AI visibility metrics help uncover pre-click influences that might not be obvious from search terms, conversion tracking, landing page analysis, or other conventional data points. They add context that helps explain why campaigns attract the right customers, the wrong customers, or no customers at all.
Performance marketers are paid to find the most valuable customers with the most efficient spend. The baseline is understanding what happened after someone searched, clicked, or converted. But focusing exclusively on cleaning up existing demand is a short-sighted goal.
AI experiences (and what goes into serving them) are just as important to performance workflows because AI can shape what customers know, which brands they consider, and the language they use before they ever reach an ad or website.
What AI visibility metrics reveal
AI visibility metrics help answer two questions:
- What information did an AI system retrieve to support its response?
- Was your brand part of the information that shaped that response?
Three signals are especially useful:
- Grounding queries show the retrieval searches AI systems use to gather supporting information and the broader topics your brand appears in.
- Citations show when your content is referenced in an AI-generated response.
- Share of authority shows how much citation activity belongs to your domain compared with other cited domains for the same topic or query set.
See exactly how your competitors win.
Uncover the keywords, ads, landing pages, and strategies driving your competitors’ paid search success—and find your next opportunity to outperform them.
Analyze your competitors
How to put AI visibility to work
Grounding queries show how AI interprets human intent
Search terms show what a person typed. Grounding queries show the information an AI system retrieved to help answer that person’s question.
A single prompt can generate several grounding queries covering comparisons, pricing, reviews, product details, availability, implementation questions, or other supporting topics. Those queries show how AI translates a human need into retrievable information.
It gives you another way to evaluate whether landing pages, product descriptions, and campaign messaging communicate the right value.
If AI systems consistently associate your brand with services you don’t offer, audiences you don’t want, or use cases that don’t convert well, that mismatch may eventually show up in paid campaigns as traffic that looks relevant but performs poorly.
For example, a B2B company offering executive coaching may not want to be interpreted the same way as a company offering tactical sales training. Both ideas may be semantically similar, but they can attract different buyers, budgets, expectations, and conversion paths.
If grounding queries consistently associate the company with lower-value training searches instead of higher-value advisory or coaching needs, that’s a signal worth investigating.
The useful signal isn’t whether one phrase is universally better than another. It’s whether grounding queries, search terms, landing page behavior, and conversion quality point to the same interpretation of the same offer.
What to do with this insight
If you see a lot of relevant grounding queries, that can be a strong opportunity to test AI-powered query matching with Performance Max, AI Max, or other AI-supported campaign types.
At minimum, grounding queries can inform keyword testing, search themes, creative ideas, and landing page updates. The key is to treat grounding queries as inputs, not instructions.
A grounding query isn’t the same as a keyword. It’s a clue about how AI systems interpret intent. Before acting on it, ask:
- Does this query reflect a product or service we actually want to sell?
- Does it match the customers we want more of?
- Do we have a landing page that supports this intent?
- Would this work better as a keyword, search theme, creative test, or content update?
- Can we measure whether the test improves conversion quality?
If grounding queries and search terms overlap in valuable ways, that may validate that AI systems and customers are interpreting your offer similarly
If they don’t overlap, investigate before changing bids or budgets. The issue may be messaging, landing page clarity, or content gaps rather than campaign settings.
Dig deeper: SEO vs. PPC vs. AI: The visibility dilemma
Citations and topics help you preview how AI understands your brand
A citation doesn’t mean you won the customer, the final answer, or the conversion. It means your content helped shape the AI experience. That matters because consideration can happen before a measurable click.
If your brand is cited for topics that align with your paid campaigns, your content and campaign messaging may reinforce each other. If your brand is cited for topics that don’t match what you sell, who you serve, or where you win, that may explain why some campaign traffic looks relevant on the surface but doesn’t convert well.
Topics add another layer by showing the themes, attributes, and categories AI systems associate with your brand. That can be especially useful when you’re trying to understand whether AI systems accurately represent your brand.
For example, if a cybersecurity platform wants to be known for enterprise identity protection but AI visibility reporting consistently associates it with small-business antivirus comparisons, that mismatch could be leading to lower-quality “conversions” that translate into bad data for the ad platform. What looks like a campaign settings or targeting issue could actually be a phrasing or content problem.
This is why landing page content matters. AI-powered campaign features such as final URL expansion, asset optimization, and broader matching systems also rely on how your brand, products, services, and pages are interpreted.
If AI visibility data shows that AI systems misunderstand your brand, there’s a reasonable chance campaign automation could inherit some of that confusion.
What to do with this insight
If citations and topics are misaligned, audit your landing page content before assuming the issue is bidding, budget, or audience targeting.
Look at how your priority pages describe:
- The problems you solve and whether you attempt to tackle more than one.
- The proof points that support the claims made in your advertising.
- The customer types you want more of based on how you describe your services.
Then compare that language with the topics where AI systems cite or associate your brand.
If AI systems are pulling your brand into the wrong topics, tighten the content. Make the product category, audience, proof points, and next step easier to understand. If the right topics appear but your citations are weak, look for places where your content may be too thin, too generic, or missing the evidence needed to be useful.
Better content can strengthen paid media campaigns because AI-powered campaign tools are increasingly tasked with interpreting pages, assets, and customer context. The clearer your landing pages and content are, the easier it is for those systems to understand where your offer is relevant.
Dig deeper: 4 CRO strategies that work for humans and AI
Share of authority reveals where competitors are beating you in AI recommendations
Citations show whether your content is referenced in a given grounding query.
Share of authority shows how much citation activity belongs to your domain compared with other cited domains for the same topic or grounding query. This can be a useful competitive signal because it shows where other brands may be influencing the customer’s research journey before a search, click, or conversion happens.
If competitors are cited more often on a priority topic, they may be doing a better job answering the questions customers ask before they convert. This might mean:
- More accessible landing pages.
- Better proof points, such as reviews and awards.
- More useful product information that aligns with their feed.
Fundamentally, ask:
- Are competitors doing a better job proving their value in the places AI systems use to shape recommendations?
If the answer is yes, the issue may not be that your campaigns are broken. Your content may not be giving AI systems enough clear, useful, or verifiable information to understand why your brand belongs in the recommendation set.
What to do with this insight
Use share of authority to identify where competitors are outperforming you on topics that matter to the business. Then invest in the content and landing page experiences that prove your value.
That might mean:
- Building new landing pages for high-value use cases.
- Expanding product or service details to include ideas mentioned in grounding queries.
- Adding clearer proof points, such as reviews and awards.
- Updating creative and messaging to reflect what customers and AI systems are already asking about.
Not every share-of-authority gap deserves action. If you’re underrepresented on a topic that doesn’t matter to your business, that may be fine.
But if you’re underrepresented on a high-value category, core product, branded initiative, or use case that your paid campaigns depend on, that gap deserves attention.
The performance question isn’t: “How do we become visible everywhere?” A better question is: “Where do we need stronger evidence so qualified customers are more likely to consider us?”
Every click they win is a customer you lose.
See where competitors are investing, which keywords drive their results, and how to capture more of the market.
See who’s stealing your traffic
What AI visibility adds to PPC reporting
AI visibility reporting isn’t a replacement for conversion reports, bidding reports, placement reports, or behavioral analytics. Those tools still tell you whether campaigns are working and where performance is coming from.
AI visibility adds a different perspective. It helps explain how customers, AI systems, and competitors interact with information before traditional performance metrics exist.
Read more at
