Posts

Web Design and Development San Diego

How AI may increase the value of SEO expertise

How AI may increase the value of SEO expertise

By now, you’ve heard the doom and gloom.

SEO is a white-collar job. So does that mean our jobs will be eliminated, too? The answer isn’t as obvious as you might think.

Yes, the world is changing. But if you’ve been doing SEO for a while, you should be used to that by now.

SEOs have always been forced to wear strange combinations of hats: part technical analyst, part content strategist, part UX researcher, part marketer, and part analyst.

I don’t think AI will make SEO expertise obsolete. But it will make shallow SEO obsolete.

The people who thrive will be the ones who understand search behavior, business outcomes, technical systems, content strategy, analytics, and how to turn all of that into better decisions.

The old version of SEO stopped working years ago

I’ve been doing SEO since before there was a word for “SEO.” Every few years, there’s a viral article declaring that “SEO is dead.” One of the first to catch fire was a 2005 article by Jeremy Schoemaker, repeating something he’d heard from Jason Calacanis. 

Then, in 2009, Danny Sullivan wrote an article on this site reacting to a blog post by Robert Scoble declaring that “SEO isn’t important anymore.”

We know the reality. SEO never died. But over the years, it’s changed a lot.

Look at this screenshot of a Google search for [flowers] in 2007 versus the same search in 2026.

Google Search in 2007 for flowers
Google’s “flowers” SERP in 2007, when a No. 1 organic ranking controlled most of the visible page.
Google Search in 2026 for flowers
Google’s “flowers” SERP in 2026, where organic listings compete with ads, shopping results, local packs, AI features, and other search elements.

This example is near and dear to my heart because I wrote that title tag in 2007. I was fortunate enough to lead SEO at 1-800-Flowers at a time when a No. 1 organic ranking meant significant traffic and revenue.

Twenty years later, their team has maintained the No. 1 organic ranking. However, today it’s so buried on the SERP that I wonder whether it gets any clicks at all.

This phenomenon isn’t limited to searches for “flowers.” Search for any competitive head term these days, and chances are you’ll see the organic result buried.

Is SEO “dead”? That really depends on your definition of “SEO.”

If your definition is “getting to the top of Google organic search” by spending your whole day writing title tags, then yeah, SEO is pretty much dead. It has been for a long time.

If your definition of SEO is understanding that people are looking for your goods and services, understanding their needs, answering their questions, and meeting them wherever they go to find information, then your journey as an SEO expert — or whatever you eventually decide to call yourself — is only beginning.

Dig deeper: Could AI eventually make SEO obsolete?

Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.

The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

Why true SEO experts are uniquely positioned to thrive 

There’s one phenomenon I’ve noticed with AI, not just in SEO, but across every industry. You might have noticed it too.

On social media, you’ll see a lot of AI-generated videos. The vast majority are silly “look what I can do with AI” videos. You see them, maybe press “Like,” and then forget about them. But the ones with staying power are made by people who understand filmmaking: pacing, framing, lighting, composition, camera movement, editing, sound design, and how to build toward an emotional payoff.

In other words, even though everyone can generate videos with AI now, the differentiator is no longer how “cool” the visuals are. It’s how skillfully creators use AI as a tool to achieve their vision.

There’s an analogous situation happening with SEO and AI. I’ve noticed a lot of people typing simplistic prompts and, like Neo in “The Matrix,” declaring, “I know SEO.”

What these folks don’t realize is that SEO is a lot more than title tags, and it was never just about reverse-engineering search engines. It was always about reverse-engineering the human brain, drawing on knowledge and experience across keyword lists, user behavior, content strategy, technical systems, analytics, persuasion, UX, and business outcomes.

When others are typing simplistic prompts into their LLMs, SEO experts will be having deep conversations with their LLMs, teaching them, challenging them, and finding ways to get the best out of them. Those who excel in this new world won’t be the ones who have all the answers. They’ll be the ones who have the right questions.

While it’s still early, and I’m convinced we haven’t even scratched the surface of ways to use LLMs in SEO, here are just a few ways I’ve been using AI in my SEO work to make it more efficient and effective than ever.

1. Performing SEO basics with unprecedented efficiency and effectiveness

I’m generally not a fan of AI-generated long-form writing. You end up with generic, inauthentic slop that, in the words of Shakespeare, is “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” 

I predict that a year from now, most people will be able to spot the clear signs of AI-generated copy: not just obvious tells like excessive use of em dashes and repetitive phrasing (“That’s not X … it’s Y!”), but a lack of authentic personality and stories.

Metadata is one of the places where I don’t mind AI assistance because its job isn’t to invent original thought. It’s to compress the page’s value, intent, and positioning into the right format for the right surface.

The big mistake I see people making with AI-generated metadata is that their prompts are far too generic: “Write a title tag for this page.”

A seasoned SEO knows the goal isn’t to create a “pretty title tag.” It’s to create the most effective title tag possible for human, search engine, and AI discovery. It takes into account various search intents, brand positioning, competitor gaps, conversion drivers, and practical space limitations.

AI opens up new opportunities that weren’t practical before. Not many people know that ideally, your title tag, Open Graph tag, and Twitter card should be distinct from one another because they’ll be shown to different audiences on Google, Facebook, and X. And it took me a few tries to remind AI that title tag length isn’t based on character count, but on pixel width.

Those “in the know” will start using AI to generate everything: title tags, meta description tags, OG tags, Twitter cards, and the right structured data.

Someone without SEO experience will write generic prompts and wonder why their perfectly polished title tags aren’t doing anything for them a year from now.

Dig deeper: The AI writing tics that hurt engagement: A study

2. Turning SEO recommendations into dev-ready tickets

One “edge” I’ve had throughout my career is the ability to translate vague marketing goals into precise technical requirements developers can actually execute.

But as technology has become more complex, I found myself hitting my own limits. I understood the principles of coding, but had a hard time articulating exactly what I needed developers to do. Googling hardly ever helped because I’d just find high-level articles written by consultants, some of whom clearly didn’t understand it either.

A practical example is modern React or single-page app architecture, where a page may look complete to users while key SEO content is assembled after load from JavaScript rather than appearing as crawlable HTML.

In the past, I might’ve written a vague recommendation like “we need more crawlable content on this page,” forcing my poor developer to figure out what that means.

With AI, I can turn that into a real implementation ticket: grounding the LLM in the site’s tech stack, translating the SEO need into concepts like server-side rendering, hydration, DOM content, and crawlable links, and adding examples, test cases, edge cases, and acceptance criteria.

The point isn’t to become a React engineer. It’s to communicate SEO requirements in a way that developers can execute without forcing them to think too much about it. Trust me, your developer will thank you.

3. Mining GSC, GA4, and Semrush or Ahrefs data for actual user needs

Treating AI optimization as long-tail SEO done right has been one of the game-changers for me when it comes to my own productivity.

The holy grail of SEO has always been to read your users’ minds and create content that meets their needs. Anyone who’s spent a lot of time with SEO data knows that there are enormous amounts of insights locked within this data. The first problem is unlocking them. The second problem is getting them into a format that will get people to pay attention.

In the past, I would literally lock myself in a room with a giant spreadsheet open on my screen. I’d go through search terms one by one, categorizing and clustering them, and, if I was lucky, end up with a handful of insights days later.

I might start with a list of 30,000 keywords and get through maybe a few hundred before getting completely exhausted. And when I’d present my insights, along with my giant pivot table, to stakeholders, they’d nod their heads, and then everyone would forget about them.

LLMs are changing the game. You can simply upload data from GSC, GA4, and Semrush and Ahrefs, along with your own business and market insights, and then simply ask your LLM questions.

Here are just a few recent examples of analyses I’ve done for my clients. These would once have taken days or weeks. Now I can get to a strong first pass in minutes.

  • Analyze our GSC keyword data and organize the keywords into topical clusters. Which topics do we clearly have a “right to own” in Google’s eyes?
  • Review our top competitors and uncover keywords within this topical neighborhood that they rank for but we don’t. What kind of content do we need to “break in”?
  • Surface GSC queries that get lots of impressions but few clicks. What improvements can we make to our titles, snippets, or positioning to drive more clicks?
  • Examine organic landing pages that attract a lot of traffic but fail to convert. What is the search intent behind the keywords driving traffic to these pages, and how can we improve conversion?
  • Find keywords where we’re in “striking distance” of stronger rankings. What additional content do we need to create or adjust to push us to the top?
  • Analyze the queries people type into our on-site search. What are examples of searches they might perform on Google or prompts they might use in LLMs when looking for this information?

There are literally an endless number of questions you can ask. I didn’t present these as sample prompts because they’re thought starters. While you’ll probably get a decent answer, the real value from AI comes only when you:

  • Dig deep into specific concepts, pages, and keywords.
  • Validate the LLM’s responses.
  • Challenge it as necessary.
  • Recognize hallucinations or context drift.
  • Put your findings into immediate action.

Dig deeper: How to use AI to diagnose and improve search intent alignment

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


4. Prototyping page layouts, content modules, and more

Something else I’ve found LLMs can do really well is generate a solid wireframe of a page or page module that you can pass on to your web designer and developer. But this is another area where the quality of the output depends almost entirely on the quality of your prompt and the context you provide the LLM.

Most people will simply type “design me a web page,” perhaps with a few “wish list” items they’d like to see. AI may produce something that looks “complete” on the surface, perhaps a hero section, a list of benefits, some FAQs, and a call to action (CTA). But when executed, it’ll feel lifeless, generic, and disconnected from the actual business problem.

The better approach is to ground the LLM with as much background information as possible. This doesn’t need to include every SEO report, but rather the ones that provide the highest-quality signals, such as the ones we discussed above: topic clusters, competitor gaps, conversion data, and on-site search data. Add other useful information like sales objections, customer reviews, your brand’s unique value propositions, and a clear explanation of what the page needs to accomplish.

With proper context, AI can help lay out something that transcends a generic landing page. For example, it can propose a strong hero section with suggested wording, recommendations for CTAs, section order, comparison tables, proof blocks, FAQs based on real questions, trust elements, and paths for different stages of intent.

Remember that it works in reverse, too. Upload a screenshot of an existing page, either yours or your competitor’s, tell the LLM what your goals are for the page, and ask it to critique the page.

AI can also open up other SEO opportunities that have previously been roadblocks. 

  • Want to do A/B testing? Tell the LLM the hypothesis you want to test, and have it come up with variants for you. 
  • Want to prototype a simple interactive tool? Provide your requirements, provide the underlying data, and see what your LLM can do. 

In some cases, it can go beyond a static mockup and produce a working prototype that a developer can evaluate, harden, and turn into production code.

Your edge as an SEO is knowing what information to feed the model, what problems the page actually needs to solve, and which ideas are strategically useful versus just AI-generated decoration.

The one thing that I haven’t seen AI do very well yet is generate professional-quality design and production-quality code. But everything up to that point is at your fingertips now. 

5. Making analytics useful again

As I’m sure it was for many of you, July 1, 2024, was a dark day for me. That’s when Google shut down Universal Analytics and forced us all onto GA4.

Since it was called Urchin, I’d all but mastered UA. Then one day, all of my reports and dashboards were simply gone. And I had no interest in spending another decade on a learning curve just to recreate reports that they’d once given me by default.

But with the arrival of LLMs, you can simply ask the LLM to walk you through building whatever report you want.

The first report I had to re-create was the on-site search report, one that’s inexplicably missing from GA4. I wrote my own prompt to walk me through creating this, but for the purposes of this article, I had ChatGPT write the prompt:


Act as a senior GA4 analytics consultant.

I want to rebuild a useful onsite search report in GA4/Looker Studio. GA4 does not provide the same dedicated Site Search report that Universal Analytics had, but I can use the `view_search_results` event, the `search_term` parameter, and any custom parameters needed.

Create a practical, implementation-ready plan that covers:

1. How to confirm onsite search tracking is working.

2. Recommended event name and parameters, including which should be registered as custom dimensions.

3. How to track searches when the site does not use URL query parameters.

4. The most useful report sections, including:
- total searches
- unique searchers
- top search terms
- zero-result searches
- refined or repeated searches
- searches followed by exits
- searches followed by conversions
- searches by page, device, and user type

5. Step-by-step instructions for building the report in GA4 Explore and Looker Studio.

6. A QA checklist to make sure the data is accurate.
Keep the answer concise, practical, and usable by both a marketer and a developer.

The key to writing these prompts, or prompts that generate prompts, is including the phrase “step by step.” One of the nice things about AI is that it doesn’t judge.

Take as long as you need, ask it to break the setup down into steps as granular as you like, and feel free to ask “dumb” questions. It’ll oblige enthusiastically.

You can imagine what this opens up. One of the classic issues with SEO analytics is that all too often, they’re merely vanity metrics. 

Conversions, clicks, impressions, and rankings may look impressive at first, but eventually the dreaded “so what” question will arise. Who really cares if you see impressions and rankings growing like wildfire if your revenue isn’t increasing?

This is where you want to ask your AI to help you tie data to business performance. 

  • Which unbranded keywords are actually driving revenue? 
  • Which are leading to soft conversion goals like email signup, account creation, or pricing page visits? 
  • Which search queries bring in engaged visitors who come back later through brand search, direct traffic, or email?

Again, the sky’s the limit. You can build a report or dashboard to answer just about any question your stakeholders have, provided you’re collecting the right data, and if you’re not, AI can help you create tickets for your web developer to collect that data.

Dig deeper: SEO analytics: How to interpret SEO data & anomalies

See the complete picture of your search visibility.

Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

The work is changing. The need for expertise isn’t.

Like I said, this is only scratching the surface of how AI can help transform the work we do as SEOs.

But let’s get to the question everyone is really asking: Is your job safe?

I don’t have a crystal ball. But one thing is pretty clear to me. Not every SEO job will survive unchanged. Big companies will likely cut roles. Teams will likely get smaller. A lot of tactical work that used to require specialists may be done faster, cheaper, or “good enough” by someone using AI.

If your value is limited to tasks that AI can perform on command, there may be challenges ahead.

But if your value is understanding customers, interpreting search behavior, connecting data to business outcomes, translating strategy into execution, and helping companies become more findable, useful, and trusted, then AI isn’t the end of your career. It may be the best leverage you’ve ever had.

And there’s another reason I’m optimistic. The same AI disruption hitting SEO is hitting every other white-collar profession, too. If large companies do lay off significant numbers of talented people, many of those people aren’t just going to disappear from the economy.

Some will start businesses. Some will finally pursue ideas they’ve had in their heads for years. Some will use AI to build prototypes, launch products, test markets, and create companies in ways that would have required far more capital and staff just a few years ago.

That should give us hope.

Many of the great companies we know today started with little more than a few people, an idea, and the willingness to figure things out as they went. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, Bill Gates and Paul Allen, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Michael Dell, and many others did not begin with massive corporations behind them. They began with ideas, persistence, and the tools available to them at the time.

If they were able to accomplish what they did with their tools, imagine what a new generation of entrepreneurs will be able to do with AI.

Maybe you’ll be one of those entrepreneurs. Or maybe your role will be helping one of them turn their ideas into businesses people can actually discover, understand, trust, and choose.

Either way, the products, services, brands, and businesses built with AI will still need to be found. They will still need to explain why they matter. They will still need to earn attention, authority, and trust.

SEO is dead. Long live SEO.

Read more at Read More

Web Design and Development San Diego

AI search loves listicles: What 25,000 URLs reveal about citations by Evertune

Large language models (LLMs) excel at synthesizing enormous amounts of information into personalized responses to plain-language prompts. These responses draw on massive training datasets and are often enhanced with internet searches. The fastest way to influence what LLMs say about your brand is to influence the content they retrieve through those searches.

At Evertune Research, we use the Evertune AI marketing platform to track hundreds of brands across 250 categories across every major LLM. This gives us clear insight into which content AI models cite most often, especially when users ask for brand or product recommendations across industries.

For this analysis, we reviewed the 6,000 most-cited URLs per model across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity for March and April. We found that these models share a key behavior: they heavily cite listicles.

Half of LLMs’ most-cited URLs are listicles

Of the roughly 25,000 unique URLs we reviewed, half were listicles. Across nearly 400 million citations from all models, 63% pointed to listicles.

Listicles have many qualities that make them ideal for models’ consumption

  • They’re tightly focused on a single topic, like “best laptops for gamers,” which makes them highly relevant to user prompts. 
  • Their structured format also makes the content easy for models to parse and reproduce. 
  • For brand-related queries, listicles do much of the work for LLMs by comparing products head-to-head on features, price, materials, and more—a format ChatGPT now features prominently in its shopping widget.

Listicles were pervasive across every model we reviewed. They accounted for 40–65% of the most-cited URLs, with Copilot at the low end and Gemini at the high end.

The vast majority of listicles in our analysis featured ranked lists, such as “Top 5 CRM Tools.” Depending on the model, these made up 71% to 86% of listicles. Unranked lists, such as “7 Ways to Save on Groceries,” were a distant second. Institutional rankings (e.g., data-heavy lists like U.S. News & World Report’s Best Colleges rankings) accounted for just 1.4% to 4.7% of listicles.

Corporate, earned media, and affiliate domains were the top sources of listicles in our analysis. It’s worth noting, however, that individual pages may contain affiliate content even when the broader domain does not. 

  • For example, Forbes.com is an earned media domain, but it includes affiliate segments such as Forbes Advisor and Forbes Vetted. It ranked among the top three sources on every model for listicles in our URL dataset.

A word of warning before making listicles the foundation of a GEO strategy: Google has already signaled its intent to crack down on promotional listicles. Simply ranking your own brand No. 1 alongside competitors could also run afoul of a Federal Trade Commission rule that “prohibits a business from misrepresenting that a website or entity it controls provides independent reviews or opinions about a category of products or services that includes its own products or services,” among other prohibitions.

URLs that thrive on multiple models

We reviewed the 6,000 most-cited URLs across six LLMs, which in theory produced a pool of 36,000 URLs. In practice, the dataset contained about 25,000 unique URLs, since many appeared among the most-cited results across multiple models.

Among the models, the three Google Gemini-powered models — Gemini, AI Mode, and AI Overviews — showed the highest overlap. More than half of Google AI Mode’s most-cited URLs also appeared among Google AI Overviews’ most-cited URLs. Gemini likewise shared a large portion of its top-cited URLs with both Google AI Mode and Google AI Overview.

The remaining models also shared the most URLs with Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews, though the overlap was much smaller. Perplexity shared more than 20% of its URLs with both models, while ChatGPT shared more than 15% with each. 

Given the thousands of URLs models cite on any topic, that still represents meaningful overlap. Copilot, by contrast, shared just 4% to 6% of its URLs with any other model.

The URLs that models cite most deviate for many reasons, including model training, sites’ crawl permissions and other factors. Traditional SEO that moves content higher in search results, no matter if the search is by a bot or a person, also plays a role, especially for Google AI Mode and Google AI Overview.

Page components of heavily cited URLs

Our review of the roughly 25,000 URLs heavily cited by LLMs found that these pages typically ranged from 1,000 to 2,000 words, averaged 18 words per sentence, linked frequently, and used structured headings (H2s and H3s) throughout.

Copilot favored the most concise content, typically citing pages with 964 words and 24 paragraphs. Gemini skewed more verbose, typically citing pages with 1,977 words and 53 paragraphs.

Although there’s no cookie-cutter formula for success in AI visibility, we found that the most-cited pages typically included the following components:

GEO takeaways

Each LLM has its own preferences and quirks, and a strong GEO strategy accounts for them. But our analysis of more than 25,000 URLs suggests that some GEO best practices can improve brand visibility and sentiment across models.

  • All LLMs cite large volumes of highly structured, hyper-specific content, which listicles exemplify. Avoid spammy, self-promotional listicles that Google penalizes, but otherwise aim to create and appear in lists where relevant.
  • Traditional SEO supports GEO. Pages that perform well in human search results also tend to perform well in bot-driven searches. This is especially true for Gemini-based models.
  • Pay attention to the page structures most often cited by the model you want to target. Copilot tends to favor brevity, while Gemini responds better to more expansive content. In general, keep pages under 2,000 words, use frequent links, apply strong structure, and include images and lists when relevant.

Read more at Read More

Yoast x WTS Global: SEO is built in community

Yoast x WTS Global: SEO is built in community

Hosts & Guests

What we learn, share, and build together

As part of the WTS Global Week celebrations, join Yoast and Women in Tech SEO for a special online coffee chat celebrating two incredible community milestones: 7 years of WTS and 16 years of Yoast.

SEO has always been more than algorithms, rankings, and updates; it’s built through people sharing ideas, supporting one another, and learning together. In this relaxed and inspiring session, Carolyn Shelby, Samah Nasr, and Areej AbuAli will reflect on the power of community in shaping careers, building confidence, and helping the SEO industry grow into a more collaborative and inclusive space.

Have you ever wondered where SEO professionals really learn beyond courses and documentation? Or how people find mentors, supportive communities, and opportunities to grow in the industry? Maybe you’re just starting out and trying to figure out which resources are actually worth your time.

Together, we’ll talk about how community creates learning opportunities, opens doors for newcomers, and provides the support people need to grow in SEO. Expect practical tips, career insights, honest experiences, and advice for those looking to deepen their involvement in the industry and connect with others in the space.

The session will include a 30-minute community chat followed by a live Q&A with attendees, giving everyone the chance to join the conversation and share their perspectives.

☕ Bring your coffee or tea, questions, and stories; we’d love for you to be part of it.

Event details

  • Duration: 45 mins
  • Live Q&A
  • Free registration
  • Recording available after the session

First upcoming events

SEO for beginners webinar
27 May 2026

Learn the essentials to start SEO confidently and boost your site’s visibility.

HiveMCR 2026
May 21 – 22, 2026

Team Yoast is Speaking, Sponsoring, Yoast Booth at HiveMCR 2026! Click through…


The post Yoast x WTS Global: SEO is built in community appeared first on Yoast.

Read more at Read More

How to Create an AI Visibility Report with Writesonic

Key Takeaways

  • An AI visibility report tracks how often your brand is cited across AI-generated responses. Think of it as a companion to your SEO reporting, not a replacement for it.
  • Your tracked prompt set is the foundation of every number Writesonic shows you. If you don’t understand what those prompts cover, you’ll misread your data.
  • Portfolios organize your tracked URLs by content type. Get this set up early and keep it updated as new content goes live.
  • Citation data is inherently noisy. A single-period dip rarely means anything. A sustained two-to-three-month trend does.
  • The Action Center is where the quick wins live. Use it to find pages with citation visibility gaps and start closing them.

Here’s something that should keep marketers up at night: your buyers are researching purchases in ChatGPT and Perplexity, and most brands have no idea whether they’re showing up in those answers.

That gap is exactly what an AI visibility report is built to close. It tells you how often your brand gets cited in AI-generated responses, which pages are driving those citations, and where competitors are outperforming you in the moments that matter most.

Writesonic has one of the more practical toolsets for building this kind of reporting. But I want to make one thing clear: I’m not trying to do a review of the platform. This is a working guide for content teams that need to get this reporting off the ground and want to understand what the data actually means before they put it in front of a client or a leadership team.

Why AI Visibility Reporting Matters for Marketing Teams

Buyers don’t just Google things anymore. A growing portion of them open ChatGPT, type a question, and act on whatever comes back. Salesforce research found that 41 percent of consumers used AI tools as part of their research process in 2024. That number has only grown since.

If your brand isn’t being cited in those responses, you’re losing potential customers.

AI visibility reporting helps you understand not just if you appear, but which topics you’re being cited for, how that’s changing over time, and who’s beating you in the answers your buyers are reading.

Where this fits in your stack matters, too. AI visibility reporting isn’t a replacement for organic search analytics or conversion data, but an added signal. This tells you whether AI systems find your content credible enough to surface. Teams that treat it as a complement to their larger organic strategy get more out of it than those trying to use it standalone.

The two questions it should help you answer: Are we showing up where buyers are actually looking? And if not, what do we fix first?

Understanding Your Prompt Set Before You Report on Anything

Every number in Writesonic traces back to your tracked prompt set. These are the specific questions the platform monitors across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI tools to see whether your content gets cited in the response.

Get this wrong, and everything downstream looks worse than it is.

The platform assigns default topic labels to clusters of prompts. Those labels are usually broad. A marketing blog running this kind of reporting might see their prompt topics labeled “content marketing” and “digital marketing.” Both are accurate but they are closely related terms that cover a huge swathe of subtopics. Due to the lack of specificity, you may encounter issues building and reporting on AI visibility if you only rely on the pre-populated topic list.  

Image related to How to Create an AI Visibility Report with Writesonic

Here’s what works better: export the full prompt list, drop it into an AI tool, and ask it to summarize the underlying themes, intent types, and audience categories. That same marketing agency’s list of 100 prompts might actually break into much more specific themes, like Organic & search visibility, Paid media & SEM, and Email & conversion.  

Image related to How to Create an AI Visibility Report with Writesonic

The screenshot above is a portion of Claude’s output when I asked it to perform this exercise. As you can see, there’s a lot more information here to guide our content reporting (and creation). Not only do we have a clearer idea of the GEO content pillars we’re tracking against, but also the audience and intent for each category.   

This type of output influences how you read everything else. If you find that your prompt set skews heavily toward one audience, your citation numbers for content aimed at a different audience will look artificially low. You can’t treat this as losing ground.  You’re just being measured against prompts that page was never written for. 

The practical rule: only report on content that genuinely aligns with your tracked prompt themes. Flagging low citation share on a page that serves a completely different audience creates confusion in client reports. Know your prompt set first, then interpret your data.

To pull the list, navigate to the Prompts section and use the export option. Fifteen minutes of AI-assisted theme analysis is worth doing before you touch anything else.

Setting Up Portfolios to Track Your Content Over Time

Portfolios are folders. They allow you to organize the URLs you’re tracking by content type so you can report on categories rather than hunting down individual pages every time you pull a report.

The Portfolio section of Writesonic.

Source

Create them early and keep them simple. At minimum, you want separate portfolios for blog posts, core website pages, and comprehensive guides. If your client has distinct product lines or service areas, break those out too.

The part that really matters is the workflow. As soon as a new piece of content goes live, add the URL to its portfolio. Teams that skip this step spend far too much time during reporting cycles searching for pages that should have been tracked from day one. Make it part of the implementation process: publish, review, then add to portfolio. 

One thing worth knowing: portfolios aren’t limited to your own content. You can add competitor URLs and track their citation performance in the same view. That’s useful when you need to show a client exactly where a competitor is outpacing them on a specific topic, without having to cross-reference separate reports mid-meeting.

How to Report on a Single Piece of Content

The path is: Overview > Citations > Content Performance. Set your date range and filter by URL slug.

Image related to How to Create an AI Visibility Report with Writesonic

You’ll mainly want to look at Citation Count or Citing Answers, which are how many times that page was cited across all tracked prompts in the selected period. 

If you look at Citation Share, the number may appear small. That’s because this view measures a single page’s citation contribution across your entire prompt set, not just the prompts that are relevant to what the page covers. A tightly focused blog post will naturally have limited citation surface area relative to the full prompt universe you’re tracking.

Second, pay attention to the prompts the page is and more importantly, is not being cited for. You can see the full prompt set by clicking on the number in the ‘Answers citing your content’ tab. In this case, I clicked on the 100.  

You’ll then be taken to the All Prompts & Answers view, where you can see which prompts and platforms are surfacing your content and which ones are not.  

Image related to How to Create an AI Visibility Report with Writesonic

If a page is ranking well for some prompts but missing others that closely match its content, those gaps are actionable. Adding a structured FAQ section or a more direct answer to a specific question can sometimes close them — and that’s something Writesonic can help you generate. 

Third, be careful with month-over-month comparisons. A single dip is not a signal. LLM citation patterns shift constantly as models update and competitive content changes. Before treating a decrease as a problem, remove the comparison period and look at a three-to-four-month trend line instead. A trough followed by recovery is a very different story than a genuine sustained decline.

When you do see a real downward trend, don’t touch the content first. Cross-reference with your SEO data and generative engine optimization metrics. Often, the issue is external, like a model update, and editing the content won’t fix it.

Reporting Content Categories with Portfolios

Another useful feature inside Writesonic is the ability to report on content performance at the portfolio level, not just the page level. 

To access it, navigate to Overview > Page Tracker > Portfolios. If you’ve organized portfolios by content type, topic cluster, service area, or funnel stage, this view gives you a meaningful way to evaluate how a group of pages is collectively performing in AI-generated answers.

This matters because page-level reporting only tells you so much. When you’re managing a content program at scale, you need to be able to say, “our informational content about hotel amenities is being cited regularly” or “our location-based pages are getting picked up but not driving brand mentions.” Portfolios let you have that conversation at the category level, which is how most content strategies are built and how most stakeholders think about performance.

Two metrics worth understanding here are citation share and visibility contribution.

Visibilty contribution and citation share in Writesonic.

Citation share tells you what percentage of all AI answers cite at least one page from that portfolio. Think of it as reach for that content category. A 1.6% citation share, like the example above, means those pages appeared in roughly 660 out of 40,000 tracked answers. Reported at the portfolio level, this becomes a concrete benchmark you can share: how often AI tools are drawing from this type of content, and how that’s trending over time.

Visibility contribution is a layer deeper. It measures the percentage of your brand’s total AI visibility that comes from pages in that portfolio being cited alongside a brand mention. It tells you which content categories are driving brand recognition in AI answers, not just traffic or citations. A portfolio with strong visibility contribution means your content and your brand name are appearing together in AI responses, which is the outcome you’re optimizing for.

Together, these two metrics help you go beyond vanity reporting and start answering the questions clients and stakeholders actually care about: Is this content working? Are people seeing our brand name? Which content categories should we double down on, and which need attention?

If a portfolio has solid citation share but low visibility contribution, AI tools are referencing those pages frequently but not associating them with your brand. That’s a signal to look at how clearly your brand is represented within the content itself. If a portfolio is underperforming on both, that’s a prioritization conversation. And if a portfolio is driving strong numbers on both, that’s proof-of-concept worth scaling.

Understanding Volatility: What’s Signal and What’s Noise?

LLM citation data is noisy by nature. This isn’t a Writesonic-specific problem. It’s how these models work. AI citation drift, where sources shift in and out of responses as models retrain, re-rank sources, or adjust sampling, has been documented across platforms. Research from SISTRIX shows citation sources can change significantly week over week, even when the underlying content is untouched.

One data point tells you almost nothing. The question is always whether you’re looking at a trend or a snapshot.

Citations in Writesonic over a two-month span.

For example, look at the graph above. This shows the number of citations a page has over a two-month span. As you can see, there are several peaks and valleys, even within the span of a few days. However, if you were to draw a trend line, the result would be relatively flat and even increase a bit towards the end of the second month. 

That’s why it’s important to remember that a one-period decrease is not a call to action. A consistent downward pattern over two to three months is worth digging into. Before you touch any content, pull SEO performance and AI Overview impression data for the same window. If organic traffic is stable and AI Overview appearances are flat, the Writesonic dip is most likely a model or sampling artifact.

This is worth saying explicitly to leadership and clients. AI visibility reporting is newer and messier than traditional SEO reporting. Setting that expectation upfront builds credibility. Trying to explain unexpected volatility after the fact does the opposite.

What Writesonic Can’t Tell You

Transparency on limitations makes reporting more credible, not less.

As mentioned earlier, Writesonic tracks a defined prompt set, not every AI query relevant to your category. Your citation numbers reflect performance within that sample. That distinction matters when someone asks why results look lower than expected. The tracked set may simply not cover the full range of queries where your content performs well.

Other things to be aware of include:

Prompt volume isn’t search volume. AI platforms don’t publish query data the way Google does. Estimating how many times people search specific prompts in platforms like ChatGPT requires multiple data sources, a scoring methodology, and sampled user data. That means LLM prompt volume should always be taken with a grain of salt, no matter what AI visibility platform you’re using.

Citation change versus buyer behavior. A drop in citations might reflect a model update or a competitor adding a stronger page. It doesn’t necessarily mean fewer buyers are encountering your brand. Separating those two things requires additional data sources like conversion tracking, qualitative research, or broader competitive analysis.

Competitive visibility outside the tracked set. You can see how competitors are performing within your prompt set. You can’t see how they’re performing in AI queries you aren’t tracking at all.

For each gap, the fix is the same: layer in additional signals. Use organic performance, GEO and AEO analysis alongside broader competitive research to paint the full picture. Writesonic works best as one input among several, not as a standalone source of truth.

Using Quick Wins to Improve AI Visibility Now

The Action Center is where the most immediately actionable reporting lives. Navigate to Action Center > Boost Content Visibility > Refresh existing content for AI visibility to find existing pages where competitors are being cited more often than you for the same prompts.

Suggestions from Writesonic to refresh existing content for AI visibiilty.

These are your quick wins. The pages themselves usually aren’t the problem; they’re just missing specific structural elements that AI models tend to pull from. Common recommendations from the platform include FAQ sections, comparison tables, and explicit key takeaway sections. These signal to large language models (LLMs) that a page directly answers a specific question and improves your chances of being cited.

Writesonic will generate draft versions of those elements for you. Use them as a starting point, not a final output. Editorial judgment still applies. Not every recommendation fits every page. A conversion-focused product page probably shouldn’t get a sprawling FAQ section that complicates the user journey, even if the data suggests it would improve citation share.

Generated AI content in Writesonic.

This module is particularly useful at campaign kick-off. Teams can surface concrete page improvements in the first few weeks while the broader strategy is still being developed, giving clients something tangible early.

New Content Opportunities in the Action Center

Beyond refreshing existing pages, the Action Center also identifies topics where competitors are earning citations, and you have no content covering them at all.

Navigate to Action Center > Boost Content Visibility > Create content inspired by competitors winning in AI citations for this view. The recommendations here are about where to create new pages or blog posts, not about tweaking what you have. If a competitor is consistently cited on a topic that aligns with your tracked prompt themes and your site has nothing on it, that’s a real gap in your AI visibility coverage, and a direct input for your content calendar.

Suggested content ideas from Writesonic.

Review this section at least quarterly alongside your standard keyword research. The two often point in the same direction.

FAQs

What KPIs matter for executive AI visibility reporting?

Lead with citation share trend direction over a rolling 90-day period, not raw citation counts. Raw numbers require too much context without supporting data. Showing category-level performance for priority topics, plus specific wins and gaps, lands better in executive reporting than a single number that needs a two-paragraph explanation.

How do you create reports showing brand visibility in AI platforms?

Use Writesonic’s Content Performance and Page Tracker views to pull citation data by URL and topic. Present directional trends and be explicit about what your prompt set covers.

How do you report AI search visibility to leadership?

Frame AI visibility as one signal alongside organic search, not a standalone metric. Show specific wins (pages gaining citation share) alongside gaps, and tie recommendations directly to business priorities. Explain volatility upfront so a single-period dip doesn’t derail an entire reporting session.

Where can you find AI visibility reports with sentiment analysis?

Writesonic includes sentiment indicators alongside citation data. You can dig deeper into how your brand is being discussed on LLMs by navigating to Overview, then the Sentiment dashboard under Brand Visibility. 

Conclusion

Most teams that struggle with AI visibility reporting don’t have a data problem. They have an interpretation problem. The numbers look strange, the volatility is hard to explain, and it’s difficult to know what to act on.

Writesonic helps with that, but only if you come in with the right expectations. Know what your prompt set covers. Organize your portfolios from the start. Read citation data as a directional trend, not a precise scorecard. Use the Action Center to find the generative engine optimization improvements most likely to move the needle quickly. Teams that build these habits now will be ahead of the curve as AI-driven search grows and the tools mature. 

Read more at Read More

Ubersuggest Keyword Ideas: What the Data Actually Tells You

Key Takeaways

  • Keyword volume is one signal, not the full story. It tells you that demand exists, but not where it lives, how it’s being answered, or whether your brand is part of the conversation.
  • The Ubersuggest keyword tool and Answer the Public now pull data from Google, Bing, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Amazon, giving you a multi-platform view of where your audience is actually searching.
  • AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini generate answers, not link lists. Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility feature tracks whether your brand appears in those answers and how your visibility compares to competitors.
  • Ubersuggest’s global keyword data lets you identify regions where demand already exists for your product or service, so you can prioritize expansion instead of guessing.
  • The highest-value content opportunities sit at the intersection of strong multi-platform demand and low brand visibility. Knowing where that gap is tells you exactly where to focus.

Search is no longer a single-channel game. For a long time, SEO meant one thing: get found on Google. But Google’s own SVP Prabhakar Raghavan noted that roughly 40 percent of young people now turn to TikTok and Instagram for searches instead of Google, a number that’s only likely to grow over time. 

Add ChatGPT, Gemini, YouTube, and other rising channels on top of that, and the picture becomes clear: keyword volume alone can’t tell you where demand actually lives, how it’s being answered, or whether your brand is part of the conversation.

The good news is that Ubersuggest is a great tool to help you adapt to this shift. I’ll cover here how Ubersuggest keyword ideas data actually surfaces, and how to layer multiple signals into a strategy built for the way search works today.

What Keyword Data Actually Tells You (And What It Doesn’t)

Keyword research is still the foundation of any solid content strategy. Search volume tells you how much interest exists around a topic. Keyword difficulty helps you gauge how competitive that space is. Search intent tells you what kind of content actually fits the query. All of that is genuinely useful, and none of it is going away.

But traditional keyword data was built for a world where Google was the only game in town. That world doesn’t exist anymore.

A user today might search “best email marketing tool” on Google, watch comparison videos on YouTube, follow threads on Reddit, scroll TikTok for creator recommendations, and then ask ChatGPT for a final opinion before choosing a product. Each of those touchpoints is a moment of demand. Most keyword research tools only capture one of them.

The practical result: you can have a well-optimized piece ranking on page one for a target keyword and still be invisible to a significant chunk of your audience. That’s not a traffic problem you can fix by adjusting your meta tags.

Two questions worth asking before you build any content plan:

  • Where does demand for this topic actually live across platforms?
  • Is my brand showing up when people ask AI tools about this subject?

Ubersuggest addresses both. Here’s how each capability works.

How the Ubersuggest Keyword Tool and Answer the Public Surface Multi-Platform Demand

If you used Answer the Public a few years ago, it was a visualization tool that pulled suggestions from Google Autocomplete. Useful, but limited to one platform.

Image related to Ubersuggest Keyword Ideas: What the Data Actually Tells You

That’s no longer what it is. Answer the Public (now integrated with the Ubersuggest keyword generator) pulls keyword and hashtag data from Google, Bing, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. That’s a meaningful shift. You’re not just seeing what people type into a search bar anymore. You’re seeing what they watch, hashtag, and shop for across the platforms where they actually spend their time.

Here’s what that looks like in practice. Enter a broad keyword like “marketing” and select a platform.

Answer the Public platform selector showing Google, Bing, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram options
Answer the Public platform selector showing Google, Bing, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram options

Switch to Instagram and you’ll see the hashtags your audience is actively using around that topic. Switch to TikTok and you get a keyword wheel showing what creators and users are searching within the app.

The Ubersuggest platform
The AnswerThePublic flywheel mode.

You can also compare how results shift over time, which tells you whether interest in a topic is growing or fading on a specific platform. That matters for content planning. A keyword might have modest Google search volume but strong TikTok traction, which is a signal that short-form video would outperform a blog post for that topic. You’d never see that from Google data alone.

For content teams, this changes the planning conversation. Rather than asking “what should we write?” you start asking “what format and platform does this topic actually call for?” That’s a more useful question, and it leads to content that actually reaches people where they’re searching. For a closer look at using the two tools together, see how to use Answer the Public with Ubersuggest.

The AI Search Layer: What Ubersuggest’s AI Visibility Data Shows You

Multi-platform keyword data covers where demand lives across traditional and social search. AI Search Visibility covers something different: whether your brand shows up when AI tools answer questions in your category.

The distinction matters more than it might seem. When someone asks ChatGPT “what’s the best CRM for a small sales team?” they don’t get ten blue links to evaluate. They get a generated answer. Your brand is either mentioned in that answer or it isn’t. There’s no page-two for AI responses.

This is the core challenge of AI search: it’s not about ranking, it’s about being cited. And right now, most brands have no systematic way to know whether they’re being cited at all.

Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility feature is built to solve that. It runs repeated queries across AI platforms, aggregates the results, and gives you a clear, data-backed picture of how often your brand appears in AI-generated responses for your most important topics. One AI response is a data point. Hundreds of responses is a pattern.

The feature surfaces four key metrics:

  • Brand Visibility %: How often your brand is mentioned across aggregated AI responses for relevant prompts.
  • Industry Rank: Where you sit relative to competitors in your space.
  • Top Prompts table: The specific questions and prompts where your brand does and doesn’t appear in AI answers.
  • Competitor Visibility trend chart: How competitors’ AI presence is changing over time.
Ubersuggest's AI search visibility function.
Ubersuggest's Top Brand Visibility function.

A note on variability: AI responses are inherently inconsistent. Ask the same question twice and you may get a different answer, different brand mentions, or a different level of detail. That’s normal, and it’s exactly why aggregating data across hundreds of repeated queries gives a more reliable read than spot-checking a single response on a given day.

One of the most actionable outputs from this feature is the Top Prompts table. It tells you which specific AI search prompts are driving brand visibility in your category, and which prompts your competitors are dominating without you. Those gaps are your content brief.

Ubersuggest's Top Prompts Function

Ubersuggest’s AI visibility features are built to cut through that noise, aggregating responses at scale so your visibility score reflects a real pattern rather than a single snapshot. This is the piece of Ubersuggest keyword research that most marketers haven’t built into their workflow yet. The window to get ahead of competitors here is still open, but it won’t be for long.

Going Global: Using Ubersuggest Data Across Markets

Expanding into new markets is one of the highest-leverage growth moves a brand can make, and one of the most expensive to get wrong. NP Digital now operates in 19 countries, and that growth wasn’t built on guesswork. It came from identifying where demand already existed and going after the regions with the clearest signal first.

Ubersuggest’s global keyword data makes that analysis accessible without a research team. Type any keyword into the Ubersuggest keyword tool, run a search, and filter by country. You’ll see where search volume for your topic is concentrated across global markets.

The insight here is about prioritization. You don’t need to tackle every market at once. You need to find the markets where demand already exists for what you offer, because those are the ones where content and campaigns can work with the grain of existing intent rather than trying to create it from scratch.

Layer in the city-level targeting from AI Search Visibility and you get a second useful data point: not just where people are searching, but where your brand is (or isn’t) showing up in localized AI responses. A market might have strong keyword volume and competitors with high AI visibility, or it might have strong volume and very little AI presence from anyone, which is a wide-open opportunity. That combination turns global expansion strategy from a gut call into a data-backed decision.

For most brands, the low-hanging fruit is closer than it looks. Start by running your core keywords through the global filter and see which regions surface demand you’re currently not serving.

How to Put It All Together

The data points covered above aren’t meant to live in separate tabs. Here’s how to run them as a single workflow.

Step one: map where demand lives.

Use the Ubersuggest keyword tool and Answer the Public to build a multi-platform picture of your topic. Pull keyword volume from Google and Bing, but don’t stop there. Check TikTok and Instagram data for hashtag and creator trends. Check YouTube for video search volume. Check Amazon if your category has a commerce angle. You’re mapping where your audience is actively searching, not just where you’ve historically published.

Step two: audit your AI search presence.

For the topics where you’ve found strong demand, run them through AI Search Visibility. Which prompts is your brand appearing for? Which ones are competitors owning? The Top Prompts table will show you both. If your competitors are consistently cited for a topic your brand should own, that’s a content and PR gap. If nobody in your space is showing up consistently, that’s a first-mover opportunity.

Step three: close the gaps.

The highest-value content opportunities sit where demand is real and brand visibility is low. Those are the topics to build content around, earn citations for, and develop PR relationships that put your brand in front of journalists and creators who influence what AI models learn over time. Publishing more isn’t the goal. Publishing the right content, on the right platforms, on the topics where you’re currently invisible, is.

This framework is repeatable. Run it quarterly as your AI search visibility data evolves and as platform demand shifts. The brands that build this into their routine workflow will compound their advantage over time. For a broader foundation on getting the most out of the platform, the Ubersuggest guide is the right place to start.

FAQs

How accurate is Ubersuggest?

Ubersuggest pulls from multiple sources, including Google’s keyword planner data, to provide search volume estimates. Like any keyword tool, these are estimates rather than exact figures. For most strategy decisions, they’re directionally reliable. For AI Search Visibility, reliability is stronger because the tool aggregates data across hundreds of repeated AI queries rather than relying on a single response, which smooths out the inherent variability of AI-generated answers.

How does Ubersuggest work?

Ubersuggest combines keyword research, site audit tools, competitive analysis, and AI visibility tracking in one platform. For traditional keyword data, it pulls from search engine databases to surface volume, difficulty scores, and related terms. For AI visibility, it runs repeated queries across tools like ChatGPT and Gemini, aggregates the results, and shows how often your brand appears in those AI-generated responses compared to competitors.

How do I use Ubersuggest for keyword research?

Head to app.neilpatel.com, enter a keyword, and review the volume, keyword difficulty score, and related term suggestions. From there, you can filter by country for global demand data, use the Content Ideas tab to see which topics are already performing well in your space, or switch over to Answer the Public to pull platform-specific data from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and Amazon alongside traditional search engines.

Conclusion

To do marketing well in today’s world, you need to optimize for multiple platforms and regions.

SEO is no longer just a “Google” game. You must optimize for YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, ChatGPT, and all the other platforms your users use.

On top of that, you should look to expand globally.

Now, it’s too hard to tackle every country, but go after the low-hanging fruit first. What other countries have demand for your products and services? Those are the countries worth considering to move into next.

Read more at Read More

Google Ads adds Gemini-powered dashboards for real-time insights

In Google Ads automation, everything is a signal in 2026

Google is bringing Gemini into Google Ads dashboards, aiming to make data analysis more interactive, visual and accessible.

What’s happening. Google Ads is rolling out a new Dashboards feature that lets advertisers explore performance data using charts, graphs and tables, powered by Gemini.

Users can customise views simply by typing prompts, with the dashboard updating in real time based on their queries.

Why we care. Data analysis in Google Ads has traditionally required manual setup and navigation across reports.

This update shifts that workflow toward a more conversational model, where advertisers ask questions and get instant visual answers.

Zoom in. Dashboards will display key metrics like impressions, clicks, video views and cost, alongside visual breakdowns of performance across devices, audiences and campaign types.

The goal is to give advertisers a clearer, faster way to understand what’s happening in their accounts.

What to watch. How widely advertisers adopt prompt-based reporting, and whether this reduces reliance on custom-built reports and external analytics tools.

What’s next. Google says more details will be shared at Google Marketing Live.

Bottom line. Google is turning reporting into a conversation — using AI to help advertisers get answers faster and act on them sooner.

Read more at Read More

Google quietly gave 54 publishers control over their Discover profiles. Here’s what they did with it.

Google Discover publishers

Google Discover has publisher profile pages. They live at profile.google.com/cp/ and appear when someone taps a publisher’s name on a Discover card. These pages aren’t new. They launched in August 2025 with the Follow button rollout, and by November 2025 Google’s documentation referred to them as “source overviews.”

For most of the 47,000+ publishers we monitored, the pages are auto-generated: a name, follower count, social links pulled from the Knowledge Graph, recent posts, and a footer label that reads “Profile generated by Google.”

Since March 2026, though, something changed for a small subset of publishers. A group gained access to enhanced profiles: custom banner images, a configurable links shelf, and the ability to pin posts (labeled “Pinned” in the publisher interface, formerly “Featured Posts”).

They also gained control over the order of their social links, website, and content tabs — something standard profiles don’t allow. On standard profiles, social links are sorted algorithmically by follower count, with the website listed last. On claimed profiles, the publisher decides.

The “Profile generated by Google” label also disappeared entirely, replaced by nothing — a quiet signal that the profile had been claimed.

There’s no public documentation explaining how to get access. No Search Console toggle. No application form. Google appears to have hand-selected participants for what is effectively an invitation-only pilot program.

We identified 54 publishers in this cohort. All are U.S.-based. All publish in English. And what they have — and haven’t — done with the feature over two months of monitoring reveals patterns every publisher should watch before the program scales.

How we found the 54

Our Profile Features Monitor tracks 46,926 publishers across seven languages: English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, and Portuguese. To isolate the enhanced cohort, we filtered for publishers that showed persistent enhanced-profile signals across multiple snapshots: active links, full banner headers, or both.

The result: 54 domains with stable access to the enhanced profile surface. The composition of that group offers clues about Google’s intentions:

Tier Publishers Examples
National 15 WSJ, Fox News, NY Post, Newsweek, Inquirer
Regional Paper 13 Boston Globe, SFGate, CT Insider, Times Union
Local TV 14 KTLA, PIX11, MyFox8, WSMV, Atlanta News First
Lifestyle Brand 6 Delish, The Dodo, Country Living, House Beautiful
Specialty 6 Pew Research, The Athletic, Gothamist, Civil Beat

The skew toward local news and community publishers is striking and aligns with Google’s public emphasis on supporting local journalism. Nearly half the cohort — 27 of 54 publishers — consists of regional newspapers and local TV stations. National brands are included too, but they’re not the majority.

The two-tier profile system

Under the hood, Google operates two distinct profile architectures. Understanding the difference matters because this isn’t just a cosmetic upgrade. It’s a structural split.

Standard profile (99.9% of publishers):

  • Auto-generated from public sources.
  • “Profile generated by Google” label visible.
  • No publisher control over content or layout.

Claimed profile (the 54 publishers):

  • No generation label.
  • Publisher can configure the banner, links shelf, and pinned post.
  • Publisher controls the order of social links, website, and content tabs (standard profiles sort them by follower count).

This isn’t Search Console verification, structured data markup, or any existing publisher tool. It’s a separate, invitation-only system.

What the 54 publishers actually did

This is where it gets interesting. Access to a feature and its effective use are different. Here’s what the data shows across each configurable surface.

Banners: professional, deliberate, tier-predictive

Forty-one of the 54 publishers uploaded a banner image. The remaining 13 have the capability — a “prepared” state — but haven’t used it yet.

What stands out is the production quality. There are no amateur banners in the cohort. Every uploaded image reflects clear professional design investment.

Five distinct visual archetypes emerged:

  • Brand-pattern: No photography, just the wordmark or abstract identity repeated as a tile. Pure prestige.
  • Editorial content: The banner shows what the publisher covers. A food shot, a puppy, a stock chart.
  • Local landmark: City skylines, local scenery, and regional identity anchors.
  • Brand-statement: Curated collages with taglines or portfolio displays:
  • Front-page archive: A grid of 12 iconic covers. Tabloid heritage as visual identity. Unique in the cohort.

Tier predicts archetype. National publishers cluster around brand-pattern banners. Local outlets lean into civic identity and city imagery. Lifestyle brands showcase their content directly.

One anomaly: The Athletic uploaded a solid black square — 656×656 pixels. Whether that reflects deliberate minimalism aligned with The Athletic’s dark UI or simply a broken upload is unclear. It’s the only non-image banner in the cohort.

The format split is revealing: 71% used square banners — likely Google’s recommended ratio — while 29% used wide landscape formats. None used portrait layouts. Based on CDN serving patterns, the minimum recommended resolution appears to be 512 pixels on the longest side.

Publishers that chose wide formats made deliberate design decisions: SecretNYC uses a manifesto-style collage, the New York Post uses a headline grid, and Barron’s uses a geometric pattern. Square appears to be the default safe option.

Links: local TV dominates, nationals ignore it

Thirty-three of the 54 publishers enabled the links feature. Of those, 31 added at least one link, for a total of 65 configured links across the cohort.

The content is overwhelmingly focused on on-site navigation: 85% of links point to the publisher’s own sections, weather pages, live streams, or app downloads. This functions more like a mini site navigation layer than a promotional surface.

The tier gap is enormous:

  • Local TV: 31 links across 14 hosts (average 2.2 per publisher). Fox affiliates consistently shelve: Watch Live, Weather, Local News, Sub-region, Contact.
  • National: 9 links across 15 hosts (average 0.6 per publisher). Most nationals didn’t bother.

Three outliers worth noting:

  • PIX11 published “How to make PIX11 a preferred source on Google,” meta-promoting Discover follows from within the Discover profile itself.
  • Gothamist funneled donations through `pledge.wnyc.org` with a purpose-specific utm_campaign=discover-profile tag.
  • Fox Nation placed a direct subscription conversion link (“Subscribe to Fox Nation”) on what most publishers treat as a navigational surface.

Pinned posts (formerly Featured Posts): capability granted, rarely used

Fifty-two of the 54 publishers enabled the Pinned feature. Only 13 currently use it with an active pinned post.

Lifestyle brands were the strongest adopters: five of six had the feature active. Among national publishers, only 2 of 15 used it. The capability exists across nearly the entire cohort. Adoption does not.

About text: Wikipedia out, self-branding in

On standard profiles, the “About” section is auto-generated by Google, usually sourced from Wikipedia. On claimed profiles, publishers write their own.

Within the cohort, 38 of 54 use a custom-written description, while only 16 retain a Wikipedia-sourced version — a surprisingly low number for publishers of this size and prominence.

The tone splits cleanly by publisher tier.

  • Local TV stations lean promotional (“Your trusted source for breaking news, accurate weather forecasts and local sports across Greensboro…” ).
  • National and digital-native publishers stay more factual (“Gothamist is a website about New York City news, arts, events and food, brought to you by New York Public Radio”).
  • One publisher takes a mission-driven approach: Delish — “you don’t have to know how to cook, you just have to love to eat!”

The implication for publishers preparing for this feature: once you claim the profile, you take control of the About section. It becomes your pitch on a Google-owned page.

Notably, the most visible publishers in the cohort chose factual descriptions over promotional copy.

UTM tracking: the blind spot

Only three of the 65 configured links include analytics parameters. Gothamist tagged its donation link with utm_campaign=discover-profile, making it the only publisher in the cohort treating the profile as a measurable acquisition channel.

The Philadelphia Inquirer instrumented two links, but one reused an Instagram bio campaign tag (mktg_acq_ig_organic_bio_offer), meaning Discover traffic from that link will be misattributed to Instagram in analytics.

The other 62 links have no tracking at all. In practice, 95% of the cohort has no way to measure whether profile links generate traffic.

Social platform priorities

On claimed profiles, publishers control the display order of social links and content tabs. Standard profiles don’t: Google sorts links algorithmically by follower count and places the website last. That means the ordering we observe on claimed profiles reflects deliberate editorial choices, not algorithmic defaults:

  • Local TV stations list Facebook first: 86% (12 of 14). Zero list X/Twitter first.
  • National publishers spread their bets: Facebook 33%, Instagram 20%, X 20%, YouTube 13%.
  • Specialty/digital-native outlets lean Instagram-first (67%).

Concrete examples: Newsweek places YouTube first and Articles second. Delish leads with Website, followed by Instagram. These are active editorial decisions about which audience channel matters most.

The local TV finding is particularly notable. Despite news media’s historical reliance on X/Twitter, not a single local station in this cohort places it as their primary social link.

Sister-site coordination

For media groups with multiple properties in the cohort, setup patterns reveal whether profile management is centralized or handled locally:

  • Hearst Connecticut, which has five papers in the cohort, shows near-identical configuration across all profiles. The links structure is the same, including a shared Hearst checkout funnel with publication-specific site IDs. The setup points to a centralized digital team managing profile operations across the group. Even so, each masthead still uses distinct banner art.
  • Dow Jones, across The Wall Street Journal and jp.wsj.com, uses shared banner artwork: the same wordmark tile, confirmed through perceptual hashing. That points to brand coordination at the asset level.
  • Everyone else Everyone else — including Fox affiliates, Dotdash Meredith properties, and the Fox News group — shows completely different setups across properties, even within owned-and-operated chains. Profile management appears to be handled locally rather than centrally.

The rollout is still active

Comparing snapshots #9 and #12 — taken 19 days apart — confirms this isn’t a frozen experiment. During that window, four publishers added banners (jp.wsj.com, New York Post, SecretNYC, and Everyday Health), one activated Links for the first time (New York Post), and jp.wsj.com (The Wall Street Journal’s Japanese edition) entered the cohort entirely.

No publishers lost features. The program is still expanding within the cohort, and new participants continue to appear.

The adoption paradox

We scored each publisher on a composite 0–6 scale, assigning one point for each of the following:

  • Banner uploaded
  • Links feature active
  • Featured Posts active
  • At least one configured link
  • Four or more social platforms listed
  • Any UTM tracking present

Nobody scored 6. The distribution:

Score Publishers %
2 22 41%
3 10 19%
4 14 26%
5 8 15%
6 0 0%

National publishers with the largest audiences are the least engaged with the configurable surface, with a mean score of 2.93. Most uploaded a banner and stopped there.

Local TV stations — despite having the smallest Discover footprints — are the most engaged, with a mean score of 3.57. Lifestyle brands score highest overall at 3.83, yet their Discover visibility trajectory is the flattest in the cohort.

And here’s the critical finding: feature adoption shows no correlation with visibility trajectory.

Across the cohort, the 180-day late/early capture ratio ranges from 0.23x for Prevention — down 77% — to 4.27x for NewsNation — up 327%. Variance is massive within every tier.

KTLA scores high on adoption, with seven links, a full banner, and active profile engagement, and grew 3.69x. But Delish also scores high and declined to 0.90x. MyFox8 configured five links and fell to 0.52x.

Publishers that fully utilized the configurable surface show no better visibility trajectory than those who used it minimally.

This feature gives publishers a controlled surface for branding and navigation, not a ranking lever. It’s a profile page, not an algorithm input.

What this means for publishers

The program is U.S.-only and invitation-only for now. Across the six other language markets we monitor — French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, and Portuguese — we found zero enhanced profile deployments: not a single banner or configured link outside the English-language cohort.

But the underlying infrastructure is already in place. All 47,000+ publishers we track already have profile pages with follower counts, social links, and content feeds. The enhanced features sit on top of that existing architecture. Google isn’t rebuilding the system. It’s selectively unlocking capabilities within it.

If — or when — Google scales this, here’s how publishers should prepare:

  • Audit your structured data now. Profile social links are pulled from your sameAs/JSON-LD markup. Errors there will carry over to your profile. Verify what Google will display before you’re given control.
  • Design a banner. Use a square format (1:1 ratio) with a minimum resolution of 512px, and treat it as a professional brand asset. The 54 publishers in this cohort set a clear standard: there were no amateur images. Think about which archetype fits your brand: a wordmark tile for prestige brands, local landmarks for regional publishers, or content-driven imagery for vertical and lifestyle outlets.
  • Plan your link strategy. The data suggests that section navigation and utility content — weather, live streams, and similar recurring destinations — drive the most engagement. Local TV stations treating the profile as a mini site navigation layer are the clearest power users. Decide now which five to seven links represent your most valuable entry points.
  • Instrument from day one. Almost nobody in the current cohort tracks profile link performance. Adding a dedicated UTM campaign parameter — utm_campaign=discover-profile, for example — would put you ahead of 95% of the pilot group on attribution alone.
  • If you’re a media group, decide your operating model. Should profile management be centralized or handled newsroom by newsroom? The cohort shows both models. Hearst Connecticut runs one coordinated setup across five papers, while Fox affiliates manage profiles independently at the station level. The important part is that the choice is deliberate — not something decided accidentally when individual newsrooms start receiving invitations.

Methodology

Data comes from the 1492.vision Profile Features Monitor, which tracks roughly 47,000 publishers across seven languages through recurring snapshots of profile metadata. The 54-publisher cohort was identified through persistent enhanced-feature signals observed across multiple snapshots between March and May 2026.

Visibility trajectories are based on proprietary capture data. All findings are descriptive only: the cohort reflects Google’s selection criteria, not a random sample, and this dataset does not support causal claims about feature impact.

The full analysis — including the complete 10-phase timeline, banner image gallery, snapshot-by-snapshot evolution, and tier-by-tier breakdowns — is available at 1492.vision/research/discover-publisher-profiles-en.

Read more at Read More

Google Discover performance reporting bug in Search Console

Google has confirmed a bug with the Discover report within Google Search Console. Google had a data “logging” error that caused a decrease in clicks and impressions for the Discover report between the dates of May 7, 2026 until May 8, 2026.

Google said this is just a “data logging only” and your positioning in Google Discover was not impacted.

The issue. Google again said a data logging issue caused reporting issues with the Discover report between May 7, 2026, and May 8, 2026.

This may have resulted in a “decrease in clicks and impressions in the Discover performance report,” Google posted.

Why we care. There were a number of publishers noticing a drop in clicks and impressions based on this report, keep in mind, if you do also, it is likely related to this reporting bug.

Annotate your reporting and update your stakeholders that May 7 – May 8 data for Discover was broken and should be disregarded.

Read more at Read More

How soft 404s and indexing issues caused a 90% traffic collapse

How soft 404s and indexing issues caused a 90% traffic collapse

When a website migration goes wrong, the consequences can be a devastating loss of organic traffic and revenue. But what happens when the damage isn’t immediately visible? What if Google is silently deprioritizing your content, page by page, until your traffic has evaporated?

This is the case study of how a multinational media organization lost 90% of its traffic following a domain migration, and how addressing a seemingly harmless technical issue — soft 404 errors — helped unlock suppressed traffic potential across 13 country-specific domains.

While this case study examines events from 2021–2023, the lessons learned remain timeless and directly applicable to any site facing indexing challenges today.

The catastrophic drop

In January, 2022, the Brazilian localization of a cryptocurrency news website completed a domain migration. After the transition, traffic didn’t just drop — it plummeted. Comparing December 2021 to December 2022, both sessions and pageviews had fallen approximately 90% year-over-year.

According to Google Search Console data, the old domain (xx.com.br) was receiving between 15,000 to 25,000 clicks per day before migration. After migrating to the new subdomain structure (br.xx.com) in January, traffic collapsed and never recovered. It stabilized at around 2,000 to 4,000 clicks per day — a sustained loss that persisted for over a year.

The migration coincided with three major Google algorithm updates in June 2021: the core update, spam update, and page experience update. While these updates caused the expected temporary volatility, the Brazilian site showed no signs of recovery.

Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.

The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

The migration problem: More than just redirects

Domain migrations typically show an initial traffic drop as Google recrawls and reassesses the site. That’s expected.

Normally, this traffic recovers within weeks or months. In this case, there were no signs of recovery.

The root cause? The old domain continued to be crawled by Google long after the migration.

According to the team’s analysis, proper redirect implementation and technical migration protocols weren’t fully implemented, causing Google to split its crawl budget between two domains rather than consolidating authority on the new one.

In mid-August 2022, after addressing the migration issues with the SEO and IT teams, there was a subtle uptick — a peak of 12 clicks and 37 impressions on Aug. 29, 2022. While modest, this represented the first signs of recovery and indicated that Google was beginning to properly recognize the new domain.

Using Facebook Prophet forecasting on pre-migration data, the team estimated that without the migration issues, the Brazilian site would have exceeded 2 million monthly clicks by early 2022. Instead, it was generating a fraction of that traffic.

Understanding the indexing bottleneck

While fixing the migration was critical, it revealed a deeper problem affecting not just Brazil, but all 13 of the site’s country domains: a massive indexing backlog.

Google’s page processing follows four stages:

  • Crawl: Google discovers and reads pages.
  • Render: The page code is rendered.
  • Index: Pages wait in a queue to be stored in Google’s index.
  • Rank: Pages appear in search results with rankings.

The Brazilian site was taking an average of 2 minutes for Google to crawl new articles (an acceptable amount of time for a news site). However, indexing these articles was taking 24 hours. For time-sensitive cryptocurrency news, this delay was catastrophic. By the time the site’s articles were indexed, the news cycle had already moved on.

The scale of the site migration problem: 513,000 crawled, but not indexed, pages

In January 2023, Google Search Console revealed alarming indexing issues across all domains:

  • Crawled – currently not indexed: 513,369 pages (Brazil alone)
  • Soft 404: 1,193 pages and growing rapidly
  • Alternate page with proper canonical tag: 2,532 pages
  • Discovered – currently not indexed: 524 pages

The “Crawled – currently not indexed” issue was particularly concerning. These were pages that Google had successfully crawled but chose not to index. This typically happens when Google considers a page low-quality, duplicate, or not worth the crawl budget.

Upon investigation, the team discovered that converter pages (e.g., “/usd-to-thor?amount=250” or “/eur-to-signaturechain?amount=1000”) were being automatically generated at scale. These thin content pages were consuming Google’s crawl budget, causing it to deprioritize the entire domain.

The soft 404 time bomb

While fixing the migration and removing low-quality pages was important, the most insidious issue was the proliferation of soft 404 errors.

A soft 404 occurs when a page returns a 200 (success) status code but actually contains no meaningful content — essentially a “page not found” that doesn’t properly signal its emptiness to search engines. Unlike hard 404s, which clearly communicate that the page doesn’t exist, soft 404s confuse search engines and waste crawl budgets.

The data revealed this wasn’t isolated to Brazil. Soft 404 errors were growing exponentially across multiple domains:

  • xx.com (main site): 90,400 affected pages
  • es.xx.com (Spain): 17,700 pages
  • kr.xx.com (Korea): 15,400 pages
  • fr.xx.com (France): 15,100 pages
  • de.xx.com (Germany): 8,010 pages

Specifically for France, Google Search Console data showed a direct correlation: As soft 404 errors began accumulating in October 2022, total crawl requests dropped from 60,000–70,000 per day to just 20,000–30,000 per day. Google was literally giving up on crawling the site efficiently.

The crawl budget crisis

The concept of crawl budget is critical to understanding why soft 404s matter so much.

Search engines allocate a finite amount of resources to crawl each website. If Google wastes time crawling broken, empty, or duplicate pages, it has less capacity to discover and index your valuable content.

For news sites publishing dozens of articles daily, this creates a vicious cycle: New content doesn’t get indexed quickly, engagement drops, Google further reduces crawl budget, and the problem compounds.

In January 2023, Google was wasting significant resources crawling pages that provided no value. This meant:

  • Slower indexing of new, timely content.
  • Reduced visibility in search results.
  • Lost traffic opportunities.
  • Degraded domain authority in Google’s eyes.

The systematic fix: Addressing root causes of site migration problems

Starting Jan. 31, 2023, the team implemented a comprehensive technical SEO remediation plan focused on three priorities:

Urgent: Soft 404 resolution

The team identified the source of soft 404 errors and implemented proper HTTP status codes. Pages that truly didn’t exist began returning proper 404 or 410 status codes. Pages with content were fixed to render properly.

High priority: Crawl budget optimization

  • Removed or noindexed automatically generated currency converter pages.
  • Implemented stricter URL parameter handling.
  • Used robots.txt to block low-value URL patterns.
  • Set up proper canonicalization for variant pages.

Medium priority: Core Web Vitals

While user experience metrics were important, the team recognized that fixing indexing issues would have a more immediate impact than optimizing page speed. Core Web Vitals improvements were addressed, but not at the expense of resolving indexing bottlenecks.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


The results: Dramatic recovery across all domains

Weeks after implementing the fixes, the impact was measurable:

Brazil (br.xx.com)

  • Crawled – currently not indexed: Dropped from 513,000 to 220,000 pages (57% reduction).
  • Soft 404 errors: Reduced from 1,193 to 370 pages (69% reduction).
  • Traffic recovery: Visible upward trajectory starting early 2023.

Germany (de.xx.com)

  • Indexed pages: Increased from ~150,000 to 370,748.
  • Total clicks: Rose from ~8,000/day average to sustained 12,000-15,000/day.
  • Google Discover traffic share: Jumped from 42% to 58%.

Poland (pl.xx.com)

  • Indexed pages: Grew from ~100,000 to 135,556.
  • Total clicks: Increased significantly with multiple traffic spikes above 30,000/day.
  • Google Discover traffic share: Rose from 15% to 86%.

Spain (es.xx.com)

  • Google Discover clicks: Increased from ~450,000 to 912,721 total.
  • Traffic distribution: Discover now represents 65% of total traffic.

All domains combined

By late April 2023, soft 404 errors across all domains had dropped from a peak of approximately 120,000 pages to under 20,000 — an 83% reduction.

Most remarkably, the biggest traffic gains came from Google Discover — Google’s personalized content recommendation feed. As indexing health improved, Google began trusting the domains enough to recommend their content more aggressively to users.

The Core Web Vitals paradox

Interestingly, improvements to Core Web Vitals (page speed, interactivity, and visual stability) showed mixed results:

Desktop improvements:

  • Germany: 25.1% → 97.1% good URLs
  • Poland: 20.5% → 68.9% good URLs
  • Korea: 15% → 84.6% good URLs

Mobile challenges:

  • Brazil: 0% → 0% (no improvement)
  • Argentina: 0% → 0%
  • Thailand: 0% → 0%
  • Korea: 93.4% → 0.5% (severe regression)
  • Turkey: 94% → 0% (severe regression)

The team’s hypothesis: Core Web Vitals performance is heavily influenced by regional factors like CDN proximity, server location, network quality, and device capabilities. Countries with poor mobile infrastructure or greater server distance showed minimal improvement despite technical optimizations.

This reinforced an important lesson: Not all technical SEO issues affect all markets equally. A one-size-fits-all approach would have wasted resources by optimizing for metrics that couldn’t improve without infrastructure investment, while the real wins came from addressing indexing fundamentals.

Key technical SEO lessons

1. Indexing issues trump almost everything else

No amount of content quality, backlinks, or page speed optimization matters if Google isn’t indexing your pages. Before optimizing what’s visible, ensure your content is actually being indexed.

2. Soft 404s are silent killers

Unlike hard 404s that immediately alert you to problems, soft 404s quietly accumulate, degrading your crawl budget until you notice traffic declining. Regular monitoring of Google Search Console‘s “Pages” report is essential.

3. Domain migrations require exhaustive validation

The Brazilian site’s migration issues persisted for over a year. A proper migration protocol should include:

  • Complete redirect mapping verification.
  • Confirmation of old domain deindexing.
  • Search Console property setup and validation.
  • Multi-week monitoring of both old and new domains.
  • Crawl rate and indexing speed tracking.

4. Crawl budget is real for high-volume sites

For sites publishing 10+ articles daily across multiple domains, crawl budget optimization is not optional. Automatically generated pages, URL parameters, and infinite scroll implementations can quickly consume available crawl resources.

5. Regional differences demand regional solutions

Core Web Vitals data showed that Brazil, Argentina, and Thailand couldn’t achieve the same performance as European markets. Instead of forcing uniform standards, prioritize fixes tailored to each market that can actually succeed.

6. Google Discover is increasingly critical

For news and timely content publishers, Google Discover accounts for a substantial share of traffic in some markets. But Discover only promotes content from sites Google trusts — and technical issues like soft 404s directly erode that trust.

Practical site migration implementation guide

For teams facing similar challenges, here’s a systematic approach:

Weeks 1-2: Audit and prioritize

  • Access Google Search Console for all properties.
  • Export “Page indexing” reports for all domains.
  • Identify the scale of each issue category.
  • Calculate the trend (growing, stable, or declining).
  • Prioritize based on issue volume and growth rate.

Weeks 3-4: Fix soft 404s

  • Sample 20–30 URLs from the soft 404 report.
  • Identify common patterns (empty pages, broken functionality, etc.).
  • Implement proper HTTP status codes (404, 410, or fix the content).
  • Validate fixes in Google Search Console.
  • Monitor for reduction in affected pages.

Weeks 5-8: Address crawled but not indexed

  • Analyze URLs to identify auto-generated content.
  • Implement robots.txt rules or noindex tags for low-value pages.
  • Review and strengthen internal linking to important pages.
  • Ensure proper canonicalization across variants.
  • Request reindexing via Search Console for key pages.

Weeks 9-12: Monitor and optimize

  • Track indexing coverage weekly.
  • Monitor crawl rate changes in Search Console.
  • Measure organic traffic recovery.
  • Identify remaining outlier issues.
  • Document learnings for future migrations.

Calculating the traffic loss from migration issues

How significant was this suppressed traffic opportunity?

According to Facebook Prophet forecasting based on pre-migration data, the Brazilian site was trending toward 20,000+ daily clicks. At the time of fix implementation in early 2023, it was receiving approximately 5,000–7,000 daily clicks. This represented roughly 6575% of potential traffic being suppressed — or conversely, the site was only achieving 25–35% of its forecasted potential.

More broadly, across all 13 domains, the soft 404 and indexing issues prevented approximately 500,000 pages from being indexed. Given average click-through rates for indexed pages, this represented millions of potential monthly impressions and hundreds of thousands of potential clicks being left on the table.

See the complete picture of your search visibility.

Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

Technical debt compounds

The most important lesson from this case study is that technical SEO issues don’t stay static — they compound. What starts as a few hundred soft 404s becomes thousands, then tens of thousands.

Google’s response isn’t immediate punishment, but gradual deprioritization. Traffic doesn’t crash overnight; it bleeds slowly.

For the Brazilian site, it took over a year to recognize the full scope of the problem. During that year, competitors filled the gap, topical authority eroded, and recovery became exponentially harder.

The good news? Once identified and systematically addressed, these issues are fixable. Within 12 weeks of implementing the remediation plan, every domain showed measurable improvement. Some saw traffic double or triple.

Technical SEO is often seen as unglamorous maintenance work. But as this case demonstrates, it’s the foundation upon which all other optimization rests. Before worrying about AI-generated content, E-E-A-T signals, or the latest algorithm update, ensure Google can actually find, crawl, and index your content.

Because the best content in the world is worthless if it’s trapped outside search engine indexes.

Read more at Read More

Web Design and Development San Diego

Why vibe coding is becoming an SEO advantage

Why vibe coding is becoming an SEO advantage

SEO used to be constrained by one thing more than anything else: dependency.

Dependency on developers, roadmaps, and “maybe next quarter.”

If you wanted a new page template, a calculator, a comparison widget, or even a simple interactive component, you had to ask, wait, and compromise. That’s changing fast.

If you’re in SEO or GEO today and you’re not learning how to vibe code, you’re limiting your impact.

Vibe coding changed the power dynamics in SEO

A few years ago, building tools like calculators or interactive widgets meant tickets, specs, and dev cycles.

Today, with AI, I’ve personally built dozens of mini apps, tools, and UI components without involving a single developer.

Some of those tools are small. Some are relatively ugly but effective. Some now bring in thousands of organic sessions per month.

Entire pages built around a vibe-coded tool are now outperforming traditional text-heavy competitors.

Parents Hub "Back To School Countdown" Vibe-Coded Tool
Parents Hub “Back To School Countdown” Vibe-Coded Tool

Even more importantly, I’ve introduced this mindset to my SEO team, and they’re now building tools on their own to achieve our search goals. That alone changes everything.

SEO teams can now move faster, test ideas immediately, and reserve developers for actual engineering work, including new templates, infrastructure, and scaling.

And yes, there’s something genuinely satisfying about building a tool yourself, publishing it, and watching it attract traffic month after month.

You don’t need to build fancy things. Just things that get the job done.

Dig deeper: Inspiring examples of responsible and realistic vibe coding for SEO

Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.

The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

Stop talking about user personas. Start talking to them.

Everyone agrees on the user persona theory:

  • Identify user personas.
  • Understand their pain points.
  • Create content that addresses them.

What almost no one explains is how to actually present that information.

Historically, SEO handled personas with text:

  • “If you’re a parent…” 
  • “For families…” 
  • “Business travelers should consider…”

That approach is already outdated. Today, we can let users self-identify and surface only the information that matters to them.

One example from a brand I manage:

  • A vibe-coded tabbed component.
  • Each tab represents a different user persona.
  • Clicking a tab reveals persona-specific content.

For airport transfers in Majorca, a “family” persona doesn’t care about the same things as a solo traveler.

Example case of the "User Persona" component
Example case of the “User Persona” component

They care about vehicle safety, child seats, family-friendly routes, vehicle size, and indicative pricing. That content appears only when the Family tab is selected.

From an SEO and GEO standpoint, persona pain points were sourced directly from Google Search Console and query fan-out analysis.

The component was then vibe-coded and placed where intent needed to be satisfied immediately.

This aligns with how AI platforms already structure answers: segmented, persona-aware, and intent-first.

Entire traffic categories can be built on tools alone

On one personal project, we launched a brand-new Tools category — ten pages with simple tools, such as:

  • Calculators.
  • Checklists.
  • Calendars.
  • Countdown timers.
  • AI generators.

Each page leads with the tool and uses supporting components to answer sub-intents.

The result? More than 5,000 incremental clicks in two months. Most of those pages were also out of season.

Dig deeper: How to vibe-code an SEO tool without losing control of your LLM

UI is now a ranking lever

SEOs have never been more capable. The only real limitation left is creativity.

One of the most underrated SEO advantages today is how information is visually presented.

Text is cheap. Everyone can produce it. UI that answers intent instantly isn’t.

I’ve seen:

  • Two calculator pages add 10,000 monthly organic sessions.
  • One tool page rank in the top three within days for a high-volume government query.
  • Multiple seasonal pages rank off-season purely because the UI was better.

When competitors list information, we let users interact with it.

  • Eligibility calculators. 
  • Countdown timers. 
  • Dynamic tables. 
  • Visual comparisons.

These pages still include text. But the text supports the tool, not the other way around.

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


‘SEO takes time’ — except when it doesn’t

One page we published targeted a Greek government school financial support program with a high-volume head term, dozens of long-tail queries, and extremely text-heavy competition.

We built:

  • A financial support eligibility tool.
  • A transparent explanation of the algorithm logic behind the tool for E-E-A-T.
  • Common rejection mistakes parents made when applying for support.
  • Historical program changes.
  • A step-by-step application flow.
Parents Hub Kindergarten Financial Support Eligibility Calculator
Parents Hub Kindergarten Financial Support Eligibility Calculator

We tagged the tool as a WebApplication, implemented HowTo schema for the process, and properly marked up the FAQs.

Three days after publishing, the page was already ranking on the first page for the main term and generating about 100 clicks.

Sometimes SEO really doesn’t take that long if you solve the problem better than anyone else.

Tools are the ultimate SEO and PR assets

Some tools are built purely for traffic. Others are designed to become linkable digital assets.

A pregnancy due date calculator, a baby name generator, or a comparison table based on TripAdvisor data isn’t just a page. It’s a potential PR campaign.

When a digital asset solves a real pain point, looks modern, answers intent better than SERP features, and has clear PR angles, that’s where SEO, PR, and branding start to collide. That’s when things get really interesting.

Dig deeper: How vibe coding is changing search marketing workflows

Finding tool-page opportunities is easier than ever

With MCP servers from SEO tools, you can now surface tool ideas directly from search demand without leaving the chat, assess difficulty instantly, and launch faster than ever.

I’ve built and launched multiple tool pages this way, and the speed difference compared with traditional workflows is massive.

We’re entering a period where ideation, validation, and execution can all happen in days, not months.

See the complete picture of your search visibility.

Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.

Start Free Trial
Get started with

Semrush One Logo

The big shift

SEO is no longer about who can write the longest article, rephrase the same information better, or game templates. It’s about who answers intent fastest, removes friction, and builds search experiences instead of documents.

Vibe coding changed who gets to build. And right now, the people embracing it are pulling away fast. If you want to win in modern SEO and GEO, build tools, build components, and build search experiences. Text alone isn’t enough anymore. And honestly, that’s a very good thing.

Dig deeper: Build your own AI search visibility tracker for under $100/month

Read more at Read More