AI citations explained: how they work and how to get them

AI search is changing how visibility works. Users are getting direct answers instead of clicking links, which means fewer chances to drive traffic. In this shift, AI citations are becoming the new gatekeepers, deciding which sources get featured in answers. Over the past year, search has moved from ranking pages to selecting sources, pushing us from traditional SEO toward AI-driven visibility.

In this article, we’ll explain what AI citations are, how they work, and how you can earn them.

Key takeaways

  • AI citations are references that search engines include in AI-generated answers, enhancing credibility and visibility
  • This shift in visibility moves from traditional SEO ranking to AI-driven inclusion as a key factor for brand presence
  • AI tools retrieve information from diverse sources, with citations coming from both top-ranking and deeper pages
  • To earn AI citations, create valuable, structured content and establish topical authority across your niche
  • Tools like Yoast AI Brand Insights help track your AI visibility and citation presence across platforms

What are AI citations?

Citations have always been a way to show where information comes from and why it can be trusted. The same idea now applies to AI-generated answers.

ai citations example
ChatGPT cites resources in its answer

AI citations are the references that search engines and AI tools include to support the answers they generate. When a tool like ChatGPT responds to a query, it often points to specific pages or sources that back up the information. These references act as signals of credibility, helping users understand where the answer is coming from and giving them a way to explore the original content.

In simple terms, if your content is cited, it becomes part of the answer itself, and not just another link in the results.

AI citations vs the blue link era

If AI citations determine what gets included in answers, it’s worth asking how this differs from how search used to work. Because this isn’t just a feature update, it’s a shift in how visibility itself is earned.

In the traditional model, ranking higher meant getting more clicks. In AI-driven search, being selected as a source matters just as much, if not more.

Aspect Traditional SEO AI citations
Visibility Blue links Ai-generated answers
Traffic Click-driven Influence-driven
Authority signal Backlinks Credibility and accuracy
User action Visit website Consume instant answers

This doesn’t mean traditional SEO is going away. Rankings, indexing, and backlinks still play a critical role. However, how that value gets surfaced is changing. Instead of just competing for position on a results page, you’re now competing to be part of the answer itself.

Do check out Alex Moss’s talk at BrightonSEO, 2025, on the evolution of search intent and discoverability.

Where do AI citations come from?

Before you try to earn AI citations, it’s important to understand where they actually come from. Because you’re not just competing with other blog posts, you’re competing with an entire information ecosystem.

AI models pull their answers from a mix of sources:

  • Web content: Blog posts, guides, landing pages, and long-form articles
  • Structured sources: Platforms like Wikipedia, documentation hubs, and product data feeds
  • Forums and UGC: Discussions from Reddit, Quora, and Stack Overflow
  • First-party data: Brand websites, help centers, and official resources

How the sources are selected is quite interesting. A recent analysis of Google’s AI Overviews found that citations don’t strictly come from top-ranking pages. In fact, only about 38% of cited sources rank in the top 10 results, meaning a large share comes from deeper pages or alternative formats.

Another key insight by CXL: AI models tend to prioritize clear, early answers within the content, with a significant portion of citations pulled from the top sections of a page rather than from deeper sections.

The takeaway is simple. AI systems are not just ranking content; they are selecting the most useful pieces of information across formats and sources. That means your content is competing not only for rankings but also for clarity, structure, and trustworthiness across this entire ecosystem.

Types of AI citations

Not all AI citations look the same. Depending on the query and intent, AI models pull in different types of sources to support their answers.

Broadly, you’ll see three main types:

Informational citations

These are the most common. AI tools refer to blog posts, guides, and educational content to explain concepts or answer questions. If someone asks, “what are AI citations,” the sources cited will typically be long-form, explanatory content.

informational citation example
Informational citations made by ChatGPT

Product citations

These show up in commercial or comparison queries. For example, “best SEO tools” or “top project management software.” Here, AI models cite product pages, listicles, and review-based content to support recommendations.

product citation example
Product citations by Google AI mode, the model shares both online and offline options

Multimedia citations

AI doesn’t rely solely on text. Videos, images, and other visual formats can also be cited, especially when they better explain something than text alone. Think tutorials, walkthroughs, or demonstrations.

multimedia ai citation example
Multimedia citation for a query by ChatGPT

How AI citations impact brand credibility

AI citations don’t just drive visibility. They shape how your brand is perceived before a user even visits your website.

When your content is cited in an AI-generated answer, some of that trust transfers to your brand. You’re no longer just another result on a page; you’re part of the answer itself. And that changes how users interpret your authority.

This also means buyer decisions are starting earlier. Users may form opinions, shortlist options, or even make decisions directly from AI responses, without ever clicking through. If your brand isn’t cited, you’re not part of that consideration set.

There’s also a strong signal of relevance at play. Being included in AI answers suggests that your content is not just optimized, but genuinely useful in context. It tells both users and algorithms that your brand deserves to be surfaced.

Over time, this creates a compounding effect. The more your content is cited, the more your brand becomes associated with specific topics. That repeated exposure builds familiarity, authority, and trust.

How AI citations work: a complete breakdown

So far, we’ve talked about what AI citations are and where they come from. But how do AI systems actually decide what to cite?

Let’s break it down.

A diagram by AWS showing the conceptual flow of using RAG with LLMs

At a high level, most AI-powered search systems follow a retrieval-and-synthesis process, often powered by approaches such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). In simple terms, they don’t just generate answers; they find, evaluate, and assemble information from multiple sources before deciding what to cite.

Here’s what that process looks like in practice:

1. Query understanding

Everything starts with intent. The AI interprets what the user is really asking, whether it’s informational, navigational, or commercial. This step shapes what kind of sources it will look for.

2. Retrieval of sources

Next, the system pulls in potential sources from multiple places:

  • Web indexes
  • Training data patterns
  • Live retrieval systems (depending on the model)

This is where your content first enters the consideration set.

3. Source evaluation

Not all sources are treated equally. AI models evaluate them based on:

  • Relevance to the query
  • Authority and trust signals
  • Clarity and structure of information
  • Entity-level trust (how credible the brand or author is)

When you look at these signals closely, they all point in one direction. Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T) play a central role in determining what gets cited. In other words, AI systems aren’t just looking for answers; they’re looking for reliable sources behind those answers.

4. Answer synthesis

Instead of showing individual links, AI combines insights from multiple sources into a single, cohesive answer. This is where your content may be used, even if it’s not directly cited.

5. Citation selection

Finally, the model decides which sources to:

  • Explicitly cite (with links or references)
  • Implicitly use (without direct attribution)

This is the step that ultimately determines your visibility.

How this differs across AI systems

While the core process is similar, different AI tools prioritize different parts of this pipeline.

AI systems How it handles citations
ChatGPT Leans more on third-party sources and consensus, such as directories, reviews, and aggregator sites, rather than relying heavily on brand-owned content.
Perplexity Focuses on retrieval-first behavior, pulling from a wide range of web sources and surfacing multiple citations to support transparency (strong emphasis on external validation).
Gemini Prioritizes brand-owned and structured content, especially pages that are clearly organized and easy to interpret.

Must read: Why does having insights across multiple LLMs matter for brand visibility?

Key signals AI models use for citing content

Even though the process is complex, the signals that increase your chances of being cited are surprisingly consistent:

  • Well-organized structure: Clear headings, bullet points, and logical flow make it easier for AI to extract information
  • Evidence-based reasoning: Content that references data, sources, or supporting claims is more likely to be trusted
  • Timeliness and relevance: Fresh, updated content often gets prioritized, especially for evolving topics
  • Authoritative voice and depth: Content that demonstrates expertise and covers a topic comprehensively stands out
  • Topical consistency: Brands that consistently publish around a topic are more likely to be recognized as reliable sources

The key takeaway here is simple: AI citations are not random. They are the result of a structured evaluation process in which clarity, trust, and relevance determine who is included in the final answer.

Must read: How to use headings on your site

Strategies to get cited by AI models

So far, we’ve looked at what AI citations are and how models decide what to cite. The next question is the one that matters most: how do you actually get cited?

Because this isn’t just about creating content, it’s about sending the right signals that your content is worth citing. Here are some strategies that can help you do exactly that:

1. Create citation-friendly content

Citation-worthy content goes beyond surface-level answers. It offers original thinking, clear explanations, and real value, helping AI models support their responses with confidence. In other words, it’s not just optimized, it earns references by being genuinely useful.

The following content types consistently get cited by AI models:

Content type What to write Why AI loves them
Original research Studies or data that answer new or unexplored questions Gives AI concrete evidence to support claims
Case studies Real-world examples showing how something works in practice Helps AI justify recommendations with proof
Thought leadership Opinion-led content with unique insights or perspectives Adds depth and diversity to AI-generated answers
News content Timely, accurate coverage of recent developments Fills gaps where training data falls short

2. Build topical authority (clusters)

AI models don’t just evaluate individual pages; they evaluate how consistently you cover a topic.

If you publish multiple pieces on a specific subject, each addressing different aspects, you signal depth, expertise, and reliability. That’s what topical authority is all about.

And this is where E-E-A-T naturally comes into play. The more consistently you demonstrate experience and expertise in a niche, the more likely your content is to be trusted and cited.

What to do in practice:

  • Create clusters around a core topic (pillar page/cornerstone content + supporting content)
  • Cover both broad and specific questions in your niche
  • Go beyond basic answers, add expert insights, examples, or real-world context
  • Keep your messaging and terminology consistent across content

3. Strengthen entity signals (brand, authorship, schema)

AI systems evaluate content, but they also evaluate who is behind it.

Strong entity signals help models understand your brand, your authors, and your credibility within a topic. The clearer these signals are, the easier it is for AI to trust and cite your content.

What to do in practice:

  • Build clear author profiles with expertise and credentials
  • Maintain consistent brand mentions across your site and the web
  • Use structured data (schema) to define authors, organizations, and content relationships
  • Ensure your “About” and author pages clearly establish credibility

4. Earn external validation signals across the web

AI models don’t rely on a single source of truth. They validate information by cross-referencing multiple sources across the web.

That means your credibility isn’t built only on your website. It’s shaped by how consistently your brand shows up across trusted platforms. The more aligned and authoritative those signals are, the easier it is for AI systems to trust and cite your content.

Think of this as building a web-wide validation layer that reinforces your brand through multiple independent sources.

This is also where traditional SEO practices like link building evolve. It’s no longer just about backlinks, but about earning consistent, high-quality mentions that strengthen your entity across the web.

What to do in practice:

  • Contribute insights to reputable publications in your niche
  • Earn consistent mentions across industry blogs, directories, and review platforms
  • Build high-quality backlinks through a strategic link-building approach
  • Be active in communities like Reddit, Quora, or niche forums
  • Run digital PR campaigns that reinforce your brand narrative across sources

5. Keep content fresh and updated

AI models prefer content that reflects current information.

Outdated content is less likely to be trusted, especially for topics that evolve quickly. Regular updates signal that your content is still relevant and reliable.

What to do in practice:

  • Refresh key articles with updated data, examples, and insights
  • Add new sections instead of rewriting from scratch where possible
  • Clearly indicate updates (timestamps, revised sections)
  • Prioritize high-performing or high-potential pages for updates

Must read: How to optimize content for AI LLM comprehension using Yoast’s tools

6. Structure content for answer extraction

AI models don’t read content the way humans do. They extract answers.

Most AI-generated responses are built by identifying clear, concise answer blocks within content. And increasingly, users prefer this format. In fact, according to a poll by IWAI, 67% of users find AI tools more efficient than traditional search for getting answers. That shift makes one thing clear: if your content doesn’t directly answer questions, it’s less likely to be surfaced or cited.

This means it’s not enough to include answers. You need to structure your content so those answers are easy to find, interpret, and reuse.

What to do in practice:

  • Lead sections with direct, concise answers before expanding
  • Use headings that mirror real user queries and intent
  • Break down complex topics into scannable, extractable sections
  • Add summaries, definitions, or key takeaways at the start of sections
  • Anticipate follow-up questions and answer them within the same content

Tracking AI brand presence with Yoast

By now, we know what AI citations are, how they work, and how to earn them. But here’s the real question: how do you know if you’re already being cited? And if not, how do you understand where your competitors are showing up and where you’re missing out?

That’s the gap Yoast AI Brand Insights is built to solve.

As AI-generated answers become a key discovery layer, most traditional analytics tools fall short. They can tell you about traffic, but not whether your brand is being mentioned, how it’s being perceived, or which sources AI systems trust when referencing you. That’s a critical blind spot, especially as AI answers increasingly shape user decisions before a click even occurs.

Yoast AI Brand Insights helps you track and understand your AI visibility, citations, and brand mentions across platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, so you can move from guesswork to informed action.

Here’s what it enables you to do:

Sentiment tracking

Understand how your brand is being perceived in AI-generated answers. The tool analyzes keywords associated with your brand and shows whether the overall sentiment is positive or negative, helping you spot tone issues and shifts over time.

Citation analysis (brand mentions)

See when and where your brand is being cited. More importantly, understand which sources AI platforms reference alongside your brand, so you can identify citation gaps and opportunities to improve your presence.

Competitor benchmarking

See how you stack up against other brands mentioned in your prompts

AI visibility is relative. This feature lets you compare your brand’s citations, mentions, and sentiment against competitors, helping you understand who is being surfaced more often and why.

Question monitoring

AI search is driven by queries. With question monitoring, you can track specific brand-related or industry questions and see whether your brand appears in the answers, giving you direct insight into where you’re visible and where you’re missing.

AI visibility index

See your score, which is a representation of different AI signals

Instead of looking at isolated metrics, Yoast combines signals like citations, mentions, sentiment, and rankings into a single visibility score. This gives you a clearer picture of how your brand performs across AI systems over time.

The bigger picture here is simple: Yoast AI Brand Insights helps you understand your position in this new ecosystem, so you can strengthen your presence, close gaps, and ensure your brand is part of the answers your audience is already consuming.

FAQs on AI citations

AI citations can feel complex at first, especially as search continues to evolve. Here are answers to some of the most common questions to help you navigate them better.

Are backlinks different from AI citations?

Yes, they serve different purposes. Backlinks help your pages rank in traditional search, while AI citations determine whether your content gets included in AI-generated answers. In short, backlinks drive visibility on SERPs, while citations drive visibility within answers.

If you want a deeper breakdown, check out this guide on AI citations vs backlinks.

Do AI systems always provide citations?

No, AI systems don’t always include citations. When responses are generated purely from pre-trained knowledge rather than retrieved sources, citations may not appear.

To test this, I tried the following prompts on ChatGPT:

ai prompts tried for citations

Out of these, citations appeared in about half of the responses.

A clear pattern emerged:

  • Queries involving products, recommendations, statistics, or recent events were more likely to trigger citations
  • Queries focused on definitions or general knowledge often did not include citations

This shows that citation behavior depends heavily on the query type, intent, and context. Not every answer requires a source, but the more specific or evidence-driven the query, the more likely citations are to appear.

How do I direct AI models to the most important content on my website?

You can’t directly control what AI models choose to cite, but you can make it easier for them to understand and prioritize your content.

One effective way to do this is by using llms.txt, a feature in Yoast SEO. It creates a structured, LLM-friendly markdown file that highlights your most important pages, helping LLMs better understand your site when generating answers.

A smarter analysis in Yoast SEO Premium

Yoast SEO Premium has a smart content analysis that helps you take your content to the next level!

Get Yoast SEO Premium Only $118.80 / year (ex VAT)

Think of it as a way to clearly communicate which content matters most, so when AI systems look for reliable sources, your key pages are easier to interpret and surface.

AI citations: The currency of the AI-driven web

AI citations are changing how users discover and trust information. They don’t just complement rankings; they reshape them by deciding which sources become part of the answer itself. In many cases, users no longer need to click to explore. If your content is cited, you’re visible. If not, you’re invisible.

This shift also changes what we optimize for. It’s no longer just about traffic; it’s about trust, relevance, and inclusion in the answer layer. As we explored in our recent read, Rethinking SEO in the age of AI, the central question for SEO is evolving. It’s no longer just, “Can Google find my website?” It’s now, “Does the AI have a reason to remember my brand?”

The post AI citations explained: how they work and how to get them appeared first on Yoast.

Read more at Read More

The March 2026 SEO Update by Yoast recap

The March 2026 SEO Update by Yoast is part of our monthly webinar series covering the latest developments in search and AI. Hosted by Carolyn Shelby and Alex Moss, this month’s session explored how AI is reshaping search, Google’s latest moves, and what brands should prioritize now.

Watch the full recap on YouTube to dive deeper into these topics, hear audience questions, and see real-world examples.

SEO and AI news from March 2026

AI tools become more personal and mobile

AI is moving beyond standalone apps, integrating into messaging platforms (like Claude’s Telegram/Discord support) and desktop environments (e.g., Meta’s My Computer). This shift makes AI more accessible but also blurs the lines between search and daily tools.

Why it matters: Brands must ensure their content is discoverable across multiple surfaces, not just traditional search engines.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Optimize for conversational queries and structured data to improve visibility in AI-driven tools.

Google’s patent for AI-generated landing pages

Google filed a patent describing a system that replaces traditional SERPs with AI-generated landing pages. This could signal the end of the “10 blue links” era, forcing brands to rethink how they measure visibility.

Why it matters: If Google shifts to AI-generated pages, traditional ranking metrics may become less relevant. Brands will need to control their narrative across multiple sources to ensure accuracy in AI responses.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Audit your content for clarity and structure (e.g., avoid excessive JavaScript, use clear headings).
  • Diversify your presence beyond your website (e.g., social media, YouTube, newsletters) to reinforce authority.

Markdown as a preferred format for AI

Markdown is gaining traction as a lightweight, AI-friendly format. WordPress.org now offers Markdown versions of pages, and tools like Cloudflare’s crawl endpoint make it easier for AI to parse content efficiently.

Why it matters: While Google downplays Markdown’s importance, other AI tools may rely on it for grounding responses. Simplifying your content structure could improve visibility in AI-driven search.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Consider offering Markdown versions of key pages (e.g., FAQs, product descriptions) to help AI extract content.
  • Avoid hiding critical information in images or complex JavaScript, as AI may not process it efficiently.

Google Search Console adds branded vs. non-branded filter

Google Search Console now includes a filter to separate branded and non-branded queries. This helps brands identify confusion in search intent and optimize accordingly.

Why it matters: If non-branded queries drive traffic, it may signal an opportunity to refine messaging or target new audiences.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Use the filter to identify gaps in your content strategy (e.g., if branded queries dominate, expand into non-branded topics).
  • Monitor for unexpected branded queries, which may indicate confusion or misalignment with user intent.

Google Maps integrates AI for search

Google Maps is testing an AI-powered chat feature that lets users ask questions (e.g., “Find a Starbucks on my route”). Early feedback suggests it’s not yet as accurate as traditional search, but this could evolve quickly.

Why it matters: AI-driven local search could change how users discover businesses, making it critical to optimize for conversational queries.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Ensure your Google Business Profile is up to date with accurate hours, locations, and services.
  • Use natural language in your content to align with how users phrase questions.

Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) expands

Google’s Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP), an open standard for AI-driven e-commerce, added new features like cart management, catalog search, and identity linking (for loyalty programs). This aims to streamline shopping within AI platforms.

Why it matters: UCP could become a standard for AI-powered commerce, making it essential for e-commerce brands to adopt early.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Explore UCP integration to improve visibility in AI-driven shopping experiences.
  • Optimize product schema and ensure your Merchant Center data is accurate.

Zero-click search doesn’t mean zero influence

Rand Fishkin’s keynote at the Industrial Marketing Summit highlighted that while zero-click searches are rising, brands can still influence AI responses by maintaining a strong, consistent presence across multiple platforms.

Why it matters: AI relies on corroborating signals (e.g., repeated mentions of your brand across trusted sources) to validate information. A single website isn’t enough, so you need a multi-channel strategy.

Actionable takeaway:

  • Repurpose content across platforms (e.g., LinkedIn, Substack, YouTube) to reinforce your brand’s authority.
  • Ensure your messaging is consistent across all channels to improve AI’s confidence in your content.

What to focus on in 2026

The March 2026 update highlighted several priorities for search strategy:

  • Optimize for AI-driven search: Use structured data, clear headings, and consistent messaging to improve visibility in AI responses.
  • Build brand authority across channels: Diversify your presence beyond your website to reinforce your narrative in AI-generated content.
  • Prepare for agentic commerce: Adopt protocols like UCP and optimize product schema for AI-powered shopping.
  • Avoid low-quality AI-generated content: Focus on high-value, human-centric content that aligns with user intent.

Sign up for the next SEO Update by Yoast

The next SEO Update by Yoast is on April 28, 2026, at 4:00 PM CET (10:00 AM EST). Sign up here to join the live discussion or get the recording.

The post The March 2026 SEO Update by Yoast recap appeared first on Yoast.

Read more at Read More

Reddit introduces collection ads, deal overlays, Shopify integration

Reddit logo displayed on smartphone screen

Reddit is rolling out new Dynamic Product Ad features, including a shoppable Collection Ads format and Shopify integration, the company announced today.

What’s new.

  • Collection Ads: A new Dynamic Product Ad format that pairs a lifestyle hero image with shoppable product tiles in one carousel, bridging discovery and purchase. Early adopters following best practices are seeing an 8% ROAS lift.
  • Community and Deal overlays: Reddit-native labels like “Redditors’ Top Pick” and automatic discount callouts surface social proof and pricing signals without extra work from you.
  • Shopify integration: Now in alpha, this simplifies catalog and pixel setup for new DPA advertisers, automatically matching products to the right users and context.

The numbers. Reddit DPA delivered an average 91% higher ROAS year over year in Q4 2025. Liquid I.V. reports DPA already accounts for 33% of its total platform revenue and outperforms its other conversion campaigns by 40%.

Why now. Reddit has seen a 40% year-over-year increase in shopping conversations. Also, 84% of shoppers say they feel more confident in purchases after researching products on Reddit.

Why we care. The new tools, especially the Shopify integration, lower the barrier to getting started with Dynamic Product Ads. Reddit might still be viewed by some as an undervalued paid media channel, but there’s an opportunity to get in before competition and costs rise.

Bottom line. Reddit is increasingly a serious performance channel for ecommerce, and these tools make it easier to get started. If you’re not yet running DPA on Reddit, the combination of undervalued inventory and improving ad formats makes this a good time to test.

Reddit’s announcement. Introducing More Ways to Tap into Shopping on Reddit

Read more at Read More

AI citations favor listicles, articles, product pages: Study

AI citation engine

AI search citations favor a small set of formats. Listicles, articles, and product pages drive over half of all mentions across major LLMs, according to new Wix Studio AI Search Lab research analyzing 75,000 AI answers and more than 1 million citations across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity.

The findings. Listicles led at 21.9% of citations, followed by articles (16.7%) and product pages (13.7%). Together, these three formats made up 52% of all AI citations.

  • Articles dominated informational queries, cited 2.7x more than other formats.
  • Listicles captured 40% of commercial-intent citations, nearly double any other type.

Why intent wins. Query intent — not industry or model — most strongly predicts which content gets cited. This pattern held across industries, from SaaS to health.

  • Informational queries skewed heavily toward articles (45.5%) and listicles (21.7%).
  • Commercial queries were led by listicles (40.9%).
  • Transactional and navigational queries favored product and category pages (around 40% combined).

Why we care. This research indicates that you want to map content types to user goals rather than just creating more content. Articles educate, listicles drive comparison, and product pages convert. Aligning content format with user intent could help you capture more AI citations and increase visibility.

Not all listicles perform equally. Third-party listicles accounted for 80.9% of citations in professional services, compared to 19.1% for self-promotional lists. That seems to indicate LLMs prefer neutral, editorial comparisons over brand-led rankings.

Model differences. All models favored listicles, but diverged after that.

  • ChatGPT leaned heavily into articles and informational content.
  • Google AI Mode showed the most balanced distribution.
  • Perplexity stood out, with 17% of citations coming from discussions like Reddit and forums.

Industry patterns. Content preferences shifted slightly by vertical:

  • SaaS and professional services over-indexed on listicles.
  • Health favored authoritative articles.
  • Ecommerce spread citations across listicles, articles, and category pages.
  • Home repair showed the most even distribution across formats.

The research. The content types most cited by LLMs

Read more at Read More

Google is tightening political content rules for Shopping ads starting April 16

Google shopping ads

A quiet but important policy update is coming to Google Shopping ads next month, requiring some merchants to verify their accounts before running ads featuring political content.

What’s changing. From April 16, merchants running Shopping ads with certain political content in nine countries will need to verify their Google Ads account as an election advertiser. Google will also outright prohibit some political Shopping ads in India.

The countries affected. Argentina, Australia, Chile, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Why we care. Shopping ads aren’t typically associated with political advertising — this update signals that Google is broadening its election integrity efforts beyond search and display into commerce formats. Merchants selling politically themed merchandise, campaign materials, or other related products in the affected countries need to act before the April 16 deadline.

What to do now.

  • Review the updated policy language to determine if your Shopping ads feature content that falls under the new restrictions
  • If affected, apply for election advertiser verification through Google Ads before April 16 to avoid disruption to your campaigns

The bottom line. This affects a narrow but specific set of merchants — but the consequences of missing the deadline could mean ads being disapproved or accounts being flagged. If you sell anything with a political angle in the listed countries, check your eligibility now.

Read more at Read More

ChatGPT citations favor a small group of domains: Study

AI retrieval vs citations

AI citations in ChatGPT are far more concentrated than citation distributions in traditional search. Roughly 30 domains capture 67% of citations within a topic.

  • That’s according to Kevin Indig’s latest study, which also found that broad topical coverage, long-form pages, and cluster-based models outperform the old “one keyword, one page” approach.

The details. Citation visibility wasn’t evenly distributed. In product comparison topics, the top 10 domains accounted for 46% of citations; the top 30, 67%.

  • AI visibility was slightly less concentrated than classic organic search, but still highly centralized.
  • Indig’s conclusion: you’re effectively shut out unless you build enough authority to win one of a limited number of citation “seats.”

What changed. Ranking No. 1 in Google still matters, but it’s not enough. Of pages ranking No. 1, 43.2% were cited by ChatGPT — 3.5x more often than pages beyond the top 20.

  • ChatGPT retrieved far more pages than it cited. AirOps found that it retrieved ~6x as many pages as it cited, and 85% of the retrieved pages were never cited.
  • A third of the cited pages came from fan-out queries, and 95% of those had zero search volume.

Why we care. Publishing the “best answer” for one keyword isn’t enough. ChatGPT rewards domains that cover a topic from multiple angles, not pages optimized for isolated terms. And discovery often happens outside the keyword universe you track.

The patterns. Longer pages generally earned more citations, with variation by vertical. The biggest lift appeared between 5,000 to 10,000 characters. Pages above 20,000 characters averaged 10.18 citations vs. 2.39 for pages under 500.

  • This pattern broke in Finance, where shorter, denser pages often outperformed long guides. In Education, Crypto, and Product Analytics, longer pages continued to gain citation value with little drop-off.
  • 58% of cited URLs were cited only once. Pages that recurred across prompts were usually category roundups, comparison pages, or broad guides answering multiple related questions.

On-page behavior. ChatGPT cited heavily from the upper part of a page. The 10% to 20% section performed best across all industries.

  • The bottom 10% earned just 2.4% to 4.4% of citations. Conclusions were largely ignored.
  • Finance had the steepest ramp, with 43.7% of citations in the first 30%.
  • Healthcare and HR Tech were flatter.
  • Education peaked later, around 30% to 40%.

About the data. Indig analyzed ~98,000 citation rows from ~1.2 million ChatGPT responses (Gauge), isolating seven verticals. The study used structural page parsing, positional mapping, and entity and sentiment analysis to identify which pages earned citations and where they come from.

The study. The science of how AI picks its sources

Read more at Read More

Google is testing AI-generated animated video clips inside PMax

Google Local Services Ads vs. Search Ads- Which drives better local leads?

A new creative feature has been spotted inside Google Ads Performance Max campaigns — and it could change how advertisers without video budgets approach animated display advertising.

What was found. Vice President of Search at JumpFly, Inc. Nikki Kuhlman spotted an option to generate animated video clips directly within PMax asset groups, using AI to enhance and animate a single source image.

How it works.

  • Upload a source image — a logo, a product shot, a property photo
  • AI generates several “enhanced” versions of that image
  • Each enhanced image produces two animated clips
  • Select up to five animated clips per asset group
  • Note: faces cannot be used in source images, though AI may generate people in enhanced versions

Early results from testing. A logo generated a spinning animation of the image element. A house with a sold sign produced a slow cinematic pan. Simple inputs, but the output quality appears usable for display advertising without any video production required.

Where the ads appear. Google hasn’t provided in-product documentation on placement, but early testing shows animated clips surfacing in Display ad previews when added to an asset group.

Why we care. Video assets continue to be a strong creative option on Paid Media — but producing video has always required time, budget, and resources many advertisers don’t have. This feature effectively removes that barrier — turning a single product photo or logo into animated display creative in seconds, at no additional production cost.

For advertisers who’ve been running PMax on static images alone, this could be a meaningful and easy win.

The bottom line. This feature is still unconfirmed by Google, but advertisers running PMax should check their asset groups now. If it’s available in your account, it’s worth testing — especially for campaigns that have been running on static images alone.

First seen. Kuhlman shared spotting this new feature on LinkedIn.

Read more at Read More

Web Design and Development San Diego

SEO’s biggest threat in 2026? Your own organization

SEO’s biggest threat in 2026? Your own organization

AI tools and visibility have dominated the SEO conversation in the past two years. But while discussions focus on these new technologies, most of the biggest SEO risks in 2026 will come from somewhere else: within your own organization.

Fragmented data, unclear ownership, outdated KPIs, and weak collaboration can quietly destroy even the best strategies. As SEO expands beyond the website and into AI-driven discovery, the role of the SEO team is becoming broader, more influential, and, paradoxically, harder to define.

Here are some of the risks your team should start thinking about now.

Relying too much on AI for everything

Many SEO teams now rely on AI for everything, from generating briefs to analyzing data. That’s often necessary. You can’t spend hours creating a brief when AI can produce something usable in minutes. But that’s also where the risk starts.

AI can generate content quickly, but “acceptable” won’t differentiate you. You still need a clear point of view — what story you’re telling and what unique angle you bring. Without that, your content becomes generic, predictable, and indistinguishable from competitors using the same tools.

The issue is simple: if you ask similar tools similar questions, you’ll get similar answers. And your competitors have access to the same tools.

Some companies try to stand out by training models on proprietary data. In reality, few teams do this at scale. Most prioritize speed over quality.

There’s also risk in using AI for analysis without understanding the data behind it. AI is fast, but it can misinterpret or hallucinate results.

I’ve seen this firsthand. An AI tool hallucinated part of a calculation during an urgent analysis, making every insight that followed incorrect. It only acknowledged the mistake after it was explicitly pointed out.

More broadly, AI excels at identifying patterns. But in SEO, competitive advantage rarely comes from following patterns. The most effective strategies don’t just mirror what everyone else is doing. Sometimes the best opportunity isn’t the obvious one.

AI is reshaping how SEO work gets done, how impact is measured, and whether it can be measured at all.

Dig deeper: Why most SEO failures are organizational, not technical

Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.

The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

Fragmented data and limited visibility

For years, SEO professionals have worked with incomplete datasets. We’ve never had a full view of the user journey. That’s one reason organic impact has often been underestimated. In the past, though, we could still piece together a reasonably clear picture — from ranking to click to conversion.

Today, that picture is far more fragmented. AI tools have changed how people research and discover products. Users now start in AI assistants – asking questions, comparing options, and building shortlists before ever visiting a website. By the time they land on your page, part of the decision-making process is already done.

The problem is we have zero visibility into that journey. If a user discovers your brand through an AI-generated answer, adds you to a shortlist, then later searches for you directly, the signals that influenced that decision are invisible. We only see the final step.

Microsoft Bing has introduced basic reporting for AI searches, but it’s limited. We still can’t see the prompts behind specific page visibility.

At the same time, SEO teams are still expected to prove impact. Some companies are adding questions to lead forms to understand how users discovered them. In theory, this adds signal. In practice, it depends on accurate self-reporting. I know how I fill out forms, so I question how reliable that data really is. Still, it’s a start.

Setting the wrong KPIs

Fragmented data creates another risk: focusing on the wrong KPIs. Stakeholders still ask about traffic. No matter how often SEO teams explain that its role has changed, traffic remains a default measure of success. For years, organic growth meant more sessions, users, and visits. That mindset hasn’t fully shifted.

At the same time, stakeholders are drawn to newer metrics — AI visibility, citations, and mentions. These aren’t inherently wrong, but they need to be used carefully.

Most tools measure AI visibility using a predefined set of queries. That’s where risk creeps in. Teams can become too focused on improving visibility scores, even if it means optimizing for prompts that look good in reports rather than those that matter to the business.

For example, appearing for “What is XYZ software?” isn’t the same as showing up for “Which XYZ software is best?” The first may drive visibility, but the second is much closer to a purchase decision.

To avoid this, visibility metrics need to be tied to business outcomes — a real challenge given the fragmented data problem.

Tracking AI visibility also opens another rabbit hole: debates over which prompts to track, how many to include, and why. This can quickly overcomplicate measurement, especially if teams lose sight of the goal. The objective isn’t to track every phrasing, but to understand the intent behind it. Trying to capture every variation is impossible.

Dig deeper: Why governance maturity is a competitive advantage for SEO

Owning more than you can actually own

SEO teams are expected to own AI visibility strategy much like they owned SEO strategy. But strategy is often treated as execution.

Even in the past, SEO was never fully independent. It relied on other teams — engineering to implement changes and content to create pages. The difference is that most of this work used to happen on the company’s own website.

That’s no longer true. Visibility in AI answers requires presence beyond your domain — Reddit threads, YouTube videos, and media mentions all play a role.

This significantly expands the scope of work. At the same time, many of these surfaces don’t have clear owners inside organizations. Even when they do, there’s a tendency to assume that if SEO owns the strategy, it should also own execution or at least be accountable for outcomes.

The opposite happens, too. If other teams own execution, they may take ownership of the entire strategy. In reality, neither model works well.

SEO teams can’t manage every platform that influences AI visibility. They don’t have the expertise to produce YouTube content or run PR campaigns. Their strength is knowing what works and helping optimize it. For example, advising on how a video should be structured to perform on YouTube.

Owning strategy also doesn’t mean deciding who owns execution. That’s a leadership responsibility. It requires visibility across teams and the authority to assign ownership. Otherwise, one team is left deciding how its peers should operate.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


Lack of cross-team collaboration

Even when companies recognize the importance of AI visibility, cross-team collaboration remains a challenge.

Roles and processes are often unclear. SEO teams may expect others to execute, while those teams assume it’s SEO’s responsibility. In other cases, teams don’t prioritize AI visibility because their KPIs focus elsewhere.

This is where leadership alignment becomes critical. If AI visibility is truly a strategic priority, it needs to be reflected in goals and KPIs across all relevant teams. When AI-related KPIs sit only with SEO, it creates an imbalance: one team is accountable for outcomes, while execution depends on many others.

Many teams are also unsure how to work with SEO. Some don’t involve SEO early enough. Others choose not to follow recommendations because they don’t agree with them.

SEO teams share responsibility here, too. They need to actively onboard other teams and clearly connect SEO efforts to broader business goals. It’s our job to show that lack of visibility means lost revenue.

I’ve seen cases where teams critical to AI visibility hadn’t even read the strategy document. In these situations, the issue isn’t one-sided. Teams need to understand what’s expected of them, and SEO needs to push for alignment and involve stakeholders early. Simply moving forward without that alignment doesn’t work.

SEO teams also don’t always explain the “why.” AI visibility can end up treated as a standalone SEO metric rather than a business driver. Even when there’s agreement on its importance, a lack of clear processes, shared goals, and training keeps collaboration inconsistent.

Dig deeper: Why 2026 is the year the SEO silo breaks and cross-channel execution starts

Too much strategy, not enough doing

With rapid changes in search, SEO teams often spend more time on theory — reading, analyzing, building frameworks, and refining strategies — instead of making changes to the website.

That doesn’t mean teams should stop learning. Quite the opposite. But strategy without execution quickly loses value. In many organizations, SEO teams are expected to produce in-depth strategy documents meant to align teams and define priorities. In reality, many go unread outside the SEO team. They require significant effort but deliver little impact.

Part of the problem is that strategies are often too theoretical. They explain the why but miss the what. The value of a strategy isn’t the document, but the actions that follow. Other teams need to understand what to do and how to contribute.

AI is also accelerating how quickly search evolves. Waiting months to test ideas no longer works. A more practical approach is to understand the direction, implement changes, observe results, and iterate. Smaller experiments often lead to faster learning.

When SEO succeeds, SEO disappears

SEO has always been a consulting function. Success depends on collaboration with teams like engineering, content, and product. Today, that dynamic is more visible than ever. In many cases, SEO teams don’t execute directly. Their role is to enable others.

In mature organizations, this works well. Collaboration is strong, and credit is shared. SEO’s consulting role is recognized without forcing the team to own areas outside its expertise. In less mature environments, it can lead to SEO being undervalued or seen as unnecessary.

AI adds another layer. It can generate keyword ideas, outlines, and optimization suggestions, making SEO look deceptively simple, much like writing content. AI lowers the barrier to entry, but it doesn’t replace expertise. Without that expertise, teams produce work that’s technically correct but average.

It’s a familiar pattern: copy-pasting a Screaming Frog SEO Spider error list into a task doesn’t demonstrate real understanding. This creates a paradox. The more SEO becomes a company-wide capability, the more the SEO team risks becoming invisible.

Dig deeper: SEO execution: Understanding goals, strategy, and planning

See the complete picture of your search visibility.

Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

SEO is evolving, but are companies ready?

SEO teams won’t fail in 2026 because of a lack of knowledge. They’ll fail if they can’t turn that knowledge into action, influence, and business impact.

The challenge is no longer just optimizing pages. It’s building processes, partnerships, and measurement models that reflect how visibility works today.

Success also depends on leadership support. Many of the biggest risks are structural — fragmented data, unclear ownership, weak collaboration, outdated KPIs, and the gap between strategy and execution.

AI visibility expands beyond the website and into the broader organization. That doesn’t make SEO less important, but it does make it harder to define, measure, and defend.

The companies that succeed will stop treating SEO as a traffic function and start treating it as a business capability that drives visibility, discovery, and growth.

Read more at Read More

Web Design and Development San Diego

Apple is bringing ads to Apple Maps this summer

Apple

Apple is preparing to introduce sponsored listings in Apple Maps, marking a significant expansion of its advertising business beyond the App Store.

How it will work. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, the system will function similarly to Google Maps — allowing retailers and brands to bid for ad slots against search queries. Sponsored businesses will appear in Maps search results, much like sponsored apps already appear in App Store searches.

The timeline. An announcement could come as early as this month, with ads beginning to appear inside Maps as early as this summer across iPhone, other Apple devices, and the web version.

Why Apple is doing this. Advertising is a growing and high-margin revenue stream for Apple’s services business. Maps — with its massive built-in user base across Apple devices — is a natural next step, particularly as location-based advertising continues to grow.

Why we care. Apple Maps has a massive built-in user base across iPhone and Apple devices, and users searching within Maps are expressing clear, high-intent signals — they’re actively looking for somewhere to go or something to buy. This opens up a brand new location-based advertising channel that previously didn’t exist on Apple’s platform, giving local businesses and retailers a way to reach those users at exactly the right moment.

Advertisers already running Google Maps or local search campaigns should pay close attention, as this could quickly become a significant complementary channel.

The privacy angle. True to Apple’s form, a user’s location and the ads they see and interact with in Maps are not associated with their Apple Account. Personal data stays on the user’s device, is not collected or stored by Apple, and is not shared with third parties.

How to access it. Businesses will be able to access a fully automated experience for creating ads through Apple Business in a few simple steps. Current Apple Ads advertisers and agencies will also have the option to book ads through their existing Apple Ads experience, which will offer additional customization options.

What you need to do now. When Apple Business becomes available in April, businesses will need to first claim their location on Maps apple before ads become available this summer — so the time to get set up is now, not when the auction opens.

The bottom line. Apple Maps ads should open up a high-intent, location-based channel that hasn’t existed before on Apple’s platform. Advertisers running local or retail campaigns should claim their Maps listing now and start planning budgets for a summer launch. Early entrants in a new ad auction typically benefit from lower competition before the market matures.

Update 10:45 ET: Apple has officially confirmed that ads are coming to Apple Maps this summer, as part of a broader new platform called Apple Business launching April 14.

Read more at Read More

Web Design and Development San Diego

Bing Webmaster Tools now links AI queries to cited pages

AI connection map

Microsoft added query-to-page mapping to its AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools, letting you connect AI grounding queries directly to cited URLs.

Why we care. The original dashboard showed queries and pages separately, limiting optimization. Now you can tie specific AI-triggering queries to the exact cited pages, so you can prioritize updates based on real AI-driven demand — not guesses.

The details. The new Grounding Query–Page Mapping feature links two existing views in the AI Performance dashboard:

  • Click a grounding query to see which pages are cited
  • Click a page to see which grounding queries drive its citations
  • Mapping is many-to-many: one query can map to multiple pages, and vice versa

Catch up quick. Microsoft launched the AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools in February as its first GEO-focused dashboard. It:

  • Tracks where and how often your content is cited in AI answers across Bing, Copilot, and partners.
  • Shows grounding queries, cited URLs, and visibility trends over time.
  • Focuses on citation visibility — not clicks, rankings, or traffic.

What they’re saying. Microsoft said the update responds to “strong positive customer feedback and numerous requests.”

The announcement. The addition of query-to-page mapping to Bing Webmaster Tools appeared in a Microsoft Advertising blog post: The AI Performance dashboard: Your view into where your brand appears across the AI web

Read more at Read More