Posts

Putting Google Ads AI Max’s automated ad copy to the test

Putting Google Ads AI Max’s automated ad copy to the test

One of AI Max’s capabilities is creating assets for you. This can take the strain off the PPC team by reducing the need to customize ads for every single ad group.

We wanted to quantify how well the text customization feature worked for various companies, so we ran tests with three different companies to understand how much we should or shouldn’t be using text customization.

As we’re a software company that helps companies manage their PPC accounts, not the agency doing the work, we worked with the companies to guide them on how to set up and analyze the tests.

We’ll start by examining the process we used to help the companies set up the tests so you can run this experiment yourself, and then we’ll examine the test results.

Text customization and messaging restrictions

Before you run this test, you need to understand the features involved.

First, you need to turn on AI Max and the text customization feature. 

Google Ads AI Max - Asset optimization

Since this is AI working in the background for you, it can tailor the assets in every single ad group to the keywords in that group. While this sounds nice, the assets can sometimes be used to run promotions or advertise products and services you don’t offer.

To help guide the system, you should apply messaging restrictions when using auto-created assets.

Google Ads AI Max - Text guidelines

Messaging restrictions can help guide the system on what the ads should and shouldn’t say. In addition, you can give it rules around your brand guidelines.

The overall process for creating good messaging restrictions is fairly simple and only takes an hour or two:

  • Use a prompt in Gemini to create your initial assets.
  • Then use a prompt to make the ads overly promotional, create promises you don’t like, etc. Essentially, you’re having the system write ads you don’t approve of and want to ensure Google doesn’t create assets like these on your behalf.
  • Create messaging restrictions to stop the assets you don’t like from being generated.
  • Use a prompt to create new, highly promotional ads with your messaging restrictions until all created assets fit your company’s messaging guidelines.

Dig deeper: Is your account ready for Google AI Max? A pre-test checklist

See exactly how your competitors win.

Uncover the keywords, ads, landing pages, and strategies driving your competitors’ paid search success—and find your next opportunity to outperform them.

Analyze your competitors

Choosing the campaigns to test

We wanted to see how these assets performed across different types of companies and different levels of campaign optimization.

Therefore, we first chose three business types:

  • Ecommerce.
  • B2B lead gen.
  • B2C lead gen.

In each account, we only wanted campaigns that met a specific set of criteria:

  • Did not use brand keywords.
  • Spent at least $20,000 per month.
  • Had at least 100 ad groups.

Most companies have some campaigns that are their best performers, where the team spends a lot of time optimizing the campaigns. Then you have your campaigns that are long-tail, do well in aggregate, but receive less attention.

To understand how well text customization was going to perform, we used two campaigns that were highly watched and two that were somewhat neglected from each account. 

We also wanted to see how the new assets performed, so we chose campaigns that didn’t rely heavily on pinning, which excluded many of the highest-spending campaigns, since most large and enterprise companies extensively use pinning in their top campaigns.

Finally, we wanted to test only the assets, not URL expansion, so none of the campaigns used the final URL expansion feature.

Asset review

As you run these tests, you’ll want to monitor the auto-created assets and remove any that don’t align with your brand messaging or offers.

When looking for AI-generated assets, it’s essential that you change the default filters to include the ad, as this filter isn’t chosen by default. 

Google Ads AI Max - Asset review filters

The companies in the test monitored these assets as they were created and removed them before they received many impressions. Ignoring the B2B results (more on that later), approximately 19% of the auto-created assets were removed.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


The results

Ecommerce campaigns

This ecommerce company sells over 100,000 SKUs, so it has a lot of products, and many users are accustomed to visiting the website and searching again if the landing page doesn’t have the specific product they’re looking for.

At first glance, it appeared that both AI Max and text customization were incredibly successful.

Google Ads AI Max - Ecommerce

However, after further analysis, we found that AI Max was poaching impressions, clicks, and conversions from other campaigns and that the overall revenue for the account declined. 

The company added many search terms as keywords to help Google prioritize the correct ad group and campaign. Then it added more negative keywords and audience lists to slow cannibalization and reran the tests.

We observed that AI text customization wasn’t as effective as human management of assets for highly optimized campaigns. However, it was good at assisting the long-tail campaign.

Dig deeper: Why your brand campaign may not be ready for AI Max

B2B lead generation

When creating RSA assets for B2B companies, one of the most important considerations is how to properly prequalify your audience through your asset usage. You want your ads to be unattractive to B2C searchers and appeal to B2B searchers.

This company had previously used pinning quite extensively across its assets to ensure this qualification. However, it wanted to see how well Google could optimize its accounts, so it removed its pins during this test.

The nuance of prequalifying a B2B audience is one that text customization clearly doesn’t understand. The B2B accounts saw their CTRs skyrocket. However, the conversion rates declined significantly since the ads were attracting many B2C searchers.

Google Ads AI Max - B2B lead generation

The messaging restrictions included language to ensure the assets prequalified users as part of a B2B audience. While some of the assets met this criterion, the overall ads that were shown to users didn’t properly appeal to B2B buyers.

The other tests ran for over a month. However, after three weeks, the results were so poor that this company stopped the tests and went back to pinning its ads and removing the auto-created assets. Within a week, its results returned to their pretest levels.

B2C lead generation

Our last test was with a B2C lead generation company that localizes its ads through geographic ad copy or geographic insertion.

Its optimized campaigns had tailored ad copy for the keywords in every single ad group. Its long-tail campaign had a few headline assets in each ad group, tailored to the keywords, but most assets were reused across ad groups.

Seeing formulaic ad copy in lower-priority campaigns is quite common, and this is where we were hoping to see AI auto-created assets perform well, since there was a lot of opportunity for better ads.

Google Ads AI Max - B2C lead generation

AI Max auto-created assets didn’t disappoint in these low-priority campaigns. While these assets didn’t outperform the assets humans had spent a lot of time testing in their top campaigns, AI performed quite well for the long-tail campaign.

Every click they win is a customer you lose.

See where competitors are investing, which keywords drive their results, and how to capture more of the market.

See who’s stealing your traffic

Where AI Max automated assets work best

AI is a fantastic tool at your disposal. For ads where you’re spending a lot of time thinking through your messaging, it can be good at helping you generate ideas, but human-created assets still outperform AI-generated assets.

If you need specific types of assets, such as prequalifying users for B2B audiences, specific offers, or short-term promotions, then you should take control of the assets yourself and not turn them over to AI.

However, auto-created assets shine when you just don’t have enough time to fully optimize your creatives. Using AI to create your assets, assuming you have good messaging restrictions and regularly review these assets, can help your overall performance.

We’re still a long way from AI being a turn-on-and-forget setting. It needs babysitting and oversight. However, having AI do the heavy lifting in areas where you don’t have the time to fully optimize, and then spending your time reviewing and tweaking the outcomes, is the best use of AI in ad creation.

Read more at Read More

How SEO reduces blended customer acquisition costs

How SEO reduces blended customer acquisition costs

For every dollar you spend on SEO, how much do you get in return?

Impressions, clicks, rankings, and query growth can show the results of SEO activity. But they don’t tell executives what they need to understand: how much it costs to acquire a customer (CAC), how that cost changes as SEO efforts continue, and whether overall acquisition efficiency is improving.

The challenge is that SEO rarely operates within the clean boundaries that a channel-level CAC calculation implies.

SEO creates entry points across the customer journey and influences other acquisition channels along the way. Its value, then, isn’t only in the customers directly attributed to organic search. It’s also in how SEO can make the broader acquisition system more efficient.

The reality of acquiring a customer

A user may first find a company through a nonbrand search, return through paid search, compare alternatives through content found in ChatGPT, sign up for a newsletter on the website, read through guides for a week, and then finally convert through the owned channel.

The final conversion might be attributed to email. Paid search may receive some credit for the return visit. The original organic discovery may disappear from the standard report entirely.

But SEO still influenced the acquisition and may have reduced its total cost.

CAC can be measured by individual channel or across channels as blended CAC. CAC expectations vary considerably by channel:

  • Paid search.
  • Paid social.
  • Email.
  • SEO.

Be the brand customers find first.

Track, grow, and measure your visibility across Google, AI search, social, local, and every channel that influences buying decisions.

Start your free trial

Paid search captures high-intent demand

Paid search may have the cleanest attribution. Users search for solutions to their problems, product terms, categories, or other related queries. You pay for the click, and a percentage of those clicks convert.

From there, you get spend / customers acquired = paid search CAC.

It’s also usually close to the transaction, which makes it easier to credit regardless of other factors, such as whether paid social may have warmed the audience first.

A user who clicks a search ad may already know the brand through social campaigns, podcast appearances, how-to guides, recommendations, or competitor research. The demand is high-intent, and paid search captures its final expression.

Paid social influences demand earlier

Paid social’s impact on CAC is often indirect because its primary strengths are creating awareness, warming audiences, building retargeting or feeder pools, and connecting users with problems they may want to solve before they’re ready to buy.

It’s unlikely that your users are scrolling on Instagram thinking, “I would like to spend some money right now.”

But seeing a product address their problem during their free time may make the brand more familiar when they later search for a solution at work, improving blended CAC efficiency.

If you looked only at paid social as spend / customers acquired = paid social CAC, you’d probably cut the budget. But then, if you look at what it does to paid or branded search CAC through holdout tests, you’d potentially restart the social budget after seeing the overall acquisition engine decline.

It’s a form of incrementality. Experiments compare exposed and unexposed groups to estimate how much additional activity a marketing investment produces instead of simply assigning credit to the last recorded touchpoint.

Email depends on other acquisition channels

Lifecycle channels like email work differently. If you own an audience through email capture and you look at converting them into paid users or continuous purchasers, you can think of email CAC along the lines of cost of email program / converted customer value.

But then you still have to run paid to capture the emails in the first place, or you need a strong SEO presence to do so. The apparent efficiency is highly dependent on other channels.

SEO touches all of these channels, and all of these channels can influence SEO in return. For example, a paid social campaign could generate 100 brand mentions that benefit your overall organic visibility.

Together, they create a connected acquisition system.

Dig deeper: SEO and PPC alignment starts with your org chart

Attribution models don’t fix the problem

It sounds like the solution is a better attribution model, and then SEOs can speak about CAC more effectively and get more budget. But there are still limitations.

Last-click attribution would just give credit to the final measurable source. First-click would just give credit to the initial source. Linear or position-based models distribute credit, and data-driven attribution would observe data to estimate what contributed most.

Data-driven attribution may improve reporting, but it remains a model rather than a complete record of the customer journey.

Because how do you evaluate interactions that aren’t observed, identified, or connected to a user’s journey? There are deleted cookies, consent restrictions, cross-device behavior, long sales cycles depending on your niche, offline conversions, and that list of limitations could go on for a while.

So, regardless of your attribution model, it doesn’t always provide a complete record of causality and shouldn’t be treated as such. This further reinforces that acquisition is a system, not an isolated channel.

As the search ecosystem changes, even more of SEO’s influence is becoming difficult to observe.

Dig deeper: Why first-touch analytics matters more than ever for SEO

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


SEO’s influence is becoming harder to observe

Measuring CAC for SEO as an isolated channel is becoming increasingly difficult.

SparkToro’s analysis of Similarweb clickstream data found that 68.01% of U.S. Google searches ended without a click during the first four months of 2026. In 2024, the figure was 60.45%, representing an increase of roughly 7.6 percentage points in two years.

Users can still see a company in an AI Overview, read a search snippet, or engage in other behaviors, but fewer and fewer are measured through impression → click → conversion.

SEO still influences these interactions, but its impact may appear smaller in a dashboard.

There’s also significant overlap between SEO efforts and AI visibility, depending on which agency or existential hill you’re standing on.

SEO leans out blended CAC

SEO’s biggest advantage is that its financial returns can compound. A paid campaign stops sending traffic to the website when the budget stops, but a strong organic presence can continue creating entry points long after the initial investment.

If you build topical authority across a category with meaningful demand, the cost to maintain that visibility, including the costs of keeping up with competitors, is often lower than continuously buying the same demand through paid search.

That could include technical improvements, content production, digital PR, product pages, and ongoing optimization.

During the first few months, the program may appear inefficient from a CAC perspective because the investment occurs before returns materialize. Then, as visibility grows, that same work starts to increase customer volume while spend stabilizes at maintenance levels, and CAC decreases.

That’s one way SEO leans out blended CAC. It does this by:

  • Creating nonpaid entry points into the funnel.
  • Capturing demand that paid would otherwise have to buy.
  • Supporting paid search and paid social conversion.
  • Increasing branded and direct demand over time.
  • Educating buyers before sales conversations.
  • Improving conversion through comparison, use-case, and objection-handling content.
  • Feeding owned channels like email.
  • Reducing support and retention friction through product and help content.

When considering the impact, it can be true that SEO is among the more efficient levers for reducing a business’s blended CAC.

Dig deeper: 3 ways to build a more complete SEO ROI model

Own the conversation before your competitors.

See where your brand appears, where it doesn’t, and exactly how to win more visibility across search, AI, local, social, and every channel that matters.

Start your free trial

Reframe the SEO investment conversation

The attribution model can point to various channels as the highest-performing, but the organic infrastructure may be contributing to that performance.

That’s where SEOs should point when reframing the conversation.

Instead of answering how much you get in return for every dollar spent on SEO, consider how much more money you’ll have to spend on other channels for every dollar not spent on SEO.

If SEO is doing its job, it’s part of a cohesive system, and its role is to increase volume while reducing blended costs.

SEO teams should still report channel CAC when the data allows, but executives should evaluate it alongside influenced pipeline, replacement costs, and changes in blended acquisition efficiency.

Read more at Read More

Why creator content belongs in your AI search strategy

Why creator content belongs in your AI search strategy

Creator content increasingly informs AI answers.

After all, a large language model (LLM) can’t have an opinion. It can’t decide whether your product is the best moisturizer or the water softener that’s the best value.

So when someone asks a subjective question, an LLM borrows a point of view from wherever humans have already shared one. Reviews, community threads, editorial content, retailer pages, and creator content guide these answers.

Various teams own all of those sources. This makes showing up in AI answers less of a content creation issue and more of a coordination problem.

AI needs opinions to build out answers

In Tinuiti’s Q1 2026 AI Citation Trends Report (Disclosure: I’m the senior director of AI SEO innovation at Tinuiti), we found that roughly 82% of AI citations pointed to earned media, not a brand’s own site.

Creators are a fast-rising component of that mix. If you take a look at YouTube’s search engine results page (SERP) presence, inclusion in Google AI Overviews grew from 3.6 million to 36.2 million keywords year over year. That’s likely partially due to the increase in AI Overviews.

Yet YouTube visibility across the entire SERP has been evolving for a long time. Video has now become a format AI uses when it needs to explain or validate something.

Dig deeper: AI search engines cite Reddit, YouTube and LinkedIn most: Study

Be the brand AI recommends.

See where your brand appears in AI search, where competitors are winning, and what it takes to become the answer AI recommends.

See your AI visibility

Social’s citation share swings hard by category

It’s tempting to invest in creators across industries, but the data doesn’t necessarily support that approach. In our Q2 2026 AI Citation Trends Report, social platforms drove about 13% of AI citations on apparel prompts — but only 3% on over-the-counter health.

Social citation trends move quickly. For example, Perplexity’s share of citations from social media fell from 31% to 13% in a single quarter as it pulled back from Reddit.

The social platforms that matter in each category continue to evolve, too. This requires deeper research into where LLMs source conversations. That’s exactly why a single team watching one social channel can’t see the whole picture.

Dig deeper: Why AI visibility starts before search and ends with citations

Traditional search has been signaling to social for a while

It would be easy to file all of this under AI search. But I’d argue it’s a pattern Google has been building toward as consumer behavior has moved to social.

In 2025, the search engine began automatically adding social media links to Google Business Profiles at scale. This update began surfacing brands’ recent posts right on their profiles.

Google has also started to display a short videos block on SERPs and within the search bar. This block includes vertical clips under five minutes, pulled from sources like Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.

Based on Semrush organic research data for the past year (U.S.), YouTube’s estimated organic traffic roughly doubled. It’s now Google’s single largest organic domain. Meanwhile, organic traffic climbed by about 60% for both Facebook and Instagram.

Google keeps building surfaces to ingest, display, and now measure social conversations. If we use trends to help inform predictions, I think it’s safe to say there’s high value in social conversations and content, in the spirit of search everywhere optimization strategies.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


The creators winning citations aren’t who you’d expect

The content that wins YouTube citations isn’t the obvious kind. Long-form video accounts for 94% of AI citation, with 40.83% of cited videos having fewer than 1,000 views, OtterlyAI’s YouTube Citation Study 2026 found.

This indicates that popularity doesn’t predict citation value. Instead, structure does.

Mid-size niche creators tend to make well-structured content. These videos typically have clear titles, clean formatting, and a specific focus.

  • Comparison videos.
  • Honest reviews of a category.
  • How-to-style videos.
  • Skincare routines.
  • Tutorials for SaaS.

The sentiment that these videos express also affects AI search. In one client program, when mid-size creators published genuine review content, their language began appearing in citations for branded prompts and in our sentiment theme occurrence rates. A YouTube review and a blog each reached roughly 0.23% citation share on a target term, and it’s kept climbing.

AI search leans on creator content because it’s authentic and not branded. As a result, flooding search with citation bait breaks the very thing that makes it useful. The teams doing this well scale creator content when there’s a real idea or a brand story worth reinforcing.

Dig deeper: How AI-driven shopping discovery changes product page optimization

The real unlock is one shared objective

Most organizations run influencer and SEO on separate budgets, chasing distinct goals with reach and engagement over here and rankings over there. Instead, they should point teams at the same target and encourage them to exchange insights.

The influencer team gets to see its real role in search, while the SEO team brings citation data and measurement. Micro-influencers and repeated sentiment themes can matter as much as any single high-reach post. Shared reporting can show which creator content is influencing search and help both teams make better decisions.

Our tooling is catching up. In July, Google introduced platform properties in Search Console. This feature lets you track how your Instagram, TikTok, X, and YouTube content performs in Google Search, including the queries that send people to your posts. These insights can make creator choices evidence-based instead of instinctive.

Dig deeper: Why 2026 is the year the SEO silo breaks and cross-channel execution starts

Align your narrative across the content about your brand

Creator content is only one part of what AI engines encounter when forming a picture of your brand. They also draw from content, PR, commerce, social, affiliate, video, and paid.

When those sources reinforce the same narrative, AI models get a clearer picture. Creators are a smart place to start because they’re a growing source of opinions and experiences AI engines draw from.

The opportunity goes beyond any one channel. It’s about giving AI engines a consistent story about your brand wherever they look.

Read more at Read More

Ubersuggest Is Now Inside ChatGPT. Here’s What It Does

If you use ChatGPT for your marketing (content ideas, outlines, copy, strategy), you’ve probably run into the same wall: the AI doesn’t know what’s actually ranking. It doesn’t know how competitive a keyword is. It doesn’t know whether 500 monthly searches is high or low for your industry. It doesn’t know if your competitors are already dominating a topic.

You could paste data in manually. But that means switching to Ubersuggest, pulling a report, copying the numbers, and going back. Every time. For every question.

That gap is now closed.

The Ubersuggest homepage.

Ubersuggest is now an official app inside ChatGPT. When you use it, ChatGPT calls Ubersuggest in real time to fetch live SEO data (keyword volumes, difficulty scores, related keywords, SERP snapshots) and weaves the results directly into the conversation. You ask. ChatGPT fetches. You get an answer built on actual data.

What the Ubersuggest ChatGPT App Does

The Ubersuggest ChatGPT app is a native integration built using OpenAI’s App platform and Model Context Protocol (MCP). Not a browser extension. Not a workaround. A first-party connection that lets ChatGPT call Ubersuggest’s APIs directly during your conversation.

Ubersuggest in ChatGPT.

What’s Live Right Now: Keyword Research

The first capability is live keyword research. When you ask ChatGPT a question that requires keyword data, the app fetches it in real time from Ubersuggest’s database of over 100 million keywords. This includes:

  • Search volume: actual monthly search data, not estimates based on training data
  • Keyword difficulty: a 0-100 score showing how competitive a keyword is to rank for
  • Related keywords: semantically related terms you might be missing
  • Keyword suggestions: variations and long-tail opportunities based on your seed keyword
  • SERP data: who’s currently ranking for a term and what types of content dominate the results

What’s Coming Next

The Ubersuggest ChatGPT app is launching in phases. Keyword research is live now. Coming soon:

  • Domain analysis: pull traffic estimates, top pages, and organic keyword counts for any domain
  • Backlink analysis: check referring domains, link authority, and new/lost link history
  • Site audit: surface technical SEO issues directly in your ChatGPT conversation
  • Content research: get content ideas and SEO scores without leaving the chat
  • Projects: access your rank tracking data and keyword position history
  • Utilities: SERP data, intent classification, and keyword expansion tools

Why This Is Different from Just Asking ChatGPT for Keywords

ChatGPT is excellent at reasoning, pattern recognition, and language. But it has a fundamental limitation when it comes to SEO data: it’s working from training data, not live search data.

When you ask ChatGPT what keywords to target, it’s generating plausible answers based on patterns in its training corpus. It’s not querying an actual keyword database. It doesn’t know current search volumes. It doesn’t know what’s ranking right now.

The Ubersuggest ChatGPT app solves this by making ChatGPT’s SEO answers data-grounded. ChatGPT still does the reasoning, strategy, and language. Ubersuggest provides the live facts it’s reasoning from. The combination is more useful than either alone.

A Real Example

Without the Ubersuggest app: You ask for long-tail keywords for your home cleaning service. ChatGPT gives you a list of logical-sounding phrases. No volume, no difficulty, no way to know if any have real traffic worth pursuing.

With the Ubersuggest app: ChatGPT queries Ubersuggest and presents real data in context: “‘house cleaning service Austin’ has 880 monthly searches with difficulty 32, achievable for a newer site. ‘One-time cleaning Austin’ has 480 searches with difficulty 19, a lower-competition entry point. Here’s the full breakdown…”

Same question. Completely different answer.

Asking a query using Ubersuggest in ChatGPT.

How Ubersuggest Compares to Semrush’s ChatGPT Integration

Semrush launched their ChatGPT integration in December 2025, available to Business, Pro, Plus, Guru, and Enterprise plan subscribers, at prices that put it out of reach for most solo operators and small teams.

The Ubersuggest ChatGPT app takes a different approach: available to any Ubersuggest user, on any plan, including free. You don’t need an enterprise license. You don’t need to upgrade. If you have a ChatGPT account and an Ubersuggest account, you’re set.

How to Set Up the Ubersuggest ChatGPT App

Setup takes under a minute:

  1. Open the Ubersuggest app page at app.neilpatel.com/en/chatgpt-app
  2. Sign in to ChatGPT. Free or paid account, any tier works.
  3. Authorize the connection with your Ubersuggest credentials via OAuth.
ChatGPT being linked to Ubersuggest.
  1. Start your conversation. No special commands needed.

10 Prompts to Run Immediately After Setup

  • “What are the best long-tail keywords for [your topic] with under 40 difficulty and over 300 monthly searches?”
  • “What’s the search volume trend for [keyword] over the last 12 months? Growing or declining?”
  • “Compare the keyword difficulty for these 5 keywords. Which is the best entry point for a new blog?”
  • “Give me 20 related keywords for [seed keyword], sorted by lowest difficulty first.”
  • “What types of content are ranking on page 1 for [keyword]? Blog posts, product pages, or something else?”
  • “I’m writing a content plan for a [niche] site. Suggest 10 keywords with volume 200-2,000 and difficulty under 35.”
  • “What question-based keywords exist around [topic] that I could answer in a FAQ section?”
  • “I want to rank for [keyword]. How competitive is it, and what does my content need to beat the top results?”
  • “Give me a keyword cluster around [main topic]: one pillar keyword and 8 supporting long-tail variations.”
  • “What’s the CPC for [keyword]? Is there paid demand here that signals commercial intent?”

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Ubersuggest ChatGPT app free?

Yes. Connect it with a free Ubersuggest account and a free ChatGPT account. Data depth may vary by Ubersuggest plan tier.

Does this work on mobile ChatGPT?

The app works on web, mobile, and desktop ChatGPT, anywhere you access ChatGPT with your account.

Is my data secure?

Yes. The connection uses OAuth 2.0. No passwords are shared. Ubersuggest only receives the queries your session generates. No account data or personal information is exposed beyond what’s needed to answer your query.

When are domain analysis and backlink features launching?

The team is rolling out additional capabilities in phases. Check app.neilpatel.com/en/chatgpt-app for the latest.

Looking to take advantage of this functionality? You can add Ubersuggest to ChatGPT in under a minute on any plan, completely free to start. Follow the link here to add Ubersuggest to ChatGPT,

Read more at Read More

How to build curiosity into high-performing social ads

How to build curiosity into high-performing social ads

Capturing attention is no longer enough to create high-performing social ads. You also need to create curiosity that keeps people watching.

Stopping the scroll and hooking viewers in the first three seconds still matter. But as video-heavy platforms like Meta and TikTok continue investing in AI-powered delivery systems that optimize for engagement, watch time, and downstream conversions, what happens next matters, too.

Attention is the moment someone notices your ad. Curiosity is the reason they stick around instead of scrolling. Understanding that difference can help you build creative that earns both attention and consideration.

Attention is only the beginning

Many creative briefs I’ve seen begin with questions like “what’s our hook?” or “how do we stop the scroll?” While these questions matter, they focus almost entirely on the first few seconds of the ad, not how to maintain that fleeting attention in the seconds that follow.

Every piece of content on social media is competing for attention, and platforms are becoming increasingly better at predicting what users are most likely to engage with next.

A flashy visual, a bold headline, or an unexpected opening can earn a pause, but if the rest of your creative immediately answers every question or transitions into a predictable sales pitch, people will scroll onward.

High-performing creative doesn’t just interrupt the scroll. It creates a gap in information that people want to close. That’s curiosity.

Dig deeper: How to measure paid social’s impact on paid search performance

See exactly how your competitors win.

Uncover the keywords, ads, landing pages, and strategies driving your competitors’ paid search success—and find your next opportunity to outperform them.

Analyze your competitors

Curiosity keeps the algorithms working for you

As user behavior changes and algorithms evolve, platforms increasingly reward signals that indicate genuine user interest. These signals include:

  • Longer watch times.
  • Meaningful engagement (e.g., saves and sharing videos via DMs).
  • Higher video completion rates.
  • Clicks that occur after viewing the content.
  • Replays.

Platforms use these signals to identify content that people choose to spend their time with. Human curiosity naturally produces these signals because it encourages viewers to keep watching rather than scroll until something else grabs their attention.

The highest-performing creator ads often don’t feel rushed. They gradually reveal information through conversation, yapper-style content, demonstrations, storytelling, and personal experiences.

While the goal may be to secure a conversion quickly, sometimes slow and steady wins the race. A thoughtfully curated approach invites viewers to discover something new rather than asking them to purchase right away.

The rise of curiosity-driven creators

One recent creative shift is the growing popularity of longer-form, conversational creator ads called “yapper ads.” These ads are longer, less polished, more authentic, often unscripted, and sometimes don’t even mention the product immediately.

They seem to violate nearly every traditional best practice, but they perform well because they stand out, feel like conversations rather than commercials, and create curiosity throughout the video. They often address what happened next, why something solved a problem, and whether something would work well for the viewer.

Creators who do this well reward the attention they’ve earned with more interesting information throughout the content, and brands that boost these ads are seeing impressive results.

A screenshot of a Meta video ad from Gratsi Wine and creator, Kayce Smith
Source: Gratsi Meta Ads

Dig deeper: Why ugly ads outperform polished creative and how to test them

Don’t improvise curiosity, build it

Curiosity should be intentionally designed because most creators can’t naturally create it on the fly. The creative strategy behind these successful ads is to delay the obvious and gradually reveal information.

To do this, create open loops with a surprising statement, an unexpected result, or a relatable problem that encourages viewers to stay for the outcome. Demonstrate something rather than just describing it, or show a transformation rather than simply listing features.

While this type of content is strategic, it can feel more human and natural by telling stories, answering questions along the way, and perhaps even jumping between thoughts. That conversational rhythm creates authenticity, trust, and ultimately, the momentum you’re aiming for.

Curiosity builds trust while clickbait breaks it

There’s an important distinction between curiosity and manipulation. Clickbait typically withholds information without delivering meaningful value, whereas curiosity rewards attention by eventually answering questions in a way that satisfies the viewer.

Every promise should be fulfilled, and every story should reach a worthwhile conclusion. Don’t trick people into watching longer and create an unpleasant experience. Make every second genuinely worth the viewer’s time because prospective customers will recognize your intent, and their behavior will send signals to the platforms.

Dig deeper: Why search ROAS depends on paid social more than you think

Optimize beyond the first three seconds

The advice has long been to obsess over the first three seconds of every video, and while that advice isn’t wrong, it may be incomplete. Instead of asking only, “Will someone stop scrolling?” creative teams should also ask, “Why would someone keep watching?”

Considering both can improve how creative is written, filmed, edited, and evaluated. Every transition should introduce another point of interest, and every scene should answer one question while creating another without overwhelming the viewer. It should also deliver on the promise to close earlier loops. Don’t just earn attention. Sustain it.

Creative is what you still control

AI has made audience targeting on social media advertising platforms smarter and easier than ever. Campaign setup continues to become more automated and streamlined, while machine learning handles more optimization.

Creative strategy and development remain in your hands. Algorithms can decide who sees an ad, but you can decide whether it’s worth watching. You have the ability to create compelling creative and develop novel ideas that tap into people’s natural curiosity.

That doesn’t mean you should stop trying to earn attention. You also need to sustain it because curiosity is what keeps the conversation going.

Dig deeper: How to structure paid social creative testing for better performance

Read more at Read More

The new SEO rules for bloggers in 2026: Why clarity matters in AI search

The new SEO rules for bloggers in 2026: Why clarity matters in AI search

For years, I told bloggers through audits, podcasts, and live trainings to write their content for “toddlers and drunk adults.”

That was simple advice, and it worked. If a 5-year-old and someone half-paying attention could follow the page content and still find what they needed, the content was probably clear enough for users and Google alike.

But in 2026, that rule needs an update.

Bloggers are no longer writing just for readers skimming on phones, distracted parents trying to make dinner, or travelers planning from an airport terminal.

They’re also writing for large language models, AI Overviews, AI Mode, and search systems that are scanning, summarizing, and deciding whether their content is clear enough to retrieve, cite, or ignore.

That’s the real shift. And as such, my advice to bloggers has evolved to “write for toddlers, drunk adults, and LLMs.”

Google is no longer just asking, “What is the best page to rank for this query?”

Increasingly, it’s asking, “What answer can we construct, what sources support that answer, and what might the user want to do next?”

That changes the job for bloggers.

The old SEO playbook was built around keywords, titles, H2s, and rankings. Those things still matter, but they’re no longer enough by themselves.

The new SEO playbook is built around clarity.

  • Can Google understand who you are?
  • Can users understand what your site is about?
  • Can AI systems understand how your articles connect?
  • Can your content answer the question quickly without making readers dig through clutter, filler, popups, and five nearly identical photos of the same finished dish?

For food, lifestyle, and travel bloggers, this isn’t a small adjustment. It’s a business survival issue.

The bloggers who continue to win won’t be the ones chasing every new acronym, every plugin score, or every AI optimization gimmick.

They’ll be the ones building clearer sites, stronger brands, better internal connections, and more useful content experiences for real people.

In 2026, clarity isn’t just good UX. It’s your SEO strategy.

Be the brand AI recommends.

See where your brand appears in AI search, where competitors are winning, and what it takes to become the answer AI recommends.

See your AI visibility

Why search changed (and why it matters)

For years, most bloggers understood SEO through a pretty simple model.

A user searched for something. Google returned a list of blue links. The blogger’s job was to create the best page for that query and earn the click.

That model still exists. But it’s no longer the only model that matters.

Traditional search mostly asked: “What are the best documents to rank for this query?”

AI search increasingly asks: “What answer can we construct, what sources support that answer, what else might the user need, and what can we help them do next?”

That’s a very different environment.

In classic search, a food blogger trying to rank for “easy chicken enchiladas” mostly had to think about the visible query, the competing pages, the title, the headings, the recipe card, the photos, the intro, the internal links, and the overall usefulness of the page.

Again, those things still matter. But AI search adds another layer.

Google’s AI experiences can use what it calls query fan-out, where a single user query may trigger multiple related searches across subtopics and data sources to build a more complete response.

A search for “easy chicken enchiladas” may also involve questions around cook time, substitutions, whether to use corn or flour tortillas, how to avoid soggy enchiladas, what sauce works best, what to serve with them, how to make them ahead, and whether they freeze well.

In other words, Google may not just be matching one page to one keyword. It may be trying to understand an entire task. That’s the shift bloggers need to internalize.

The old SEO model looked something like this: Keyword → title → H2s → rank.

The modern SEO model looks more like this: Topic clarity → answer clarity → entity clarity → internal links → technical crawlability → structured data accuracy → firsthand experience → brand trust → direct audience.

That’s not as catchy. But it’s a lot closer to how search works now.

For bloggers, this means Google needs to understand more than the fact that you published a recipe, tutorial, itinerary, or guide. It needs to understand:

  • Who you are and what your site is about.
  • What topics, cuisines, destinations, or lifestyle categories you specialize in.
  • Whether your content is based on real experience.
  • How your articles connect to one another.
  • Whether the page is easy to crawl, read, summarize, and trust.
  • Why your version deserves to be surfaced instead of the dozens, hundreds, or thousands of similar options already online.

This is where many bloggers get uncomfortable. For a long time, blogging SEO rewarded a certain kind of mechanical execution.

  • Find a keyword.
  • Write a long post.
  • Put the keyword in the right places.
  • Add the recipe card.
  • Insert the photos.
  • Answer a few FAQs.
  • Hit publish.

That approach was never as foolproof as people wanted it to be, but it worked often enough that bloggers kept doing it.

AI search makes that weaker because keywords alone are a poor substitute for clarity.

A food blogger who publishes another generic chocolate chip cookie recipe with the same tips, photos, substitutions, and “why you’ll love this” section as everyone else is making Google work too hard.

The same goes for a travel article without firsthand details, original recommendations, strong structure, or clear audience focus, or broad lifestyle advice that could have been produced by any website, freelancer, or AI tool.

That kind of content was already vulnerable. Now it actively works against you for algorithmic consideration.

Google’s own guidance around AI search continues to point bloggers back to the fundamentals: helpful content, crawlability, internal links, page experience, visible textual content, high-quality images, and structured data that matches what users can actually see on the page.

There’s no secret AI SEO template, magic schema type, or plugin setting that suddenly makes unclear content useful.

AI search doesn’t remove the need for good SEO. It raises the cost of bad SEO.

If your content is confusing, your site structure is messy, your internal links are generic, or your experience and author signals are weak, you’re giving Google fewer reasons to understand and trust your content.

And if the only reason a page exists is because a keyword tool said it had search volume, that’s not a strategy. That’s content roulette.

For food, lifestyle, and travel bloggers, the opportunity in 2026 is to become easier to understand – for users, Google, and AI systems.

In an AI-shaped search environment, the winning content isn’t necessarily the longest, loudest, or most aggressively optimized. It’s the content that makes the answer obvious, the expertise clear, and the next step easy.

That’s the foundation for the new SEO rules that actually move the needle.

Dig deeper: AI isn’t the enemy: How bloggers can thrive in a generative search world

The new SEO rules that actually move the needle

When search changes quickly, bad advice gets louder.

Every week, bloggers are being told they need a new AI plugin, a new content template, a new schema trick, a new prompt strategy, a new content score, or a new way to “optimize for AI.” Most of it is noise.

Just last week, a blogger told me, “I was told not to add notes to a recipe card because it’s duplicate content.” And I literally fell out of my chair laughing.

First, that’s not how duplicate content works. Second, “notes” are incredibly important in recipe cards because users often print the card and never return to the full article.

Removing “notes” removes a valuable user-first feature that ensures your users can actually make your recipe perfectly the first time by implementing your “best” advice.

Instead of giving nonsense like this validation, bloggers should focus on making real progress by embracing the boring, obvious, high-impact things better than everyone else.

That starts with three priorities.

1. Improve high-value existing content

Most bloggers don’t need to publish more random content. They need to improve the content that already has signals.

This is one of the biggest differences between mature SEO strategy and “I saw someone say this in a Facebook group” SEO strategy. A mature strategy starts with data.

Go into Google Search Console and identify articles with traffic history, strong impressions, revenue potential, seasonal upside, rankings sitting just outside meaningful visibility, clear signs of decay, or content that hasn’t been meaningfully improved in 12 to 24 months.

That’s where you start.

Not with a random list of articles you personally feel like updating. Not with every recipe that has an old date. Not with whatever your SEO tool says is missing 14 semantically related phrases.

Use Search Console. Look for opportunity. Then make the page better.

Tip: Sign up for an account with SEO Gets. It has a fantastic Content Decay Reporting option, which makes finding and updating your weakest content within GSC a snap.

A real update should improve the experience for the user. It should make the recipe, guide, tutorial, or article clearer, more accurate, more complete, or more useful.

For a food blogger, that may mean adding better testing notes, clearer process shots, more useful substitution guidance, storage information, make-ahead tips, or troubleshooting details.

For a travel blogger, it may mean updating prices, hours, logistics, neighborhood recommendations, transportation details, seasonal considerations, or firsthand observations.

For a lifestyle blogger, it may mean tightening the structure, removing generic filler, adding examples, clarifying steps, or improving the connection between related articles.

What it shouldn’t mean is changing the date and pretending the content is fresh.

A good content update answers one question: “Is this page now more useful than it was before?”

If the answer is no, you didn’t improve the content. You just touched it.

2. Build direct audience channels

Google traffic is rented land, and bloggers need to start treating it that way.

That doesn’t mean Google traffic is bad. For many publishers, organic search is still the largest traffic source, the biggest revenue driver, and the reason their businesses exist in the first place.

But you don’t own that traffic. A ranking can disappear. A featured snippet can vanish. An AI Overview can satisfy more of the query directly in the search results. A SERP layout can shift. A core update can rewrite the competitive landscape overnight.

None of that means bloggers should abandon SEO, but it does mean they need to stop pretending Google is a stable business model by itself. It’s not.

The better approach is to use Google as one discovery channel among many, not the entire foundation of the business.

Search should introduce new people to your brand, but once those people arrive, the goal should be to give them a reason to come back without needing Google as the middleman every time.

That means bloggers need to get more serious about email, branded search, repeat visitors, Pinterest, YouTube, short-form video, Facebook groups, communities, direct partnerships, products, courses, cookbooks, memberships, or whatever audience channel actually makes sense for their niche and bandwidth.

Not every blogger needs to do all of those things. In fact, most shouldn’t.

But every blogger should be asking the same basic question: “If Google sent me fewer clicks tomorrow, how would my audience still find me?”

That question is uncomfortable, but it’s also necessary.

An email list isn’t perfect. Deliverability is annoying. Open rates fluctuate. People unsubscribe. Platforms change. But an email subscriber is still closer to an owned audience than a ranking you rent from Google.

The best question for bloggers in 2026 isn’t just, “How do I get more Google traffic?”

It’s, “How do I make sure the people who find me once can find me again?”

That mindset changes how you write, how you structure your site, how you promote content, and how you think about brand.

A blogger with a recognizable point of view, repeat readers, and a direct audience is in a much stronger position than a blogger whose entire business depends on Google continuing to send traffic at the same rate it did three years ago.

SEO still matters. But it should feed the business. It shouldn’t be the entire business.

3. Make content easier for humans and machines to understand

This is where clarity becomes the strategy.

Google’s guidance around AI search continues to emphasize many of the same fundamentals it has emphasized for years: helpful content, crawlability, internal links, page experience, visible text, images, video, and structured data that matches what users can actually see on the page.

That should tell bloggers something important. There’s no separate magic version of SEO for AI search.

There’s no special “AI search” schema that suddenly makes a mediocre article useful. There’s no plugin setting that turns unclear content into trusted content. There’s just less tolerance for bloated, confusing, poorly structured pages.

For bloggers, making content easier to understand usually means improving the basics that should have mattered all along.

A recipe article should tell readers what they’re making, why the recipe works, what ingredients matter, what substitutions are realistic, what can go wrong, how to store it, and why they should trust your version.

A travel article should make it clear who the itinerary is for, when the advice applies, what has been personally tested, what to book in advance, and what mistakes readers can avoid.

A lifestyle article should be organized enough that a reader can quickly understand the problem, the recommendation, and the next step.

This isn’t about dumbing down content. It’s about removing friction.

A tired parent trying to make dinner doesn’t want to scroll through clutter to find the answer. A traveler standing in an airport doesn’t want to dig through vague storytelling to find the train information. A reader looking for a home project doesn’t want 1,500 words of generic filler before the actual instructions.

And an AI system trying to understand your content doesn’t benefit from bloated intros, weak headings, generic anchor text, mismatched schema, or buried answers either.

This is why I keep telling bloggers to write for toddlers, drunk adults, and LLMs.

The toddler needs the page to be simple enough to follow. The drunk adult needs it to be forgiving enough to skim. The LLM needs structure, context, entities, and relationships that are clear enough to interpret accurately.

If your content works for all three, you’re probably moving in the right direction.

That means using clear top-of-article summaries when they help, headings that guide the reader instead of stuffing keywords, internal links with descriptive anchor text, schema that accurately reflects visible content, and FAQs that answer real questions.

Add to that stronger about me and author signals, original images or process shots where they add value, and a page experience that doesn’t actively fight the reader. None of that is flashy. But it’s effective.

The bloggers who win in 2026 won’t be the ones who publish the most content, install the most AI tools, or chase the newest acronym. They’ll be the ones who make their content easier to understand, easier to trust, and easier to remember.

That’s what moves the needle now.

Dig deeper: Blogging, AI, and the SEO road ahead: Why clarity now decides who survives

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


The outdated advice bloggers should ignore

Part of succeeding in 2026 is also knowing what to stop doing.

That may be harder than it sounds because a lot of outdated SEO advice did work at some point. Or at least, it appeared to work well enough that bloggers kept repeating it.

The problem is that many of those tactics were built for an older version of search. They were built for a world where ranking often felt like a checklist: find the keyword, put it in the title, repeat it in the headings, write more words than the competitor, add a few FAQs, hit publish, and hope Google approved.

That kind of thinking isn’t completely useless, but it’s painfully incomplete. And in an AI-shaped search environment, incomplete strategies become expensive.

The first thing bloggers need to stop doing is chasing word count.

A 3,000-word recipe article isn’t automatically better than a 900-word recipe article. A 5,000-word travel guide isn’t automatically more helpful than a tighter, better-organized 2,000-word guide. Length isn’t the goal. Usefulness is the goal.

Sometimes a topic needs depth. Sometimes a reader needs context, troubleshooting, photos, variations, and a complete explanation. But sometimes the reader just needs to know whether they can use Greek yogurt instead of sour cream or how long to bake chicken thighs at 400 degrees.

Adding more words doesn’t make a page more helpful if those words don’t solve the user’s problem.

The same goes for stuffing awkward keyword variations into H2s. Bloggers don’t need headings like “Best Easy Moist Homemade Banana Bread Recipe With Ripe Bananas” because a tool suggested combining every phrase into one linguistic crime scene.

Headings should guide the reader. They should make the page easier to scan, easier to understand, and easier to navigate. If a heading sounds like it was written for a spreadsheet instead of a human being, it probably needs to be rewritten.

Bloggers also need to be more skeptical of publishing generic content just because a keyword tool says there is search volume. This is especially important in crowded niches like recipes, travel, and lifestyle, where the web already has more than enough generic versions of almost everything.

Another “chocolate chip cookie recipe” isn’t a strategy unless there is a reason your version deserves to exist.

Another “best things to do in Paris” article isn’t a strategy unless it reflects real experience, clear audience fit, original insight, or a better way of helping the reader make decisions.

Another “how to organize your pantry” article isn’t a strategy if it says the same thing every other article says with different stock photos.

Search volume tells you there is demand. It doesn’t tell you that you deserve to rank. That part is still on you.

Food bloggers especially need to reconsider the way they structure recipe articles visually. Somewhere along the way, many articles turned into an obstacle course of nearly identical finished-dish photos before the reader gets to the actual recipe.

One hero shot is great. A useful process shot is great. A labeled ingredients photo, awesome. Photos that show texture, doneness, technique, or troubleshooting can all absolutely improve the content.

But five beauty shots of the same casserole from slightly different angles before the recipe card aren’t helping a tired person make dinner.

This doesn’t mean bloggers should strip personality, visuals, or storytelling from their sites. On the contrary, it means every element on the page should earn its place.

A photo should help, inspire, or clarify. A paragraph should answer a question, build trust, or move the reader forward. A section should exist because it improves the experience, not because everyone else’s template includes it.

Bloggers also need to stop hiding the answer.

This is one of the simplest and most common problems I see in daily audits. The user arrives with a specific need, and the page makes them work too hard to satisfy that need.

The answer is buried under a long intro, vague personal story, oversized ad units, popups, duplicate photos, or a “jump to recipe” button doing the emotional labor for the entire page.

If the page is about whether you can freeze banana pudding, say so clearly.

If the page is about the best time to visit Sedona, answer it clearly.

If the page is about how to keep meatballs from falling apart, don’t make the reader scroll through 11 paragraphs before you explain the binder.

This isn’t just an SEO issue. It’s a respect-the-reader issue.

FAQs are another place where bloggers have been led astray. A helpful FAQ can be great when it answers real questions users actually have. FAQs also allow the average blogger to optimize for People Also Ask and Things to Know search accordions.

But too many FAQ sections are still being treated as a dumping ground for keyword variations, thin answers, or filler content added because a tool, course, or template said every article needs them.

Every FAQ should pass a basic test: Would a real reader ask this, and does the answer help them do something? If not, cut it.

Updating dates without meaningful updates is another tactic that needs to die.

Changing “2024” to “2026” in the title, or adjusting the publish date and calling it refreshed, doesn’t make the content better. It just makes it newer-looking.

A real update improves accuracy, usefulness, structure, media, internal links, testing notes, examples, recommendations, or user experience.

A fake update changes the timestamp and hopes nobody notices. Readers notice. Google notices.

Bloggers also need to stop writing for SEO scores instead of users.

I understand why this happens. Tools give clear feedback. Green lights feel good. Scores feel objective. It’s comforting to believe that if a tool says the page is optimized, the page must be good.

But tools aren’t users.

Tools don’t make dinner. Tools don’t plan vacations. Tools don’t troubleshoot a broken frosting, choose a hotel near a train station, or decide whether a slow cooker recipe is safe to leave on all day.

Tools can support judgment. They can’t replace it. The same goes for panic-based SEO.

Every Google announcement doesn’t require a sitewide overhaul. Every AI update doesn’t require installing a new plugin. Every ranking drop doesn’t mean your site is broken. Every Facebook thread isn’t an emergency.

One of the worst things bloggers can do right now is make extreme technical or content changes based on fear, screenshots, rumors, or one person’s traffic chart.

The answer to uncertainty isn’t panic. It’s better analysis.

It’s Search Console. It’s content audits. It’s user behavior. It’s competitive review. It’s better internal linking. It’s clearer content. It’s understanding what actually changed before deciding what to change next.

The blunt version is this: Stop producing content that looks like it was made to satisfy a plugin, a keyword tool, or an ad network.

Start producing content that makes a tired person at 5:30 p.m. say, “Thank God, this actually helps.” That’s the standard. 

Not word count. Not tool scores. Not awkward keyword repetition. Not fake freshness. Not more filler.

The standard is whether the content helps a real person solve a real problem faster, better, or with more confidence than the alternatives.

That’s the advice bloggers should carry into 2026. Ignore anything that pulls you further away from that.

Dig deeper: The implosion of the blogging-for-dollars revenue model

Why clarity beats complexity in an AI world

When search gets more complicated, the natural reaction is to make the strategy more complicated as well.

That’s how bloggers end up chasing every new newsletter strategy, every new tool, every new AI feature, every new schema recommendation, and every new “future of SEO” thread that shows up in a Facebook group.

I understand the impulse. When traffic is volatile and Google keeps changing the interface, doing something feels better than doing nothing. The problem is that a lot of the “something” being recommended right now is either unnecessary, unproven, or a distraction from the work that would actually help.

If a blogger asked me what to focus on in 2026, my answer wouldn’t be to make their site more complicated. It would be to make their site easier to understand. That’s the through-line.

AI search doesn’t reward confusion. Users don’t reward confusion. Google doesn’t need more clutter to crawl, interpret, and summarize.

What everyone needs is clarity. That starts with the page itself.

When someone lands on a recipe article, they should quickly understand what the recipe is, why it works, what makes it different, how long it takes, what ingredients matter, and whether it solves the problem they came with.

When someone lands on a travel article, they should quickly understand who the advice is for, when the information applies, whether the writer has firsthand experience, and what decisions the reader needs to make next.

When someone lands on a lifestyle article, they should quickly understand the problem, the recommendation, the steps involved, and why the advice is trustworthy.

That doesn’t mean every article has to be short. It means every article has to be organized.

There’s a big difference between depth and bloat.

  • Depth helps the reader make a better decision. Bloat makes them scroll.
  • Depth answers follow-up questions. Bloat repeats the same point three different ways.
  • Depth shows experience, testing, judgment, and specificity. Bloat fills space because a tool, template, or competitor word count made the blogger nervous.

In an AI world, that difference matters even more.

Large language models, AI Overviews, and AI-assisted search experiences are trying to understand relationships. They’re looking for entities, context, steps, attributes, comparisons, caveats, and source quality signals.

If your content is buried under vague headings, generic filler, weak internal links, and unclear structure, you’re making that job harder.

And making Google work harder is rarely a winning SEO strategy.

This is why “clarity beats complexity” isn’t just a nice phrase. It’s a practical publishing standard.

  • Before adding another section, ask whether it makes the page easier to use.
  • Before adding another FAQ, ask whether a real reader would ask that question.
  • Before adding another image, ask whether it clarifies a step, shows texture, demonstrates technique, or builds confidence.
  • Before adding another internal link, ask whether it helps the reader move naturally to a related answer.
  • Before adding another AI tool, ask whether it improves the user experience or just makes the blogger feel like they’re keeping up.

That last one is important. AI tools aren’t automatically bad. AI summaries, AI buttons, chat features, personalization tools, and recipe modification features can all be worth testing in the right context.

But they should be treated like UX experiments, not magic ranking levers.

If an AI button helps a reader scale a recipe, find a substitution, adjust serving sizes, or understand a process faster, great. Test it. Measure it. See how users respond.

But don’t install something because everyone else is panicking. Don’t assume “AI” in the feature name means it improves SEO. And definitely don’t let the tool become more important than the content.

For most bloggers, the highest-impact AI strategy is still not very sexy: make the page easier to read, easier to crawl, easier to summarize, and easier to trust.

That means clear introductions, useful summaries, descriptive headings, original experience, accurate schema, strong internal links, and visible text that actually says something.

It also means removing the things that get in the way.

  • Over-aggressive ads get in the way.
  • Intrusive popups get in the way.
  • Repetitive photos get in the way.
  • Generic “why you’ll love this” sections get in the way when they’re not personalized to the article.
  • Filler FAQs get in the way.
  • Weak author signals get in the way.
  • Internal links with anchor text like “click here” get in the way.
  • Redundant equipment lists added purely for affiliate reasons get in the way.

A blogger doesn’t need a 47-point AI optimization checklist to understand this.

They need to look at the page and ask a simpler question: “Is this easier to understand than what already ranks?”

Does your page help the reader faster, better, and with more confidence than the alternatives?

That’s what clarity does. It removes friction, makes expertise easier to see, helps Google and AI systems understand your content, builds trust, and makes your brand more memorable.

For food, lifestyle, and travel bloggers, clarity works across traditional organic search, AI Overviews, AI Mode, direct traffic, email, social, and conversion.

That’s why I keep coming back to the same point: clarity isn’t dumbing down your content. It’s respecting the reader’s time.

The bloggers who win in 2026 won’t be the ones who make their content more complicated to look sophisticated. They’ll be the ones who make complicated decisions feel easier for the reader.

  • What should I cook tonight?
  • Can I make this ahead?
  • Is this destination worth three days?
  • Will this work for my family?
  • Can I trust this recommendation?
  • What do I do next?

Answer those questions clearly, and you’re already doing more than most of the web.

That’s why clarity beats complexity. And that’s why clarity is no longer just a writing principle. It’s an SEO strategy.

Your 2026 blogging SEO action plan

The good news is that bloggers don’t need to rebuild their entire sites overnight.

They don’t need to chase every AI feature, rewrite every article, install every new tool, or turn their content strategy into a science experiment.

In most cases, the best next step is much simpler: 

  • Identify the pages that matter most.
  • Make them clearer.
  • Strengthen the signals around them.
  • Stop doing the things that create friction for users.

Start with your highest-value content

These are the articles that already have traffic history, strong impressions, seasonal value, affiliate or ad revenue potential, or rankings that are close enough to improve.

Don’t begin with the random article that annoys you personally or the recipe you happen to have new photos for. Start where the opportunity is visible.

Use Search Console. Look at what Google is already showing. Find the articles where better clarity, stronger internal links, improved structure, fresher details, or more useful supporting content could reasonably move the needle.

Then work through the page like a real user.

Add a clear top-of-article summary

For most bloggers, the first improvement I’d recommend is a clear top-of-article summary. This doesn’t need to be long, and it definitely shouldn’t be a generic AI-written blob pasted across the site. It should be specific to the article and useful for the reader.

  • For a recipe, that summary might explain what the dish is, why it works, how long it takes, what makes it different, which ingredients matter most, and any major make-ahead, storage, or substitution notes.
  • For a travel article, it might clarify who the guide is for, when the information applies, how much time the reader needs, and what decisions they should make first.
  • For a lifestyle article, it might define the problem, preview the solution, and make the next step obvious.

The goal isn’t to repeat the whole article at the top. It’s to reassure the reader that they’re in the right place while giving Google and AI systems a clearer understanding of the page.

Again, this isn’t magic. It’s just good communication.

Strengthen internal links

Improve internal linking with descriptive anchor text.

This is still one of the most underused SEO opportunities in blogging, especially on older sites with hundreds or thousands of articles. Too many bloggers rely on related article widgets, sidebar links, or generic anchor text and assume that’s enough.

In-content links are stronger when they’re natural, useful, and descriptive.

A reader making a slow cooker chicken dinner may also need a related side dish, a sauce, a storage guide, or another easy weeknight meal. A reader planning a weekend in Charleston may need a hotel guide, a restaurant list, a packing guide, or a nearby day trip. A reader working through a furniture troubleshooting article may need links to paint, sanding, and woodworking guides and tutorials.

The anchor text should tell the reader where they’re going.

“Click here” doesn’t help much. “Easy slow cooker chicken dinners for busy weeknights” does.

“Read more” doesn’t help much. “Beginner furniture restoration guide” does.

Clear internal links make topical relationships easier for users, Google, and AI systems to understand. They also keep readers moving through the site instead of sending them back to Google.

Make headings useful

Headings shouldn’t be keyword dumpsters. They should be signposts that help readers and search systems understand the structure of the page.

For recipes, that usually means headings like “Why this recipe works,” “Key ingredients,” “How to make X recipe,” “Recipe testing notes,” “Substitutions and variations,” “Storage and reheating,” “What to serve with X recipe,” and “X recipe FAQs.”

For travel content, it might mean “Best time to visit,” “How many days you need,” “Where to stay in X,” “How to get around X,” “What to book in advance,” “Mistakes to avoid,” and “Sample itinerary in X.”

For lifestyle content, it might mean “What you’ll need,” “How to get started with X,” “Common mistakes with X,” “What worked for me,” “When to avoid this,” and “Next steps.”

The clearer the structure, the easier the page is to use and interpret.

Review your schema

Bloggers should also review schema, but they should do so with restraint.

Structured data isn’t a place to invent things, exaggerate claims, or mark up content that users can’t see. It should accurately reflect what’s visible on the page.

If the recipe says the total time is 45 minutes, the schema shouldn’t say 30 minutes because that looks better in search results. If the author, date, images, ratings, or recipe details are inaccurate, fix them.

Schema should clarify. It shouldn’t cosplay as content quality.

Reduce content friction

Focus on reducing content friction. Ads, popups, sticky units, email captures, video players, and interstitials may all have business value, but they also create user experience costs.

If a user can’t read the recipe because the screen is covered in interruptions, or a travel guide is buried under popups and sticky elements before the reader can find the itinerary, that’s a problem.

This doesn’t mean bloggers should remove every ad or stop monetizing their work. But the page still has to be usable.

If monetization makes the content harder to trust, read, or act on, the short-term revenue win may be creating a long-term visibility problem.

Test AI features carefully

AI features, such as AI buttons, can be useful in the right context. A button that helps users scale a recipe, find substitutions, modify ingredients, summarize key steps, or troubleshoot a process may improve the user experience.

But bloggers should measure before assuming.

  • Do users click the buttons?
  • Do they stay longer?
  • Do they convert better?
  • Do they subscribe?
  • Do they view more pages?
  • Do they actually use the feature, or does it just make the site look more “AI-ready”?

AI tools should support the reader. They shouldn’t distract from the content, replace firsthand experience, or become the strategy by themselves.

Dig deeper: How to design content that AI systems prefer and promote

If AI can’t find you, customers won’t either.

Track your visibility across AI search, uncover missed opportunities, and grow your presence where customers are asking questions.

See your AI visibility

Clarity is what wins in 2026

Improve the articles that already have opportunity, add clearer summaries, strengthen internal links, clean up headings, verify schema, reduce friction, build direct audience channels, and test AI features only when they clearly help users.

That’s not flashy. But most durable SEO isn’t flashy. It’s a consistent, thoughtful improvement applied to the pages that matter most.

For the average blogger, that’s the plan I’d recommend. Do fewer random things. Do more useful things. Make the best content easier to understand, easier to trust, and easier to revisit.

That’s how you build a site that can compete in traditional search, AI search, and whatever version of AI Mode Google throws at us next.

Read more at Read More

Why your match rate is the most important number you’re not tracking by Rokt mParticle

Ask a performance marketer which numbers they check every morning and you’ll get the same list: CPM, CTR, CVR, ROAS. Ask them their match rate on Meta or Google, the share of an audience they uploaded that the platform could actually recognize and target, and you’ll usually get a pause. Most teams don’t track it. Plenty don’t know it’s a number at all.

That pause is expensive. Build an audience of 100,000 customers, upload it to a platform that matches 55% of them, and the campaign is running against 55,000 people. The other 45,000 are invisible to it, no matter how good the targeting or the creative is. And match rate sits upstream of every metric that teams do track. 

When a platform recognizes only part of the audience you built, every number that follows (reach, frequency, conversions, return on spend) is quietly computed against that smaller matched audience. You can rework creative, retune bids, and rebuild your conversion model forever, and none of it touches the slice of your audience the platform never saw. The part worth examining is where matching breaks, why it’s getting harder, and how much reach teams lose without ever seeing it on a dashboard.

The gap between the audience you build and the audience you reach

Here’s the mechanic most teams never examine. When you push a first-party audience to a paid platform, the platform doesn’t target “your customers.” It targets the subset of your list it can resolve to its own logged-in users, usually by matching hashed emails and phone numbers against the identifiers on its accounts. Every record it can’t resolve simply falls out, with no error and no warning. The campaign runs against whoever survived.

Every privacy shift of the past few years has widened that gap. Third-party cookie deprecation removed the connective tissue that bridged identities across sites. Apple’s App Tracking Transparency cut off device identifiers. The walled gardens keep tightening their matching logic. And the mundane failure modes never went away: the customer who signs up with a work email but uses a personal one on social, the phone number formatted differently on each side, the record that’s three years stale. Identifiers are splintering faster than most CRMs and CDPs can consolidate them, so the distance between the audience you build and the audience you can reach is growing, not shrinking, no matter how clean your data is.

The insidious part: platforms report performance against the matched portion. So the campaign looks fine. You’re measuring the efficiency of the audience the platform found, not the audience you built, and the difference between the two never shows up in any report you open.

Four places it’s costing you right now

Most marketers who have thought about match rate file it under “retargeting problem.” It’s far broader than that.

  • Acquisition. Seed and exclusion lists that only partially match make prospecting less precise, and a platform training on partial signal has to guess more. That usually surfaces as inflated CAC, and never gets traced back to matching.
  • Retargeting. The obvious one, but state the math plainly: if your CRM list matches at 45%, more than half the customers you meant to re-engage never see the campaign. The program runs at less than half capacity, and its reported numbers say nothing about the people it never reached.
  • Suppression. The sneakiest. Suppression lists only suppress the customers a platform recognizes. Every existing customer who doesn’t match is invisible to your exclusions, so you pay acquisition prices to re-buy people you already have, and some of them get served the new-customer discount your loyal buyers never see. Low match rates don’t just waste budget; they fund your own margin erosion.
  • Lookalike seeding. Lookalike models expand from the matched portion of your seed, not the seed you uploaded. A weak match rate means the model learns from a skewed sub-sample of your best customers, and that error compounds as the platform extrapolates across millions of impressions.

Add it up, and match rate isn’t a data team curiosity. It’s a tax on every dollar of paid spend, and almost nobody has measured how big it is.

What happens when you close the gap

This isn’t just theoretical. CKE Restaurants, the company behind Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s, ran their audiences through Rokt mParticle’s Match Boost to enrich identifiers for ad platforms. Match rates rose up to 117% on Google Ads and 29% on Meta.

Note what didn’t change: the budget, the creative, the campaign structure. The same spend simply reached more of the audience the brands had already built, and ROAS improved on that same spend. That’s the signature of a match-rate problem. When recognition goes up, efficiency follows, because the waste you’re removing was never visible to begin with.

This used to be a procurement project. Now it’s a setting.

If match rate has been ignored, part of the reason is that fixing it used to be genuinely painful. Improving recognition meant licensing third-party data: vendor evaluations, procurement cycles, legal review, an integration build, and months before you could measure anything. The cost of the fix outweighed an upside most teams weren’t even quantifying.

That’s no longer the shape of the problem. Enrichment increasingly happens at the point where audiences leave your customer-data infrastructure for the ad platform, a setting on the connection rather than a system you build. 

Done well, it inherits the governance you already have: identifiers you’ve deliberately excluded for privacy or compliance stay excluded, and the enriched data is used only to sharpen the match in flight, never written back into your profiles or stored in the destination platform. Closing the gap has become a configuration decision, not a data-strategy overhaul. That doesn’t mean it’s solved for everyone. It means the excuse for not looking is gone.

How to check your own match rate

Measure the gap. It takes about thirty minutes.

  • Pick your top three paid destinations by spend.
  • For each, compare the size of the list you uploaded against what the platform actually matched. Google Ads reports a match rate on Customer Match uploads (bucketed, but close enough); Meta shows the resulting audience size, which you can hold against the list you sent. Most brands land somewhere in the 40–60% range for email-only lists, well below what most teams assume.
  • Run the same check on your largest suppression list. That’s the one that will sting.

If your numbers come back north of 70%, go back to optimizing creative. If you’re like most brands, you’ll find you’ve been paying full price to reach a fraction of your audience. Every metric you already track is downstream of that one number, and most teams have never looked at it.

Read more at Read More

New in the Yoast SEO Bulk Editor: filters, focus keyphrases, and AI drafts

The Yoast SEO Bulk Editor already gave you one place to update titles and meta descriptions across your whole site. Now it does much more. This release adds focus keyphrases to the editor, new search and status filters, a dedicated view for every content type, and AI-drafted metadata with Yoast SEO Premium. In short: you can find what’s broken, fix it in bulk, and let AI handle the heavy lifting while you keep final say.

Running an online store? Jump to what this means for your shop.

A focused workspace

The Bulk Editor now shows only the fields that matter: your titles, meta descriptions, and, new in this version, your focus keyphrases. Everything is searchable, filterable, and organized per content type. As a result, posts, pages, products, and custom post types each get their own editor, which is ideal for publishers and stores alike.

Whether you manage 50 pages or 5,000, you can still move through them quickly and systematically. Just inherited a site? The Bulk Editor remains the fastest way to get it to a solid SEO baseline without starting from scratch.

New: search and status filters

You can’t fix what you can’t see all at once. The new filters get you straight to the pages that need work. For example, you can pull up every page missing a description, every draft, or every post targeting a keyphrase in seconds instead of scrolling. From there, you review, update, and move on without opening a single page.

Easily search for the page, product or post you are looking to edit

New: AI drafts it, you approve it (selected plans*)

Even when you can see what’s missing, writing hundreds of titles and descriptions by hand is a project nobody has time for. With paid plans like Yoast SEO Premium, you can now select the content that needs work and let AI draft the metadata for you. You then review each suggestion, apply what you like, and tweak or discard the rest.

Crucially, nothing saves without your permission. Per-row and batch apply or discard controls, plus unsaved-changes warnings, give you bulk editing without bulk mistakes. That means you can work through hundreds of pages with confidence, not caution.

Working with the AI powered metadata generator

*AI drafting is available with Yoast SEO Premium. WooCommerce and Yoast SEO AI+ plans extend it to products and categories.

New for stores: catalog metadata at scale

Keeping product metadata complete and unique across a large catalog is one of the most tedious jobs in e-commerce. This release helps in two ways. First, products get their own view in the Bulk Editor, so you can filter your catalog and spot the gaps fast. Second, Yoast WooCommerce SEO and Yoast SEO AI+ plans extend AI drafting to products and categories. Your store can therefore generate, review, and approve catalog metadata at scale, right in time for the next seasonal peak.

The post New in the Yoast SEO Bulk Editor: filters, focus keyphrases, and AI drafts appeared first on Yoast.

Read more at Read More

Google confirms Local Inventory Ads will be enabled by default

After notifying advertisers about the upcoming change last week, Google has now officially confirmed on the Google Ads Developer Blog that Local Inventory Ads (LIA) will be enabled by default for all Shopping campaigns beginning August 31st.

Why we care. Advertisers using Shopping campaigns will no longer be able to disable Local Inventory Ads through the Google Ads API. If your workflows or campaign structure rely on keeping local inventory separate from online inventory, you’ll need to update both your code and campaign configuration before the change takes effect.

What’s changing. Starting Aug. 31, Google will automatically enable the “Local products” setting for every Shopping campaign.

Previously, advertisers had to explicitly set the enable_local field to true in a campaign’s ShoppingSetting to serve products from their Local Inventory Ads feed.

After the update:

  • Shopping campaigns will always have Local Inventory Ads enabled.
  • The Campaign.ShoppingSetting.enable_local field will be ignored.
  • Google will automatically treat the setting as true, regardless of the value submitted.

The change aligns Shopping campaigns with Performance Max for Retail, where Local Inventory Ads are already enabled by default.

What developers need to do. Developers using Google Ads API v25.1 or later should stop attempting to set enable_local to false.

Doing so will return:

  • ContextError.OPERATION_NOT_PERMITTED_FOR_CONTEXT

For API versions earlier than v25.1, existing code will continue to work, but any attempts to disable Local Inventory Ads will simply be ignored, with Google treating the value as true.

How to prevent local products from serving. Advertisers that previously disabled Local Inventory Ads for specific Shopping campaigns now have two alternatives:

  • Create a listing scope using CampaignCriterionService with product_channel set to ONLINE.
  • Use the Inventory filter in the Google Ads campaign settings to exclude local inventory and separate budgets between online and local products.

In other words, Google is shifting inventory control away from a simple campaign setting and toward inventory filtering.

Not changing. The update applies only to Shopping campaigns.

The enable_local field will continue to function normally for other supported campaign types, including:

  • Performance Max
  • Demand Gen

Bottom line. Beginning Aug. 31, Local Inventory Ads will automatically be enabled for every Shopping campaign. Advertisers that currently rely on disabling local inventory should update their API integrations and inventory filtering strategy before the rollout.

Read more at Read More

Google drops $50K ad spend requirement for Lead Form assets

Google has quietly updated its documentation for Lead Form assets, removing one of the biggest barriers that prevented smaller advertisers from using the format.

Why we care. The long-standing requirement for advertisers to spend more than $50,000 in Google Ads before becoming eligible for certain Lead Form experiences has disappeared from the Help documentation. If this reflects a product change—and not just a documentation update—it could make Google-hosted lead generation available to significantly more advertisers.

What’s changed. The $50,000 spend threshold is gone.

Previously, advertisers needed to meet one of two requirements to use Lead Forms in certain formats:

  • Spend more than $50,000 USD in Google Ads.
  • Or qualify as a reputable advertiser spending more than $1,000 per account (or $15,000 across accounts) and complete Advertiser Verification.

The updated documentation removes the $50,000 lifetime spend requirement entirely. The only eligibility path now mentioned is the advertiser reputation and verification requirement.

That is the most significant change in the update and substantially lowers the documented barrier to entry.

Campaign support has changed. Google has also simplified where Lead Form assets can be used.

Previously:

  • Search
  • Performance Max
  • Display
  • Video (beta)

Now:

  • Search
  • Performance Max

References to Video campaigns have been removed from the overview, while Display is no longer listed as a supported campaign type. Interestingly, the requirements section still references Display campaigns, suggesting the documentation may not yet be fully aligned across all Help pages.

More lead delivery options. Google expanded the documented methods for receiving leads.

Newly documented options include:

  • Email notifications
  • Zapier integration

These join existing delivery methods:

  • CSV download
  • Webhooks
  • Google Ads API

The addition of Zapier gives advertisers a no-code way to automatically send leads into thousands of CRM platforms and business applications.

Better clarification on lead retention. Google also clarified how long lead data is stored.

The updated documentation now explicitly states:

  • Manual CSV downloads are available for 30 days.
  • Google stores lead data for 60 days.
  • API exports can access up to 60 days of lead data.

Previously, the 60-day retention period wasn’t clearly explained alongside manual downloads.

New positioning. Google also refreshed how it describes Lead Form assets.

The previous documentation focused on generating leads and increasing conversions.

The updated version emphasizes:

  • Higher-quality leads
  • Higher lead volume
  • Easier implementation
  • OTP verification for improving lead quality

Expanded country availability. Google added more than two dozen additional countries where Lead Form assets are eligible, including Bahrain, Croatia, Estonia, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Serbia, Slovenia and Tunisia.

Bottom line. Google’s latest Lead Form documentation refresh includes several usability improvements, expanded integrations and broader geographic availability. But the standout update is the disappearance of the $50,000 Google Ads spend requirement—potentially opening one of Google’s most valuable lead-generation formats to far more advertisers.

Read more at Read More