discovery – so much so that even its biggest AI search rival appears to be using it to partially power ChatGPT. This is yet another reminder that SEO isn’t going anywhere just yet. If Google’s results are valuable to OpenAI, they remain essential for driving visibility, traffic, and business outcomes.

The report. OpenAI Is Challenging Google—While Using Its Search Data (subscription required)

Read more at Read More

Historic recurrence in search: Why AI feels familiar and what’s next

Historic recurrence in search- Why AI feels familiar and what’s next

Historic recurrence is the idea that patterns repeat over time, even if the details differ.

In digital marketing, change is the only constant.

Over the last 30 years, we’ve seen nonstop shifts and transformations in platforms and tactics.

Search, social, and mobile have each gone through their own waves of evolution. 

But AI represents something bigger – not just another tactic, but a fundamental shift in how people research, evaluate, and buy products and services.

Estimates vary, but Gartner projects that AI-driven search could account for 25% of search volume by the end of 2026.

I suspect the true share will be much higher as Google weaves AI deeper into its results.

For digital marketers, it can feel like we need a crystal ball to predict what’s next. 

While we don’t have magical foresight, we do have the next best thing: lessons from the past.

This article looks back at the early days of search, how user behavior evolved alongside technology, and what those patterns can teach us as we navigate the AI era.

The early days: Wild and wonderful queries

If you remember the early web – AltaVista, Lycos, Yahoo, Hotbot – search was a free-for-all. 

People typed in long, rambling queries, sometimes entire sentences, other times just a few random words that “felt” right.

There were no search suggestions, no “people also ask,” and no autocorrect. 

It was a simpler time, often summed up as “10 blue links.”

Google Search - 10 blue links

Searchers had to experiment, refine, and iterate on their own, and the variance in query wording was huge.

For marketers, that meant opportunity. 

You could capture traffic in all sorts of unexpected ways simply by having relevant pages indexed.

Back then, SEO was, in large part, about one thing: existing in the index.

Dig deeper: A guide to Google: Origins, history and key moments in search

Google’s rise: From exploration to efficiency

Anyone working in digital marketing in the early 2000s will remember. 

From Day 1, Google felt different. The quality of its results was markedly better.

Then came Google Suggest in 2008, quietly changing the game. 

Suddenly, you didn’t have to finish typing your thought. Google would complete it for you, based on the most common searches.

Research from Moz and others at the time showed that autocomplete reduced query length and variance. 

People defaulted to Google’s suggestions because it was faster and easier.

This marked a significant shift in our behavior as searchers. We moved from sprawling, exploratory queries to shorter, more standardized ones.

It’s not surprising. When something can be achieved with less effort, human nature drives us toward the path of least resistance.

Once again, technology had changed how we search and find information.

Mobile, voice, and the second compression

The shift to mobile accelerated this compression.

Tiny keyboards and on-the-go contexts meant people typed as little as possible.

Autocomplete, voice input, and “search as you type” all encouraged brevity.

At the same time, Google kept rolling out features that answered questions directly, creating a blended, multi-contextual SERP.

The cumulative effect? Search behavior became more predictable and uniform.

For marketers running Google Ads or tracking performance in Google Analytics and Search Console, this shift came with another challenge: less data. 

Long-tail keywords shrank, while most traffic and budget concentrated on a smaller set of high-volume terms.

Once again, our search behavior – and the insights we could glean from it – had evolved.

Zero-click search and the walled garden

By the late 2010s, zero-click searches were on the rise. 

Google – and even social platforms – wanted to keep users inside their ecosystems.

More and more questions were answered directly in the search results. 

Search got smarter, and shorter queries could deliver more refined results thanks to personalization and past interactions.

Google started doing everything for us.

Search for a flight? You’d see Google Flights.

A restaurant? Google Maps. 

A product? Google Shopping. 

Information? YouTube

You get the picture.

For businesses built on organic traffic, this shift was disruptive. 

But for users, it felt seamless – arguably a better experience, even if it created new challenges for optimizers.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


Quality vs. brevity

This shift worked – until it didn’t. 

One common complaint today is that search results feel worse

It’s a complicated issue to unpack. 

  • Have search results actually gotten worse? 
  • Or are the results as good as ever, but the underlying sites have declined in quality?

It’s tricky to call. 

What is certain is that as traffic declined, many sites got more aggressive – adding more ads, more pop-ups, and sneakier lead gen CTAs to squeeze more value from fewer clicks.

The search results themselves have also become a bewildering mix of ads, organic listings, and SERP features. 

To deliver better results from shorter queries, search engines have had to guess at intent while still sending enough clicks to advertisers and publishers to keep the ecosystem running.

And as traffic-starved publishers got more desperate, user experience took a nosedive. 

Anyone who has had to scroll through a food blogger’s life story – while dodging pop-ups and auto-playing ads – just to get to a recipe knows how painful this can be.

It’s this chaotic landscape that, in part, has driven the move to answer engines like ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs). 

People are simply tired of panning for gold in the search results.

The AI era: From compression back to conversation

Up to this point, the pattern has been clear: the average query length kept getting shorter.

But AI is changing the game again, and the query-length pendulum is now swinging sharply in the opposite direction.

Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google’s own AI Mode are making it normal to type or speak longer, more detailed questions again.

We can now:

  • Ask questions instead of searching for keywords. 
  • Refine queries conversationally. 
  • Ask follow-ups without starting over. 

And as users, we can finally skip the over-optimized lead gen traps that have made the web a worse place overall.

Here’s the key point: we’ve gone from mid-length, varied queries in the early days, to short, refined queries over the last 12 years or so, and now to full, detailed questions in the AI era.

The way we seek information has changed once more.

We’re no longer just searching for sources of information. We’re asking detailed questions to get clear, direct answers.

And as AI becomes more tightly integrated into Google over the coming months and years, this shift will continue to reshape how we search – or, more accurately, how we question – Google.

Dig deeper: SEO in an AI-powered world: What changed in just a year

AI and search: Google playing catch-up

Google was a little behind the AI curve.

ChatGPT launched in late 2022 to massive buzz and unprecedented adoption.

Google’s AI Overviews – frankly underwhelming by comparison – didn’t roll out until mid-2024. 

After launching in the U.S. in mid-June and the U.K. in late July 2025, Google’s full AI Mode is now available in 180 countries and territories around the world.

Now, we can ask more detailed, multi-part questions and get thorough answers – without battling through the lead gen traps that clutter so many websites.

The reality is simple: this is a better system.

This is progress.

Want to know the best way to boil an egg – and whether the process changes for eggs stored in the fridge versus at room temperature? Just ask.

Google will often decide if an AI Overview is helpful and generate it on the fly, considering both parts of your question.

  • What is the best way to boil an egg?
  • Does it differ if they are from the fridge?

The AI Overview answers the question directly. 

And if you want to keep going, you can click the bold “Dive deeper in AI Mode” button to continue the conversation.

Dive deeper in AI Mode

Inside AI Mode, you get streamlined, conversational answers to questions that traditional search could answer – just without the manual trawling or the painfully over-optimized, pop-up-heavy recipe sites.

From shorter queries to shorter journeys

Stepping back, we can see how behavior is shifting – and how it ties to human nature’s tendency to seek the path of least resistance.

The “easy” option used to be entering short queries and wading through an increasingly complex mix of results to find what you needed.

Now, the path of least resistance is to put in a bit more effort upfront – asking a longer, more refined question – and let the AI do the heavy lifting.

A search for the best steak restaurant nearby once meant seven separate queries and reviewing over 100 sites. That’s a lot of donkey work you can now skip.

It’s a subtle shift: slightly more work up front, but a far smoother journey in return.

This change also aligns with a classic computing principle: GIGO – garbage in, garbage out. 

A more refined, context-rich question gives the system better input, which produces a more useful, accurate output.

Historic recurrence: The pattern revealed

Looking back, it’s clear there’s a repeating cycle in how technology shapes search behavior.

The early web (1990s)

  • Behavior: Long, experimental, often clumsy queries.
  • Why: No guidance, poor relevance, and lots of trial-and-error.
  • Marketing lesson: Simply having relevant content was often enough to capture traffic.

Google + Autocomplete (2000s)

  • Behavior: Queries got shorter and more standardized.
  • Why: Google Suggest and smarter algorithms nudged users toward the most common phrases.
  • Marketing lesson: Keyword targeting became more focused, with heavier competition around fewer, high-volume terms.

Mobile and voice era (2010s–early 2020s)

  • Behavior: Even shorter, highly predictable queries.
  • Why: Tiny keyboards, voice assistants, and SERP features that answered questions directly.
  • Marketing lesson: The long tail collapsed into clusters. Zero-click searches rose. Winning visibility meant optimizing for snippets and structured data.

AI conversation era (2023–present)

  • Behavior: Longer, natural-language queries return – now in back-and-forth conversations.
  • Why: Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity encourage refinement, context, and multi-step questions.
  • Marketing lesson: It’s no longer about just showing up. It’s about being the best answer – authoritative, helpful, and easy for AI to surface.

Technology drives change

The key takeaway is that technology drives changes in how people ask questions.

And tactically, we’ve come full circle – closer to the early days of search than we’ve been in years.

Despite all the doom and gloom around SEO, there’s real opportunity in the AI era for those who adapt.

What this means for SEO, AEO, LLMO, GEO – and beyond

The environment is changing.

Technology is reshaping how we seek information – and how we expect answers to be delivered.

Traditional search engine results are still important. Don’t abandon conventional SEO.

But now, we also need to optimize for answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Mode.

That means developing deeper insight into your customer segments and fully understanding the journey from awareness to interest to conversion. 

  • Talk to your customers. 
  • Run surveys. 
  • Reach out to those who didn’t convert and ask why. 

Then weave those insights into genuinely helpful content that can be found, indexed, and surfaced by the large language models powering these new platforms.

It’s a brave new world – but an incredibly exciting one to be part of.

Read more at Read More

How to tell if Google Ads automation helps or hurts your campaigns

How to tell if Google Ads automation helps or hurts your campaigns

Smart BiddingPerformance Max, and responsive search ads (RSAs) can all deliver efficiency, but only if they’re optimizing for the right signals.

The issue isn’t that automation makes mistakes. It’s that those mistakes compound over time.

Left unchecked, that drift can quietly inflate your CPAs, waste spend, or flood your pipeline with junk leads.

Automation isn’t the enemy, though. The real challenge is knowing when it’s helping and when it’s hurting your campaigns.

Here’s how to tell.

When automation is actually failing

These are cases where automation isn’t just constrained by your inputs. It’s actively pushing performance in the wrong direction.

Performance Max cannibalization

The issue

PMax often prioritizes cheap, easy traffic – especially branded queries or high-intent searches you intended to capture with Search campaigns. 

Even with brand exclusions, Google still serves impressions against brand queries, inflating reported performance and giving the illusion of efficiency. 

On top of that, when PMax and Search campaigns overlap, Google’s auction rules give PMax priority, meaning carefully built Search campaigns can lose impressions they should own.

A clear sign this is happening: if you see Search Lost IS (rank) rising in your Search campaigns while PMax spend increases, it’s likely PMax is siphoning traffic.

Recommendation

Use brand exclusions and negatives in PMax to block queries you want Search to own. 

Segment brand and non-brand campaigns so you can track each cleanly. And to monitor branded traffic specifically, tools like the PMax Brand Traffic Analyzer (by Smarter Ecommerce) can help.

Dig deeper: Performance Max vs. Search campaigns: New data reveals substantial search term overlap

Auto-applied recommendations (AAR) rewriting structure

The issue

AARs can quietly restructure your campaigns without you even noticing. This includes:

  • Adding broad match keywords. 
  • “Upgrading” existing keywords to broader match types.
  • Adding new keywords that are sometimes irrelevant to your targeting.

Google has framed these “optimizations” as efficiency improvements, but the issue is that they can destabilize performance. 

Broad keywords open the door to irrelevant queries, which then can spike CPA and waste budget.

Recommendation

First, opt out of AARs and manually review all recommendations moving forward. 

Second, audit the changes that have already been made by going to Campaigns > Recommendations > Auto Apply > History. 

From there, you can see what change happened on what date, which allows you to go back to your campaign data and see if there are any performance correlations. 

Dig deeper: Top Google Ads recommendations you should always ignore, use, or evaluate

Modeled conversions inflating numbers

The issue

Modeled conversions can climb while real sales or MQLs stay flat. 

For example, you may see a surge in reported leads or purchases in your ads account, but when you look at your CRM, the numbers don’t match up. 

This happens because Google uses modeling to estimate conversions where direct measurement isn’t possible. 

If Google doesn’t have full tracking, it fills gaps by estimating conversions it can’t directly track, based on patterns in observable data. 

When left unchecked, the automation will double down on these patterns (because it assumes they’re correct), wasting budget on traffic that looks good but won’t convert.

Recommendation

Tell the automation what matters most to your business. 

Import offline or qualified conversions (via Enhanced Conversions, manual uploads, or CRM integration). 

This will ensure that Google optimizes for real revenue and not modeled noise.

When automation is boxed in: Reading the signals

Not every warning in Google means automation is failing. 

Sometimes the system is limited by the goals, budget, or inputs you’ve set – and it’s simply flagging that.

These diagnostic signals help you understand when to adjust your setup instead of blaming the algorithm.

Limited statuses (red vs. yellow)

The issue

A Limited status doesn’t always mean your campaign is broken. 

  • If you see a red Limited label, this means your settings are too strict. That could mean that your CPA or ROAS targets are unrealistic, your budget is too low, etc. 
  • Seeing a yellow Limited label is more of a caution sign. It’s usually tied to low volume, limited data, or the campaign is still learning.

Recommendation

If the status is red, loosen constraints gradually: raise your budget and ease up CPA/ROAS targets by 10–15%. 

If the status is yellow, don’t panic. This is Google’s version of telling you that they could use more money, if possible, but it’s not vital to your campaign’s success.

Responsive search ads (RSAs) inputs

The issue

RSAs are built in real-time from the headlines and descriptions you have already provided Google. 

At a minimum, advertisers are required to write 3 headlines with a maximum of 15 (and up to 4 descriptions). The fewer the assets you give the system, the less flexibility it will have. 

On the other hand, if you’re running a small budget and give the RSAs all 15 headlines and 4 descriptions, there is no way Google will be able to collect enough data to figure out which combinations actually work.

The automation isn’t failing with either. You’ve either given it too little information or too much with too little spending. 

Recommendation

Match asset volume to the budget allocated to the campaign. 

  • If you’re unsure, aim to write between 8-10 headlines and 2-4 descriptions.
  • If each headline/description isn’t distinct, don’t use it. 

Conversion reporting lag and attribution issues

The issue

Sometimes, Google Ads reports fewer conversions than your business actually sees. 

This isn’t necessarily an automation failure. It’s often just a matter of when the conversion is counted. 

By default, Google reports conversions on the day of the click, not the day the actual conversion happened. 

That means if you check performance mid-week, you might see fewer conversions than your campaign has actually generated because Google attributes them back to the click date. 

The data usually “catches up” as lagging conversions are processed.

Recommendation

Use the Conversions (by conversion time) column alongside the standard conversion column.

Conversions (by conversion time) column

This helps you separate true performance drops from simple reporting delays. 

If discrepancies persist beyond a few days, investigate the tracking setup or import accuracy. Just don’t assume automation is broken just because of timing gaps.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


Where to look in the Google Ads UI

Automation leaves a clear trail within Google Ads if you know where to look. 

Here are some reports and columns to help spot when automation is drifting.

Bid Strategy report: Top signals 

The issue

The bid strategy report shows some of the signals Smart Bidding relies on when there is enough data. 

The “top signals” can sometimes make sense, and at other times, they can be a bit misleading. 

If the algorithm relies on weak signals (e.g., broad search themes and a lack of first-party data), its optimizations will be weak, too.

Bid Strategy report: Top signals 

Recommendation

Make checking your Top Signals a regular activity. 

If they don’t align with your business, fix the inputs. 

  • Improve conversion tracking.
  • Import offline conversions.
  • Reevaluate search themes.
  • Add customer/remarketing lists.
  • Expand your negative keyword list(s). 

Impression share metrics

The issue

When a campaign underdelivers, it’s tempting to assume automation is failing, but looking at Impression Share (IS) metrics tends to reveal the real bottleneck. 

By looking at Search Lost IS (budget), Search Lost IS (rank), and Absolute Top IS together, you can separate automation problems from structural or competitive ones.

How to use IS metrics as a diagnostic tool.

  • Budget problem
    • High Lost IS (budget) + low Lost IS (rank): Your campaign isn’t struggling. It just doesn’t have enough budget to run properly.
    • Recommendation: Raise the budget or accept capped volume.
  • Targets too aggressive
    • High Lost IS (rank) + low Absolute Top IS: If your Lost IS (rank) is high and your budget is adequate, your CPA/ROAS targets are likely too aggressive, causing Smart Bidding to underbid in auctions.
    • Recommendation: Loosen targets gradually (10-15%).

Scripts to keep automation honest

Scripts give you early warnings so you can step in before wasted spend piles up.

Anomaly detection

  • The issue: Automation can suddenly overspend or underspend when conditions in the marketplace change, but you often won’t notice until reporting lags.
  • Recommendation: Use an anomaly detection script to flag unusual swings in spend, clicks, or conversions so you can investigate quickly.

Query quality (N-gram analysis)

  • The issue: Broad match and PMax can drift into irrelevant themes (“free,” “jobs,” “definition”), wasting budget on low-quality queries.
  • Recommendation: Run an N-gram script to surface recurring poor-quality terms and add them as negatives before automation optimizes toward them.

Budget pacing

  • The issue: Google won’t exceed your monthly cap, but daily spend will be uneven. Pacing scripts help you spot front-loading.
  • Recommendation: A pacing script shows you how spend is distributed so you can adjust daily budgets mid-month or hold back funds when performance is weak.

Turning automation into an asset

Automation rarely fails in dramatic ways – it drifts. 

Your job isn’t to fight it, but to supervise it: 

  • Supply the right signals.
  • Track when it goes off course.
  • Step in before wasted spend compounds.

The diagnostics we covered – impression share, attribution checks, PMax insights, and scripts – help you separate real failures from cases where automation is simply following your inputs.

The key takeaway: automation is powerful, but not self-policing. 

With the right guardrails and oversight, it becomes an asset instead of a liability.

Read more at Read More

Global expansion and hyperlocal focus redefine the next chapter of retail media networks by DoorDash

Retail media networks are projected to be worth $179.5 billion by 2025, but capturing share and achieving long-term success won’t hinge solely on growing their customer base. With over 200 retail media networks now competing for advertiser attention, the landscape has become increasingly complex and crowded. The RMNs that stand out will be those taking a differentiated approach to meeting the evolving needs of advertisers.

The industry’s concentration creates interesting dynamics. While some platforms have achieved significant scale, nearly 70% of RMN buyers cite “complexity in the buying process” as their biggest obstacle. That tension, between explosive growth and operational complexity, is forcing the industry to evolve beyond traditional approaches.

As the landscape matures, which strategies will define the next wave of growth: global expansion, hyperlocal targeting, or both?

The evolution of retail media platforms

To understand where the industry is heading, it’s worth examining how successful platforms are addressing advertisers’ core challenges. Lack of measurement standards across platforms continues to frustrate advertisers who want to compare performance across networks. Manual processes dominate smaller networks, making campaign management inefficient and time-consuming.

At the same time, most retailers lack the digital footprint necessary for standalone success. This has created opportunities for platforms that can solve multiple problems simultaneously: standardization, automation, and scale.

DoorDash represents an interesting case study in this evolution. The platform has built its advertising capabilities around reaching consumers at their moment of local need across multiple categories. With more than 42 million monthly active consumers as of December 2024, DoorDash provides scale and access to high-intent shoppers across various categories spanning restaurants, groceries and retail.

The company’s approach demonstrates how platforms can address advertiser pain points through technology. DoorDash’s recent platform announcement showcases this evolution: the company now serves advertisers with new AI-powered tools and expanded capabilities. Through its acquisition of ad tech platform Symbiosys, a next-generation retail media platform, brands can expand their reach into digital channels, such as search, social, and display, and retailers can extend the breadth of their retail media networks.

Global expansion meets local precision

International expansion presents both opportunities and challenges for retail media networks. Europe’s retail media industry is projected to surpass €31 billion by 2028,. This creates opportunities for networks that can solve the technology puzzle of operating across multiple geographies.

The challenge lies in building platforms that work seamlessly across countries while maintaining local relevance. International expansion requires handling different currencies, regulations, and cultural contexts—capabilities that many networks struggle to develop.

DoorDash’s acquisition of Wolt illustrates how platforms can achieve global scale while maintaining local connections. The integration enables brands to manage campaigns across Europe and the U.S. through a single interface—exactly the kind of operational efficiency that overwhelmed advertisers seek.

The combined entity now operates across more than 30 countries, with DoorDash and Wolt Ads crossing an annualized advertising revenue run rate of more than $1 billion in 2024. What makes this expansion compelling isn’t just the scale—it’s how the integration maintains neighborhood-level precision across diverse geographies.

Wolt has transformed from a food delivery platform into what it describes as a multi-category “shopping mall in people’s pockets.”

The hyperlocal advantage: context beats demographics

Here’s what’s really changing the game: the shift from demographic targeting to contextual precision. Privacy regulations favor contextual targeting over behavioral tracking, but that’s not the only reason smart networks are going hyperlocal.

Location-based intent signals provide dramatically higher conversion probability than traditional demographics. Real-time contextual data—weather patterns, local events, proximity to fulfillment—influences purchase decisions in immediate, actionable ways that broad demographic targeting simply can’t match.

DoorDash built its entire advertising model around this insight, reaching consumers at the exact moment of local need across multiple categories. The platform provides scale and access to high-intent shoppers with contextual precision. A recent innovation that exemplifies this approach is Dayparting for CPG brands, which enables advertisers to target users in their local time zones—a level of time-based precision that distinguishes hyperlocal platforms from broader retail media networks.

In one example, Unilever applied Dayparting to focus on late-night and weekend windows for its ice cream campaigns, aligning ad delivery with peak demand periods. Over a two-week period, 77% of attributed sales were new-to-brand, demonstrating the power of contextual timing in driving incremental reach.

Major brands, including Unilever, Coca-Cola, and Heineken, utilize both DoorDash and Wolt platforms for hyperlocal targeting, proving the model is effective for both endemic and non-endemic advertisers seeking neighborhood-level precision.

Technology evolution: measurement and automation

The technical requirements for next-generation retail media networks extend far beyond basic advertising capabilities. Self-serve functionality has become standard for international geographies—not because it’s trendy, but because manual campaign management doesn’t scale across dozens of countries with different currencies, regulations, and cultural contexts.

Cross-country campaign management requires unified dashboards that manage complexity while maintaining simplicity for advertisers. Automation isn’t optional anymore; it’s necessary to compete with established players who’ve built machine learning into their core operations.

But here’s what’s really transforming measurement: new attribution methodologies that go beyond traditional ROAS. When platforms can integrate fulfillment data with advertising exposure, they enable real-time performance tracking that connects ad spend to actual business outcomes rather than just clicks and impressions.

Progress on standardization continues through IAB guidelines addressing measurement consistency, alongside industry pushes for technical integration standards. The challenge lies in balancing standardization with differentiation—networks need to offer easy integration and consistent measurement while maintaining unique value propositions.

In a move toward addressing advertisers’ need for measurement consistency, DoorDash recognized that restaurant brands valued both click and impression-based attribution for their sponsored listing ads, and recently introduced impression-based attribution and reporting in Ads Manager. This has enabled restaurant brands to gain a deeper understanding of performance and results driven on DoorDash.

Global technology challenges add another layer of complexity: multi-currency transactions, local payment methods, regulatory compliance across countries, and cultural adaptation while maintaining platform consistency. These aren’t afterthoughts for international platforms, they’re core competencies that determine success or failure.

Industry outlook: consolidation and opportunity

Retail media is heading toward consolidation, but not in the way most people expect. Hyperlocal networks are positioned to capture share from undifferentiated RMNs that compete solely on inventory volume. Geographic specialization is becoming a viable alternative to traditional scale-focused approaches.

Simultaneously, community impact measurement is gaining importance for brand strategy. Marketers are discovering that advertising dollars spent on local commerce platforms create multiplier effects—supporting neighborhood businesses and strengthening local economies in ways that traditional e-commerce advertising doesn’t achieve.

The networks that understand this dynamic, that can offer global platform capabilities with genuine local industry expertise, are the ones positioned to define retail media’s next chapter. Success requires technology integration that enables contextual and location-based targeting, plus measurement solutions that prove incrementality beyond traditional metrics.

The path forward

As retail media networks mature, success lies not in choosing between global scale and local relevance, but in achieving both simultaneously. The DoorDash-Wolt combination provides a compelling blueprint, demonstrating how technology platforms can enable international expansion while deepening neighborhood-level connections.

For marketers navigating this evolution, the fundamental question shifts from “where should we advertise?” to “how can we reach consumers at their moment of need?” Networks that answer this effectively—through global reach, hyperlocal precision, or ideally both, will write retail media’s next chapter.Interested to learn more about DoorDash Ads? Get started today.

Read more at Read More

Google Ads expands PMax Channel Reporting to account level

Your guide to Google Ads Smart Bidding

Performance Max (PMax) advertisers just got a major visibility upgrade: Channel Reporting is now available at the account level, not just within individual campaigns.

How it works:

  • View and compare all PMax campaigns in a single reporting overview.
  • Segment by conversion metrics to understand what’s driving results.
  • Identify performance patterns across channels without jumping campaign to campaign.

Why we care. Until now, channel performance data was siloed within each PMax campaign. The new account-level reporting makes it easier to spot trends, compare results, and optimize across campaigns.

The big picture. Google notes that channel data is available for PMax campaigns “at this time” — a phrasing that suggests the feature could expand to other campaign types down the road.

Bottom line. More visibility, less friction. This change gives advertisers a faster, more complete view of PMax performance — and hints at broader reporting upgrades ahead.

First seen. This update was first picked up by Jun von Matt IMPACT’s Head of Google Ads, Thomas Eccel.

Read more at Read More

GEO vs SEO: Understanding the Differences

If you have been working in digital marketing, you already know how much hinges on showing up in search. For years, SEO has been the way to get there. Now, GEO vs SEO is the conversation that matters, because generative AI has introduced a new way for people to get answers.

The rise of generative engine optimization (GEO) does not mean SEO is dead. It means you cannot treat them as the same thing. SEO is about earning visibility in search engine results pages. GEO is about making sure your content shows up inside AI-generated answers.

Marketers who get this right capture attention in both worlds. Everyone else is left wondering why traffic is slipping, even when rankings look fine.

Key Takeaways

  • GEO vs SEO is not either-or. SEO drives visibility in search engines, while GEO ensures your content appears in AI-generated answers.
  • Both GEO and SEO aim to satisfy user intent. High-quality, structured content is the foundation for success with both.
  • The differences matter. SEO measures success in rankings and traffic, while GEO focuses on citations inside AI-driven outputs.
  • E-E-A-T is critical for both. Strong signals of experience, expertise, authority, and trust help improve rankings and AI citations alike.
  • Optimization is ongoing. Neither GEO nor SEO is “set it and forget it.” Both require consistent updates as algorithms and AI models evolve.
  • You need both strategies. Together, they maximize reach across traditional search and generative platforms.

GEO and SEO explained

SEO, or search engine optimization, is the process of improving your site so it ranks higher in search results. It relies on content quality, site structure, backlinks, and technical performance to earn visibility in Google and other engines.

A Google Search for best restaurants in providence, Rhode Island.

GEO, or generative engine optimization, works differently. Instead of chasing rankings in a results page, GEO prepares your content so AI-driven platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews can interpret and cite you in their responses.

A ChatGPT response asking for restaurants in Providence, Rhode Island.

Both share the same end goal: connect your expertise with the people searching for it. The difference is in delivery. SEO surfaces website links. GEO delivers answers.

GEO vs SEO: The Similarities

GEO and SEO share the same mission: get useful, credible content in front of the right audience. The mechanics differ, but the fundamentals overlap in important ways.

Both are built around user intent. You win by matching the question behind the query, not by chasing vague head terms. Clear problem-solution framing and direct answers perform well in search results and inside AI summaries.

Content quality drives outcomes. Original research, step‑by‑step guidance, current stats, and real examples increase usefulness, similar to the example below. Thin copy gets ignored by ranking systems and by generative engines.

Structure increases visibility. Descriptive headings, short paragraphs, ordered lists, and clear tables help crawlers understand content and make it easier for AI models to process and reuse Clean formatting reduces ambiguity and improves the chances your content is surfaced accurately.

E‑E‑A‑T signals matter. Named authors with credentials, transparent sourcing, solid About and Contact pages, and real brand mentions build confidence for search evaluators and increase the likelihood your content is surfaced in AI outputs.

Author profiles on the Neil Patel blog.

Keywords still count. You need the keywords your audience actually uses. Target natural variations, long‑tail questions, and entity terms. Avoid stuffing. Prioritize clarity.

Strong technical foundations help both. Fast load times, mobile readiness, logical internal linking, and clean URLs make content easier to discover and parse. Fix crawl issues before you expect traction anywhere.

Schema and metadata support extraction. FAQ, HowTo, Product, and other relevant types make meaning explicit.

 Clear titles and concise meta descriptions improve interpretation.

Multimedia boosts understanding. Diagrams, short videos, and annotated screenshots clarify complex steps. 

Ensure you include transcripts and alt text so systems can interpret non‑text assets.

Neither is set‑and‑forget. Algorithms and models change. Refresh outdated stats, expand sections that underperform, and retire content that no longer fits searcher needs.

Measurement principles overlap. Track engagement, clarity of answers, and query coverage. For both approaches, the consistent signal is simple: content that helps users is more likely to be surfaced. The good news here is that on the GEO side, we are seeing more tools emerge to track AI platform visibility, such as Profound.

Things to look for in AI tracking tools.

GEO vs SEO: The Differences

Although GEO and SEO share a foundation, the way they operate, and the way you measure success, is very different.

Focus of optimization. SEO is about ranking well in search engine results pages. GEO is about being increasing visibility in AI-generated answers, whether through citations or inclusion in responses. 

Output style. SEO aims to win clicks from a list of website links. GEO focuses on being included in summaries, snippets, or conversational responses in AI-driven platforms. With SEO, visibility is measured in ranking position. With GEO, it is measured in whether your content is referenced or surfaced.

Signals of value. Traditional SEO still leans heavily on backlinks as proof of authority. GEO shifts more weight to content clarity, structured formatting, and topical alignment. Clean HTML, schema markup, and well-labeled sections give AI systems clearer context, making your content easier to interpret and surface. 

Measurement of success. In SEO, key metrics include keyword rankings, organic traffic, and click-through rate. For GEO, success is measured by brand visibility in AI outputs, including citations, mentions in AI results like AI Overviews, and sustained brand presence across AI-driven platforms.

Best practices. SEO requires long-term link building, technical health, and evergreen content. GEO adds new priorities: question-based keyword targeting, multimedia elements that AI can parse, and wider distribution across platforms AI systems draw from for answers.

Think of it this way: SEO gets you discovered. GEO gets you included in the answer. You need both.

How Does GEO Impact SEO?

GEO does not replace SEO, but it is changing how SEO delivers results. Traditional search rankings still matter, yet more searches are ending in AI-driven answers that do not send clicks or traffic to websites.

High rankings used to mean visibility. Now, visibility also depends on whether AI engines surface you in their summaries. That forces your content to be structured in ways AI can easily reuse.

It also changes the kinds of sources search engines value. AI platforms pull heavily from community-driven sites like Reddit and Quora, along with news outlets and trusted publishers.

Reddit queries in Google results.

If your brand is only visible in your own blog, you risk being left out of those AI answers. Expanding into these other ecosystems helps both GEO and SEO.

The takeaway: SEO still builds the foundation. GEO makes sure the foundation carries into AI-driven search.

How To Make GEO and SEO Work Together

The best strategy is not choosing one. It is making them work together.

Start with a solid SEO foundation. Your site still needs clean technical performance, smart keyword targeting, and high-quality content that demonstrates topical authority. 

From there, layer on GEO tactics. Structure content around real questions. It’s no small surprise that when you type in “when should I buy a house?” the Google AI Overview citations align with actual questions.

An AI overview result for "When should I buy a house?"

Add schema where it fits. Include multimedia formats like charts, transcripts, or short videos so AI systems can interpret your work more effectively. 

Do not keep your content siloed, either. Expand your presence to forums, social platforms, and multimedia channels. 

That distribution helps your search everywhere optimization efforts, making sure that you’re appearing on platforms that your audience may be searching on outside of Google. This ties neatly into GEO because it gives AI engines more chances to surface your brand.

The overlap is clear: SEO helps your content get discovered, GEO helps it get included in answers. When you execute both together, you maximize visibility across traditional search and the new wave of AI-driven platforms.

FAQs

What is the difference between GEO and SEO?

SEO focuses on ranking in traditional search results, while GEO focuses on being cited in AI-generated answers from platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews.

Do I need GEO if I already do SEO?

Yes. SEO ensures visibility in search results, but as more searches are now answered directly in AI summaries, GEO helps increase your chances of being included in those responses.

Does GEO replace SEO?

No. GEO builds on a strong SEO foundation. You still need SEO for rankings and discovery. GEO adds an extra layer to make your content usable in AI-driven outputs.

What metrics measure GEO success?

While SEO tracks rankings, organic traffic, and click-through rate, GEO success is measured by citations in AI responses, brand mentions, and visibility across AI-powered platforms.

How can businesses start with GEO?

Begin with your best-performing SEO content. Reformat it with clear headings, FAQ sections, schema markup, and question-based targeting to make it easier for AI engines to interpret and surface in their responses.

Conclusion

The GEO vs SEO debate is not about picking sides. It is about realizing they work together. SEO still drives discovery. GEO ensures your brand is part of the answer.

Ignore GEO, and your rankings may look fine while your traffic keeps sliding. Ignore SEO, and you will not have the authority or structure needed for AI engines to trust you. The opportunity is to combine both into a strategy that covers search engines and AI-driven platforms.

This shift is already showing up in user behavior. Nearly 60% of searches end without a click, a trend driven by zero-click searches and AI summaries. If your content is not built to be cited, you are invisible where people stop their journey.

It also reinforces the importance of semantic search. Both search engines and AI engines are getting better at understanding meaning, not just keywords. Content that clearly explains concepts, uses natural language, and ties ideas together stands a much better chance of being surfaced.

Start small. Update a handful of pages. Track where you appear in AI summaries and search results. Double down on what works.

The marketers who adapt early will not just keep their visibility. They will be the ones AI engines and search engines both continue to cite.

Read more at Read More

SEO vs. GEO, AEO, LLMO: What Marketers Need to Know

If you do any kind of marketing, you’ve probably come across at least one of these acronyms recently:

  • GEO: Generative Engine Optimization
  • AEO: Answer Engine Optimization
  • LLMO: Large Language Model Optimization
  • AIO: Artificial Intelligence Optimization

Here’s the truth:

They all mean essentially the same thing.

But they are subtly different from SEO (search engine optimization). This article will tell you where they’re similar, where they’re different, and what you need to know as a marketer.

SEO vs. Everything Else Explained

There might be shades of nuance between these acronyms, but the goal with all of them is the same. They all aim to optimize your (or your client’s) online presence to appear in more AI responses in tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Mode.

Okay, so if they’re so similar: why the need for all these acronyms in the first place?

Why All the Acronyms?

The main reason we have so many acronyms like GEO, AIO, LLMO, and AEO is that AI optimization in general is still very new. This means people from all corners of marketing have been coming across new concepts, ideas, and techniques at the same time.

Naturally, people call things different names as they try to differentiate themselves from traditional SEO — and all the other new acronyms appearing on the scene.

Why do they do that?

Various reasons:

  • They want to appear to be at the forefront of digital marketing
  • Their bosses have told them they need to do it
  • They’re trying to offer new services in a volatile marketplace

There’s nothing wrong with any of these reasons. But it does make it confusing for the rest of us.

And it’s clear that a lot of people are searching for these new terms:

Semrush – Bulk Keyword Analysis – Acronyms

And the trends over time are clear too, as search demand for these new terms has skyrocketed in the past year:

Google Trends – Interest over time – GEO, AEO, LLM

One term in particular, “AI Optimization,” has really exploded:

Google Trends – Interest over time – GEO, AEO, LLM, AI

Are They Replacing SEO?

Short answer: no.

Can you guess which keyword I blurred out in the first screenshot above?

That’s right: search engine optimization.

Semrush – Bulk Keyword Analysis – Acronyms – Unblurred

More than 40K searches each month. And the acronym “SEO”?

Almost a quarter of a million searches each month in the US alone:

Keyword Overview – SEO – Volume

(The other acronyms aren’t “mainstream” enough to use as a data point here. For example, AEO is American Eagle Outfitters, and GEO can mean a hundred different things.)

Clearly, search volumes don’t tell the whole story, but SEO is definitely still the more popular term right now.

And the Google Trend graph is the final nail in the “Is SEO Dead?” coffin:

Google Trends – Interest over time – GEO, AEO, LLM, AI & SEO

That’s right, search demand for SEO has actually grown over the past year. But you’ll see here that “AI Optimization” is arguably “trendier” right now than SEO.

And that makes sense, because people and businesses are concerned about how to optimize for AI systems. There is a shift in the industry from pure SEO to some form of optimization for the likes of ChatGPT and AI Mode.

Businesses are even hiring for “GEO Experts”:

Google SERP – GEO Jobs

And agencies are pivoting to offer AI search services:

Google SERP – AI optimization services

So what these acronyms are all about is a very real thing. But it’s not a complete revolution when you compare it to search engine optimization.

Quick Summary of SEO vs. GEO/AEO/LLMO/AIO

Here’s what’s actually happening. There are really only two distinct approaches, SEO vs. the rest:

Aspect Classic SEO AI Optimization (GEO/AEO/LLMO/AIO) Insight
Goal Rank high in search results Get cited in AI-generated responses Both matter. Create content that ranks AND gets cited.
How Users Search Keywords and short phrases, like: “email marketing tools” Complete questions and context: “Which email marketing tool is best for a small nonprofit?” Research actual questions your audience asks. Don’t just rely on keywords with high search volume.
Success Metric Click-through traffic to your site Being quoted/referenced by AI Go beyond website visits and start tracking brand mentions across AI tools.
User Journey User clicks > visits your page > converts User gets answer > may never visit your site, may click through for details, or may visit directly later Make your brand memorable through a compelling product, service, or content — even in brief AI mentions.
Content Focus Optimize full pages (titles, headers, meta tags) Create clear, quotable passages that answer specific questions Write self-contained sections. Each paragraph should make sense on its own.
Main Platforms Google, Bing search results ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews You need visibility across all platforms where your audience seeks information.
Key Factors Links and overall authority Citations and brand sentiment Build authority through quality backlinks AND consistent messaging everywhere.
Where Content Lives Primarily on your website Websites, plus YouTube, forums, and social platforms One thoughtful Reddit comment might drive more AI citations than five blog posts.
Measurement Tools Google Analytics, Search Console Brand monitoring tools, AI citation tracking Set up tracking for both classic SEO and AI visibility.

Where They’re Actually the Same (Spoiler: Almost Everything)

Despite the different names, these approaches share most of the same features and tactics:

  • The goal is the same: While visibility is perhaps the word you’ll see associated with success in the AI era, the goal for businesses is still to get more customers and drive revenue. Whether that’s from search engines or ChatGPT, it’s still the bottom-line number that business owners care about.
  • Content quality is paramount: All of these optimization methods prioritize high-quality, authoritative content. Whether you’re targeting Google’s search results or ChatGPT’s responses, you need genuine expertise and accurate information.
  • Structure matters everywhere: Clear headings, logical flow, and well-organized information help both search engines and AI systems understand your content. A messy blog post won’t rank well anywhere.
  • Authority signals are universal: Backlinks, domain authority, and expertise signals matter across all platforms. AI systems often rely on the same trust signals that traditional search engines use (although citations, not just links, matter more for AI optimization).
  • User intent drives everything: Whether someone types a query into Google or asks ChatGPT a question, they want a useful answer. Content that genuinely helps people will generally perform well regardless of the platform.

Where They Actually Differ (The Few Real Distinctions)

The differences between these approaches are smaller than the marketing suggests:

  • Links vs. citations: In traditional SEO, a big driver of your authority and whether you’ll rank is the quality of your backlink profile. In AI optimization, where you’re cited across the web matters more than just the links you have.
  • Traffic vs. citations: The broader business goals are still the same (to get customers and make money). But SEO is clearly more focused on driving traffic while AI optimization is, at least on the surface, about getting cited in AI responses.
  • Response format: Keyword-optimized, long-form content was often the winning strategy for SEO. AI-optimized content focuses on direct, quotable answers to specific questions.
  • Measurement challenges: You can easily track your SEO performance with tools like Google Analytics. Measuring AI visibility requires newer tools and different metrics, and it’s not always possible to accurately map out the customer journey.

But here’s what’s important: you don’t choose between these approaches. A well-optimized piece of content will perform across all these platforms simultaneously.

What This Means for Your Business

Now you know where there is and isn’t overlap between SEO, GEO, AIO, and all the other acronyms.

But what do you actually do with this information?

Content Research Gets More Complex

You can’t just look at keyword search volume anymore. You need to understand what questions people are asking AI systems and what answers those systems are currently providing.

This means your content team needs to research across multiple platforms:

  • Google search results
  • ChatGPT responses
  • Perplexity citations
  • AI Mode and AI Overviews

You need to understand where you’re being cited and where you’re not. But you also need to understand why other sites are being mentioned. This way, you can create content that’s also more likely to get cited.

Writing Becomes Answer-First

Writers need to structure content so AI systems can easily extract quotable segments for their answers.

ChatGPT – Prompt – Backlinko as source

That means:

  • Descriptive subheadings
  • Clear transitions between sections
  • Direct answers early in each section
  • Simple language where possible
  • Short sentences and paragraphs

Editor’s Note: This is one that we feel quite strongly about at Backlinko. This is NOT new: it’s just good writing practice. But it is more important than ever, and if you weren’t already doing these things, you need to start now.


Content Investment Increases

Creating content that performs well across multiple search platforms requires more time and expertise. And you might even need to start creating content on different platforms too.

Why?

Because appearing in AI responses isn’t just about writing great blog posts. These tools love to reference user-generated content, forums like Reddit, and YouTube videos.

ChatGPT – Prompt – UGC from forums

This means you’ll need to consider creating content beyond your website.

New KPIs to Track

Website traffic is still important, but it’s not the only success metric. You need to start measuring:

  • Brand mention frequency in AI responses
  • Citation accuracy across AI platforms (i.e., are the tools saying the right things about your brand?)
  • Share of voice in AI-generated answers
  • Brand sentiment in AI outputs

A tool that does all four of these is Semrush’s AI SEO Toolkit.

It’ll show your brand’s overall visibility and share of voice in AI tools like ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity:

Semrush AI SEO – Visibility – Backlinko

You can also see how these tools perceive your brand versus your rivals:

Semrush AI SEO – Perception – Backlinko

The tool also shows you how often you’re cited compared to your competitors:

Semrush AI SEO – Citations – Backlinko

Finally, you can also find out the questions real users are asking about your industry:

Semrush AI SEO – Questions – Backlinko

You can use the AI SEO Toolkit’s insights to create and optimize your content for the questions users are asking. And you can optimize your overall visibility to ensure AI tools are saying the right things about your brand.

How to Explain It All to Your Boss/Stakeholders

Your boss and stakeholders in your business are going to hear about the likes of GEO and AIO and have questions for you. There’s no avoiding that.

This means you need to be able to explain the shift in plain business language — without the jargon and without triggering panic.

Here’s how to do it.

Lead with the Reality, Not the Acronym

Your CMO doesn’t care if it’s SEO, GEO, or AEO.

They care if your brand is visible when it matters.

Don’t start with “We need to do GEO now.” Start with “Our customers are getting answers from AI systems, and we need to make sure we’re part of those answers.”

This immediately connects to business outcomes instead of marketing tactics.

Be Honest About the Uncertainty

Don’t pretend you have a perfect read on how AI engines source answers. (Nobody does.)

Say:

“Some factors are proven — authority, relevance, clarity, and trust. Others are emerging, and we’re still testing things. Here’s what we know, and here’s what we’re learning.”

That honesty builds more trust than overconfidence.

Leadership teams have seen too many “revolutionary” marketing tactics fizzle out. Make it clear you’re being strategic, not just chasing trends.

Anchor to Business Impact

Shift the conversation from traffic to results that leadership cares about:

  • Revenue from organic sources
  • Pipeline influenced by organic visibility
  • Brand lift and share of voice
  • Cost per acquisition trends
  • Customer lifetime value from organic channels

Instead of saying “We need to optimize for ChatGPT,” say:

“We expect fewer casual visits but higher conversion rates from people who find us through these new channels.”

This frames the expected change as quality improvement, not traffic loss.

Highlight the Win-Win Investments

Lay out the actions that are worth investing in, no matter what:

  • Deeper audience research: Understanding exactly what questions your prospects ask (across all platforms) improves everything from product development to sales conversations
  • Answer-ready content: Content that directly addresses customer questions performs better everywhere: traditional search, social media, sales enablement, and AI systems
  • Brand and topic mentions in trusted sources: Getting coverage and citations from authoritative websites helps with traditional SEO, brand awareness, and AI visibility
  • Strong UX and review presence: Better website experience and more customer reviews can improve conversion rates, regardless of where the traffic comes from
  • Measuring what matters: Tracking brand mentions, share of voice, and conversion quality gives you better business intelligence for any marketing channel

These efforts are likely to work in SEO, GEO, or any other flavor of optimization. They’re just good marketing practices.

Highlighting these gives leadership confidence that you’re not betting everything on one unproven tactic. And it tells them that no matter what, these are things you should be doing anyway.

Position the Expansion as an Advantage

Make it clear this isn’t about more work for the same payoff.

It’s about capturing market share while competitors are still figuring things out:

“Most of our competitors are still focused only on traditional search. We have a 6-12 month window to establish authority in AI systems before they catch up.”

This positions your team as forward-thinking, not reactive.

Address the Obvious Concerns

You’re going to get questions, no doubt about it. Here’s how to answer the most common ones:

Question: “How much will this cost?”

Answer: “Most of the work builds on our existing content strategy. We’re expanding our definition of search optimization, not replacing it.”

Break down the investment:

  • Content creation (already budgeted)
  • New monitoring tools (modest monthly cost)
  • Team training (one-time investment)
  • Testing and optimization (part of ongoing marketing)

Question: “How do we measure success?”

Answer: “We’ll track traditional metrics plus brand visibility across AI platforms. Success means maintaining our current organic performance while building presence in emerging channels.”

Set up a dashboard that shows both traditional SEO metrics and AI citation tracking side by side. (Or use a tool like Semrush to do this for you.)

Question: “What if this is just a fad?”

Answer: “The underlying strategy — creating authoritative, helpful content and offering a great user experience — is the foundation of good marketing. We’re just making sure that our content performs well across more search platforms.”

Frame it as good marketing practices and risk mitigation, not trend-following.

Provide a Clear Timeline

Month 1-2 (Foundation):

  • Audit existing content to understand its AI optimization potential
  • Set up monitoring tools for AI citations
  • Train team on new optimization principles

Month 3-4 (Testing):

  • Optimize select pieces of content for AI systems
  • Measure performance across traditional and AI search platforms
  • Refine approach based on results

Month 5-6 (Scaling):

  • Apply learnings to broader content strategy
  • Expand monitoring and optimization efforts
  • Report on impact to organic performance overall

Scripts for Explaining What You Do

When your job involves optimizing for AI systems, explaining what you actually do can be tricky. Here are a few ready-to-use scripts for different situations.

For Your Boss/Senior Stakeholders

“I’m expanding our search optimization strategy to include AI-powered platforms. We’re making sure our brand shows up when people ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google’s AI Mode about our industry. The same content quality that drives our current organic success will now work across multiple new discovery channels.”

For Family and Friends

“You know how people used to only Google things? Now they ask ChatGPT or voice assistants as well, or even instead. I make sure our company shows up in those AI answers when people ask about our industry. It’s like SEO but for AI. Instead of trying to rank #1 on Google, I’m trying to get our company mentioned when AI gives people recommendations.”

For Professional Profiles (LinkedIn, Resume, etc.)

“I help companies maintain and expand their organic visibility as search evolves beyond traditional engines to include AI-powered platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and Google’s AI Mode.”

For Prospective Clients/Customers

“We help companies get found by customers regardless of how they search — whether that’s Google, ChatGPT, or any other AI tool. Our approach combines traditional SEO with optimization for AI systems that are increasingly answering customer questions.”

For Industry Peers/Conferences

“The fundamentals of search optimization haven’t changed — authority, relevance, and user value still matter. But we’re now optimizing for systems that synthesize information rather than just ranking it. A lot of the tactics are familiar, but the platforms we’re optimizing for are expanding.”

How to Thrive in the AI Era of Search

Whether you call it SEO, GEO, AIO, or LLMO, the fundamentals of optimization and creating great content don’t change.

The goals shift a little, and how you measure success will differ compared to pure SEO.

But how you win in the AI era of search just requires an evolution of how you were doing things before.

To stay ahead of the game, check out these resources for more information:

The post SEO vs. GEO, AEO, LLMO: What Marketers Need to Know appeared first on Backlinko.

Read more at Read More

Why community is the antidote to AI overload in search marketing

Why community is the antidote to AI overload in search marketing

In 2025, people aren’t just searching for answers anymore.

They’re looking for genuine responses from the people they trust most: 

  • Creators.
  • Communities.
  • Fellow brand supporters. 

In many ways, community has become an algorithm of its own.

AI-powered tools like Google Gemini, ChatGPT, and Perplexity have made knowledge more accessible than ever. 

But in doing so, they’ve also flattened it. 

Answers feel repetitive, citations pull from the same limited sources, and brand voices risk becoming interchangeable.

That’s where community comes in. 

While generative AI commoditizes information, community restores individuality. 

It offers what no model can compress into tokens: 

  • Authentic connection.
  • Lived experience.
  • Trust.

When democratized information becomes homogenized

I can still remember when Google – and later YouTube – made information feel democratized, putting knowledge at our fingertips like never before.

But with the rise of AI, that same accessibility now comes at a cost: everything starts to sound the same.

Every brand competing for similar keywords risks becoming interchangeable, sounding the same in AI-generated summaries that deliver information without distinction. 

Meanwhile, authority is concentrated into a small set of repeatedly cited sources, so users encounter little variation in what LLMs surface.

In some ways, this is similar to traditional SEO

But there’s an important difference: websites once gave us the chance to “get our brand over” and show what made our solution unique. 

That’s what feels lost in an AI-driven search experience.

Still, within this sameness lies opportunity. 

While brands fight for visibility inside an AI Overview, those with the strongest communities can not just stand apart – but truly stand alone.

Dig deeper: SEO for user activation, retention and community

Community as the differentiator

AI responses are built around compression – getting audiences to an answer as quickly and concisely as possible. 

Community, on the other hand, expands.

AI platforms tend to generalize first, then personalize only when prompted. 

Community works the opposite way: it personalizes from the start.

In my view, that’s the kind of user experience audiences will ultimately prefer – and it’s how brands will become the choice within their niche.

Think about:

  • A Reddit thread that discusses your product specifically. That’s not just another citation. It’s a living testimonial, open to being challenged or reinforced in real time.
  • A Discord server filled with engaged users doesn’t just provide customer support – it showcases the culture and identity your brand is building.
  • Social comment threads around a creator’s content show personality, emotion, and authenticity that no LLM can replicate.

Ultimately, your community gives your brand the one thing AI can’t compress or flatten into tokens: individuality. 

In a world of sameness, community is what gives your brand its voice back.

UGC? Hello, UGT! 

User-generated content (UGC) has long been viewed as central to search marketing – a key driver of discoverability.

That’s still true, but the conversation has matured. 

It’s no longer just about “content.” What truly matters now is user-generated trust (UGT).

This may sound like a subtle mindset shift, but it changes everything. 

Search marketing teams should focus on the real, ongoing conversations within communities that validate products and learn how to leverage those conversations wherever possible.

That’s where genuine user advocacy emerges. And it’s advocacy that increasingly shows up in SERPs and AI responses.

Whether it’s a YouTube video featured in search results, a Reddit thread highlighted in an AI answer, or a TikTok creator’s series, UGT creates organic momentum. 

It sends signals to both people and algorithms that your brand is credible, trustworthy, and the preferred choice.

Backlinks can be gamed, and citations scraped or manufactured.

UGC is about output. And UGT? It’s about advocacy and credibility – and that’s exactly what search marketing teams need to drive lasting results.

Dig deeper: Advanced tactics to maximize the SEO value of user-generated content

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


How owned and earned communities build trust

When thinking about your brand community, there are two key considerations.

Owned communities

These are spaces where conversations and culture consistently reinforce or evolve your positioning and shape how you’re perceived.

They include:

  • Brand Discord channels. 
  • Slack groups.
  • Reddit forums.

Earned communities

These are the building blocks your brand participates in – where authenticity can either strengthen or undermine trust.

Think of:

  • Reddit threads not owned by your brand.
  • Facebook groups.
  • Quora discussions.
  • Comment threads.
  • Other spaces where people gather independently. 

Both owned and earned communities play a critical role in the smartest strategies. 

By seeding and nurturing conversations where your community and broader audience already gather.

By cultivating a “home” that is uniquely yours, you protect your brand against the homogenizing effect of AI-driven search.

Dig deeper: The rise of forums: Why Google prefers them and how to adapt

Why community is the secret sauce of search everywhere

Here’s a sobering thought: AI is only going to get better. 

They’ll become more skilled at surfacing consensus and amplifying shared rhetoric.

But consensus doesn’t drive differentiation. Community does.

A backlink can be replicated. A feature in a listicle can be matched. That’s just search marketing ping-pong.

A community, on the other hand, can’t be scraped, cloned, or copied.

Brands that invest in their communities today aren’t just building engagement.

They’re building something much more powerful: a moat of differentiation and individuality.

Community resists the sameness of AI-driven search. It’s what ensures your brand’s voice doesn’t just show up, but truly stands out.

LEGO Ideas: Community in action

One brand that proves the power of community as a competitive advantage – especially in an AI-driven world – is LEGO.

Through its LEGO Ideas platform, the company has turned its community into a creative engine for product ideation and a discovery layer that informs both content and product development.

Fans submit their ideas and vote on their favorites. The best and most popular are turned into real products. 

Everything from pop culture tie-ins (recently, a Wallace and Gromit set was greenlit) to architectural replicas has emerged through this process.

So why is this powerful from a search perspective?

There are two key reasons.

Authenticity at scale, organically

Every submission, vote, and comment is UGT in action. 

The community validates which ideas deserve attention, creating a visible signal of credibility long before a set hits the shelves.

Fan conversations fuel visibility

The conversations, forums, and social amplification around these fan-led projects fuel organic visibility. 

A single fan concept can spark thousands of blog posts, Reddit threads, YouTube videos, and TikToks – surfacing LEGO in contexts no AI citation list could ever replicate.

While competitors battle for presence in AI summaries or listicle roundups – vying to be labeled “Best Construction Toy” – LEGO has built differentiation through something much harder to copy: a living, breathing community that fuels product innovation, search visibility, and brand preference.

No amount of AI summarization can flatten a brand’s individuality when its users are constantly creating new stories about it.

Dig deeper: How to use social and forum data to inform next-level SEO strategies

From presence to preference: Why community wins

The future of search can’t be about simply being listed. 

Visibility alone is no longer enough.

Brands need to feel alive – human – and that happens through community.

AI can summarize anything, but it can’t replicate belonging. 

That’s why the brands investing in their communities today will be the ones that win tomorrow.

They won’t just be seen; they’ll be chosen. They’ll become the preference.

So, start by asking: where is my community already thriving? 

Listen, nurture, and amplify. 

That’s how you turn presence into preference in a world where every brand shows up.

Read more at Read More

The future of remarketing? Microsoft bets on impressions, not clicks

The future of remarketing? Microsoft bets on impressions, not clicks

There’s a shift happening in digital advertising. 

For years, remarketing hinged on clicks: someone had to visit your site, trigger a pixel, and leave behind a trail you could follow with ads. 

But what if you could build your remarketing audience before they ever click?

That is the core promise of impression-based remarketing – a Microsoft Advertising-exclusive capability that lets advertisers build audiences (or exclusions) simply from users seeing their ads. 

No click. No form fill. Just an impression.

In a world of privacy shifts, AI-driven search, and fractured attention spans, this approach may not just be a nice-to-have – it could be the future.

(Disclosure: I work as Microsoft’s product liaison, and the perspectives shared here reflect my role inside Microsoft Advertising.)

What is impression-based remarketing? 

Impression-based remarketing is Microsoft Advertising’s super-powered audience targeting method. 

Instead of waiting for a user to take an action such as visiting your site, it lets you track and segment audiences based solely on ad visibility. 

Here is how it works in plain terms: 

If your ad is displayed on Bing search results, native placements, Copilot, or other Microsoft inventory, the person who saw it can be added to a remarketing list. 

That list can then be used for targeting, exclusions, or bid adjustments across eligible campaigns. 

Key operational details: 

  • You can define up to 20 sources (campaigns or ad groups that feed your remarketing lists). 
  • The audience membership window can be 1-30 days (seven days is often the sweet spot for balancing awareness and consumer sentiment). 
  • Any campaign type can be a source, but not all can be a target. For example, Premium streaming can feed lists but cannot be targeted directly. 
  • Emerging surfaces like Copilot impressions are eligible as both sources and targets, though granular reporting is not yet fully available. To clarify, only Showroom ads (currently in closed beta) can specifically target Copilot placements. 
  • If you use autobidding, Microsoft’s system will factor in your bid adjustments, meaning a +20% bid really will raise CPC or CPM. 

In short, it is the ability to remarket to people who have only seen your ad, which opens up a broader, top-of-funnel opportunity while respecting the growing limitations on tracking. 

Dig deeper: Microsoft Advertising expands remarketing list sources to 20 campaigns

How to use it – functionally and strategically 

Think of impression-based remarketing in two phases: 

  • Functional setup: The technical nuts and bolts. 
  • Strategic execution: Deciding which campaigns feed the lists, which campaigns target them, and what creative to use. 
Microsoft Ads impression-based remarketing - How to use it – functionally and strategically

Functional setup 

  • Build your audience lists
    • Identify the campaigns or ad groups that will act as sources. 
    • These are the ads whose impressions will populate your lists. 
  • Create associations
    • Associate your sources with the target campaigns where you will use the audiences for targeting, exclusions, or bid adjustments. 
    • At least one audience ad must be in your associations to make all campaign types eligible to target. 
  • Decide on membership duration
    • Seven days is often ideal to balance recency with volume, but your industry’s buying cycle may warrant shorter or longer windows. 
  • Layer on bid strategies
    • Keep in mind that bid adjustments impact CPC or CPM directly under auto-bidding. 
Microsoft Ads impression-based remarketing - Functional setup

Strategic execution 

This is where impression-based remarketing can go from “neat” to “needle-moving.” 

Empathize with the customer journey 

A first-time viewer is not ready for the same message as a warm lead. 

The most common mistake in Impression-based remarketing is running the same creative to people regardless of where they are in the funnel. 

For example: 

  • Cold audience (first exposure): Focus on brand awareness and curiosity hooks. 
  • Warm audience (saw an ad, maybe interacted with other brand assets): Lean into unique value propositions and proof points. 
  • Hot audience (familiar, showing intent signals): Shift toward urgency, offers, or clear conversion CTAs. 

Tailor messaging to decision-makers vs. influencers 

Not all buyers are the same. In B2B, especially, the person seeing your ad may not be the one signing the check. 

  • Decision-maker personas respond to concrete ROI, cost, terms, and support benefits. 
  • Influencer personas, those who need to convince the buyer, often respond better to emotional appeals, user stories, or tips on how to get leadership buy-in. 

Use micro-steps in the buyer’s journey 

Since the trigger is just an impression, do not assume you can skip stages. 

Instead of expecting someone to leap from “saw ad” to “buy,” map out micro-conversions: 

  • Move from awareness to engagement (click, video view). 
  • From engagement to consideration (content download, add to cart). 
  • From consideration to decision (purchase, sign-up). 

Sometimes this means setting ad groups, not just campaigns, as your sources and targets to allow for precise audience control.

Budget with conversion thresholds in mind 

If your targeting is too narrow, you might never gather enough impressions to reach performance significance.

Budgets should align with the audience sizes needed to meet your conversion goals.

Microsoft Ads impression-based remarketing - Strategic execution

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


Why impressions are the future 

The shift to impression-based remarketing is not just about Microsoft offering a new targeting lever. 

It’s about survival in a rapidly changing ecosystem. 

1. Privacy is rewriting the rules 

With cookie deprecation, consent restrictions, and stricter data privacy laws, the reliable, click-based remarketing audiences of the past are disappearing. 

An impression, recorded server-side, does not rely on a user’s browser for tracking, making it a more resilient signal. 

2. AI-powered search changes user behavior 

As conversational AI like Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, and other assistants take center stage, the traditional search journey (“type query → click site → take action”) is being replaced. 

In many cases, users will get answers without ever clicking a link. 

This means advertisers must reach and influence people before they click, or even without them clicking at all. 

Dig deeper: How Microsoft Ads compares to Google Ads and when to use it

3. Sentiment and recall become the new metrics 

The old metrics, such as CTR, do not tell the whole story when much of the journey happens off-site. 

The future winners will be brands that: 

  • Create memorable touchpoints. 
  • Build positive sentiment before a user enters the buying stage. 
  • Stay top-of-mind when the moment of need arises. 

Impression-based remarketing allows you to intentionally re-engage based on visibility alone, which aligns perfectly with these goals. 

4. Redeeming undervalued placements 

Historically, advertisers have excluded certain placements, such as mobile games or sites with high ad density, because they seemed “low quality” in a click-through world. 

Those same environments can be very effective for brand imprinting. 

The user might not click in the moment, but repeated impressions in familiar contexts can drive recall later. 

Impression-based remarketing allows you to capitalize on these “slow burn” touches without overvaluing accidental clicks.  

Takeaways for advertisers 

If you are planning campaigns for the holiday season or for the AI-driven world we are already stepping into, here is the checklist to make impression-based remarketing work for you: 

  • Set it up now
    • Build your sources and associations. 
    • Keep the target list broad, but be selective with your sources. 
  • Map the journey
    • Identify what someone needs to see first, second, and third. 
    • Create dedicated creative for each stage. 
  • Respect personas
    • Decision-makers and influencers need different messaging. 
    • Avoid “one size fits all” creative blasts. 
  • Budget for volume and thresholds
    • Without enough impressions, your targeting power fades. 
    • Ensure campaigns have enough spend to feed the machine. 
  • Think beyond clicks
    • Use impression-based lists to drive brand familiarity, not just immediate conversions. 
    • Measure impact with recall and sentiment studies where possible. 

Impression-based remarketing: From feature to future

Impression-based remarketing is not just another targeting option. 

It is a structural shift in how advertisers can build relationships with their audiences. 

In a clickless, AI-mediated future, it lets you control the who and when of your targeting, even if the how of user interaction changes completely. 

Microsoft might have positioned it as a feature, but for savvy advertisers, it is a competitive moat. 

Dig deeper: How to maximize your Google Ads remarketing campaigns

Read more at Read More