How GEO Transforms AI Search
GEO transforms AI search by shifting optimization from keyword rankings to AI citation criteria – enabling brands to appear in […]
The post How GEO Transforms AI Search appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
GEO transforms AI search by shifting optimization from keyword rankings to AI citation criteria – enabling brands to appear in […]
The post How GEO Transforms AI Search appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) requires a systematic approach. Here are all 12 steps before we dive into the details: Audit […]
The post The Ultimate GEO Checklist: 12 Steps to Optimize Your Brand appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
The SEO-to-AI Citation Disconnect Traditional SEO rankings don’t translate to AI search visibility. The numbers are stark: 12% of AI-cited […]
The post Who to Trust? A Ranking of the Top AI Search Methodologies on the Market appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
Why the Terminology Confusion Isn’t Your Fault GEO was formally defined in November 2023 – less than two years ago […]
The post GEO vs. AEO vs. AI SEO vs. LLMO: What These Terms Actually Mean appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
The 9 Proven AI Search Strategies for SaaS in 2025 Build the Business Case First – Quantify the cost of […]
The post Best AI Search Strategies for SaaS Companies in 2025: 9 Proven Approaches appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
Zero-search discovery is when AI systems proactively surface relevant information based on context, user history, and anticipated needs before a […]
The post Zero-Click Search Is Evolving Into Zero-Search Discovery: Here’s Why appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
Why Your Brand Isn’t Appearing in ChatGPT Recommendations The problem isn’t your marketing team or your SEO agency. ChatGPT evaluates […]
The post How ChatGPT Decides Which Brands to Recommend appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
The Core Problem: Your Keyword Tools Were Never Accurate Keyword research tools have significant accuracy problems that most teams never […]
The post Why Traditional Keyword Research Fails in AI Search appeared first on Onely.
Read more at Read More
AI search is reshaping how ecommerce brands get discovered.
One week, your products show up in ChatGPT. The next week, they’re replaced by competitors.
For many brands, this uncertainty can feel overwhelming.
Organic visibility now depends less on rankings and keywords, and more on how LLMs gather information, which platforms they rely on, and what signals help them highlight your brand.
In this guide, I’ll explain this crucial shift in detail.
I’ll unpack:
If you’re familiar with SEO, getting AI visibility is similar. It starts with how search systems decide what to display.
But for years, ecommerce SEO was a linear equation: rank = visibility = traffic (and then conversions).
AI search is changing that.
LLMs summarize, compare, and recommend products, all in one place.
In short: Shoppers can discover your products, check alternatives, and make buying decisions within AI chats.
In this new setup, brands compete across three different discovery models.
Mentions drive product discovery and build top-of-funnel LLM visibility for your brand.
This is where your brand gets featured in AI-generated answers, often without a link to your site.

Mentions often come from reputation signals like:
Put simply, you become part of the conversation.
For new or emerging brands, this is often the first touchpoint to reach shoppers through AI.
Citations are linked references within AI-generated results, like a footnote in an essay.
With citations, LLMs attribute specific information, claims, or data points to your pages.

Your brand becomes a source of truth in AI responses and gains credibility.
How?
When an AI tool cites your brand, it signals to shoppers that you’re an authoritative voice.
Plus, citations can support your positioning. The AI tools can pull your framing and product narrative into their response. Not someone else’s.
AI platforms actively recommend products for a shopper’s specific needs and concerns.
This is the most impactful layer for ecommerce brands.
Your products can show up with pricing, ratings, and other details.
This type of visibility effectively merges discovery and purchase in one place.

This happens when the LLM reviews the query, compares options, and picks your product as the best fit.
Showing up in the list of recommended products makes your brand a part of the decision interface.
Shoppers can compare specs, prices, and reviews — or even purchase — right in the AI chatbot or search tool itself.
AI visibility as a discipline is still evolving rapidly. But there are clear patterns to which ecommerce brands get seen and which get sidelined.
Two driving forces at play are: consensus and consistency.
With traditional search, ecommerce brands could build domain authority through activities like link building and digital PR. Strong pages from an authority perspective tended to perform well in search results.
In AI search, LLMs don’t evaluate your website and product pages in isolation. Authority is built from a consensus across sources.
LLMs ask: “What do credible sources agree on about this product?”
To decide which brands and products deserve visibility, LLMs cross-reference multiple sources, like:

So, a glowing review on your PDP might mean little if customers on Amazon consistently leave 1-star ratings.
And a publisher’s feature loses impact if Reddit users repeatedly recommend your competitors instead.
In other words: No single source determines your likelihood of being mentioned or cited. It’s the pattern of consensus across multiple platforms that does this.
For example:
Keychron frequently shows up when you use AI search tools to find mechanical keyboards.
This happens because the brand has earned trust through various sources:

Each trust signal on its own is valuable.
But when taken together, LLMs see a pattern of independent sources validating the same brand/product for a specific use case.
LLMs don’t crawl and rank pages the way traditional search engines do.
Instead, when answering a product-related query, an AI model might pull:

If your product title is “stainless steel” on Amazon but “brushed metal” on Walmart, the LLM can’t decide which is correct. This inconsistency could make the AI tool less likely to include any information about your product. Or it could include the wrong information.
This is why data hygiene is crucial for building AI visibility.
You need to maintain a clean, synchronized identity for every product across every channel.

Your product attributes should follow the same pattern across your site, marketplaces, and feeds:
LLMs use these data points to match your products to queries and validate claims across sources.
Your Amazon listing, your Shopify store, your Google Merchant feed — all sources need to tell the same story with the same data.
So, the same SKU name, image, and product description should appear everywhere your product appears.
Finally, outdated data signals decay, and models may deprioritize products with outdated info.
When you change a price or update a key spec, that change should be visible everywhere. Stock availability, pricing, and features should always be up to date.
We’re seeing clear patterns in what gets cited, mentioned, or ignored in AI search for ecommerce.
Understanding these patterns can be the difference between hoping you show up and knowing how to position your brand so that you do show up.
Here’s what’s currently doing well in AI search for ecommerce:
I wanted to see which brands are cited most frequently in LLM responses for ecommerce queries — so I tested it.
I picked nine popular ecommerce niches and searched category-specific queries across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and AI Mode.
Based on the responses, I made a list of five popular brands showing up frequently for each vertical.
Then, I jumped to the “Competitor Research” tab in Semrush’s AI Visibility Toolkit to run a gap analysis for these five brands in each category.
The “Sources” tab showed which domains LLMs cite most frequently, like this for the “outdoor travel & gear” niche:

This data reveals where LLMs pull product information, and which platforms matter most in your vertical.

Here’s what this data tells you:
Going beyond these top-cited platforms, here are the kinds of content LLMs link to most frequently for ecommerce queries:
These are product roundups, buying guides, and comparison posts from established media outlets.
For example, I asked ChatGPT for the best Bluetooth speaker recommendations.
It cites publishers like TechRadar, Rtings.com, and Stereo Guide for this response.
Getting featured in these listicles means you’re part of the source material LLMs use to compile information.

AI models use publisher listicles as sources because they:

Retailers like Amazon, Walmart, and Target are among the most frequently cited sources for product queries.
When I asked Perplexity about the NutriBullet Turbo, it cited the product pages from the likes of Walmart and Macy’s.
These PDPs provide structured data points like ratings, pricing, and key specs.

AI models often rely on these product pages because they:

In-depth product testing content from experts is another important source for citations.
These websites test products systematically and publish detailed findings.
LLMs can then use this empirical data as the basis for their responses.
For example, I asked Claude to find the best mattress for side sleepers.
The tool references sites like NapLab, Consumer Reports, and Sleep Foundation for data-backed recommendations.

AI models consider lab test or expert review content for citations because they:

Conversations on Reddit, Facebook groups, and YouTube comments frequently appear in AI responses.
This is especially true for subjective queries like “Is X worth it?” or “What do people actually think about Y?”
I tested this myself by asking Perplexity whether the Instant Pot Duo is worth buying.
It pulled insights from multiple Reddit threads, a Facebook group, and a YouTube video to respond based on real user input.

Brands that get mentioned positively across multiple Reddit threads build “cultural proof.”
And those organic discussions about your brand feed directly into AI training data and real-time search results.
AI models pull from these communities because they:

Content that compares two or more products can also help LLMs find the right brands to mention in their response.
When I ask AI Mode for alternatives to the supplement brand Athletic Greens, it mentions five options.
The sources include several comparison articles (alongside some roundups).

Being included in this type of content (even if you’re not the winner) can help build your visibility.
This could be Brand A vs. Brand B blog posts, YouTube videos, review sites, and social media discussions.
AI models refer to these resources because they:

Let’s now consider the business impact of this AI search setup for your ecommerce brand.
The traditional ecommerce funnel was built on multiple touchpoints.
A shopper might:
Each step was an opportunity for your brand to show up, make an impression, and win their trust.
For a lot of purchase decisions, AI search collapses this entire journey into a single interaction.
The same shoppers can now go to AI tools and ask, “What’s the best air fryer for a small kitchen?”
They get a single response with buying criteria, product recommendations, pricing, ratings, and more.

Now, clearly this isn’t going to happen for every purchase decision. These tools are still new for one thing, and it takes a lot to majorly shift buyer behavior. (And of course, SEO is not dead.)
But discovery, evaluation, and consideration CAN all happen in one response now. The AI agent performs the research labor.
That means you have fewer chances to influence buyers.
In the past, if a shopper didn’t discover you in organic search, they might find you through a review site, a Reddit thread, or a retargeting ad.
In other words: You could lose the first touchpoint and still win the sale three touchpoints later.
With AI search, you might only get one shot: the initial response.
For many ecommerce queries, AI tools give you a curated list of options. If you’re not in that initial answer, you don’t exist in the decision process.
As AI platforms make it easy for shoppers to buy directly within the chat, you often won’t get a second chance.
Take action: Build an AI search strategy using our Seen & Trusted Brand Framework to increase the probability of your brand getting featured in AI responses.
Your brand might frequently show up in AI search. But your analytics show flat traffic and zero conversions traced back to AI tools.
Here’s why:
Not all AI visibility is created equal.
Your brand can appear in 10 different AI responses and drive 10 completely different business outcomes.
It all depends on how you’re presented.
Here’s what the visibility spectrum actually looks like for ecommerce brands:
| Visibility Type | Example | Business Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Mentioned without context | “Popular air fryer brands include Ninja, Cosori, Instant Pot, and Philips.” | Value: Brand awareness Purchase Likelihood: Low |
| Mentioned with attributes | “Cosori is known for its large capacity and intuitive controls.” | Value: Stronger positioning Purchase Likelihood: Low-Medium |
| Cited as source | “According to Cosori’s specifications, the air fryer’s temperature range is 170-400°F and includes a 2-year warranty.” | Value: Credibility + potential traffic Purchase Likelihood: Medium-High |
| Recommended | “The Cosori 5.8-quart model includes 11 presets, uses 85% less oil than deep frying, fits a 3-pound chicken, and costs around $120.” | Value: Active consideration and purchase Purchase Likelihood: High |
That means getting mentioned is table stakes, not the end goal.
Building brand awareness without differentiation just makes you a part of the crowd.
To drive real sales, you need to earn citations and product recommendations.
The brands winning in AI search are:
When shoppers find products through AI but buy elsewhere, analytics tools can’t track the whole journey.
This creates two problems:
Tools like Semrush’s AI SEO Toolkit are closing this gap by showing how your brand and competitors appear in AI search.
I used the tool to check the AI visibility and search performance for Vuori, an athleisure brand.
The brand has a score of 76 against the industry average of 82, and is frequently mentioned AND cited in AI responses.

The toolkit also identifies specific prompts where your brand is mentioned or missing.
This makes it easy to spot exactly which type of queries are driving visibility and which represent missed opportunities.
For example, here’s a list of prompts where LLMs don’t feature Vuori, but do mention its competitors.

Go to the “Cited Sources” tab to find out the websites that LLMs most commonly refer to for your industry-related queries.
For Vuori, it’s sites like Reddit, Men’s Health, Forbes, and more.

The “Source Opportunities” tab will give you a list of key sites that mention your competitors, but not you. These are sites you should aim to get your brand included on.
Besides tracking your own AI visibility, the AI SEO Toolkit also lets you monitor your competitors’ performance on AI platforms.
The “Competitor Research” report compares you to your biggest competitors in terms of overall AI visibility.
It also highlights topics and prompts where other brands are featured, but you aren’t.

Learn more about how these tools can help you boost your visibility with our full Semrush AI SEO Toolkit guide.
If you want to see what winning in AI search actually looks like, look at the cookware brand, Caraway.
When you ask AI about the “best bakeware set” or the “best ceramic pans,” Caraway almost always makes the shortlist.

Data from Semrush’s AI SEO Toolkit shows that Caraway also outweighs its biggest competitors in AI visibility.

Let’s break down how Caraway built this advantage.
Caraway is frequently featured on publishers like Taste of Home, Good Housekeeping, and Food and Wine.
These are the actual sources LLMs cite when constructing answers about cookware-related queries.

For example, here’s a paragraph from the Food and Wine article ChatGPT cited as a source, which mentions the attributes ChatGPT used in its recommendation:

Caraway also earns mentions through organic discussions on Reddit, Quora, and kitchen forums.

Caraway’s clean Amazon Brand Store and on-site product pages also make it easily citable.
These product listings and pages give LLMs concrete signals like:
These retailer PDPs become credible sources for verifying pricing, availability, or product specs.

Caraway also runs an affiliate program, and the brand makes it frictionless for publishers to feature its products through:

This all makes it easy for Caraway to work with influencers and other publishers to promote its products. And these publishers can then appear as citations when AI tools make their recommendations.
For example, all the highlighted sources in the ChatGPT conversation below contain Caraway affiliate links:

Many style media and mainstream outlets reference Caraway in their content.
Here’s a recent example from an Architectural Digest interview featuring the cookware set as an essential kitchen item.

This creates more authority for the brand in the cookware and kitchen category.
You now know how the game works and who’s winning. It’s your turn to play it.
But there’s a lot to do.
Making your site readable by LLMs, opmtimizing your structured data, and setting up automated product feeds are just stratching the surface.
Our comprehensive Ecommerce AIO Guide gives you alll of the actionable tactics to consistently show up in AI results.
The post How Ecommerce Brands Actually Get Discovered In AI Search appeared first on Backlinko.
Read more at Read More
SEO never stands still, and neither do we here at Yoast. In our November 2025 edition of the SEO Update by Yoast, our principal SEOs, Carolyn Shelby and Alex Moss, broke down the latest shifts in search, structured data, and AI. Whether you’re running an e-commerce store, managing a content-heavy site, or just keeping up with Google’s ever-changing rules, this edition highlights what actually matters.
Google is refining its search results, phasing out certain structured data features, including FAQ snippets and COVID-19 updates. But that doesn’t mean you should strip structured data from your site. It still plays a role behind the scenes, especially for AI retrieval, and could make a comeback later.
For online stores, the message is clearer than ever: product schema is non-negotiable. Search Engine Journal’s Matt Southern explains that Google’s new AI shopping tools, such as agent-based checkout and side-by-side comparisons, require that your product data be complete, consistent, and easily visible. That means no hiding key details behind tabs or toggles. If it’s not easily crawlable, Google’s AI won’t use it.
Search Console got a few useful upgrades this month. Query Groups now clusters search terms by topic instead of individual keywords, making it easier to spot content gaps and adjust your strategy. Brand Query Filters help distinguish between branded and non-branded searches, which is handy for tracking misspellings or seasonal trends.
Custom Annotations, previously only available in GA4, now allow you to log site changes directly in Search Console. This is great for connecting updates to performance shifts. E-commerce sites also get a small win with shipping and return details, which can now be added without a Merchant Center account. It’s still rolling out, so test it carefully to avoid missteps.
AI continues to reshape search, and Google’s AI Overviews play a significant role in this transformation. Search Engine Roundtable’s Barry Schwartz’s story on Robby Stein from Google emphasizes that these overviews draw from clear, structured content, such as headings, lists, and direct summaries. Word counts don’t matter as much as clarity and extractability.
The downside? According to Danny Goodwin, in Search Engine Land, AI Overviews have slashed organic click-through rates by 61% and paid CTR by 68%. The takeaway isn’t to chase clicks but to optimize for visibility in AI answers. If your content is easy to extract and cite, you’re in a better position.
Beyond Google, ChatGPT’s new SDK enables developers to build apps within the platform, which could be particularly useful for larger companies seeking to streamline AI integrations. Meanwhile, Adobe’s acquisition of Semrush might push the tool toward enterprise users, so smaller teams should watch for pricing changes.
On the WordPress front, version 6.9 introduces the Abilities API to enhance plugin security and interoperability. Meanwhile, Yoast SEO’s Site Kit integration will soon enable Premium users to access Search Console and GA4 data directly within WordPress, providing a handy time-saver.
The next SEO Update by Yoast is scheduled for December 15, 2025, at 4:00 PM CET. Until then, the focus remains on structured data, clear content, and adapting to AI-driven search. For e-commerce sites, this means ensuring that product data is accurate and up-to-date. For content creators, it’s about writing for extractability. And for everyone? Keeping an eye on Search Console’s new tools to stay ahead.
The post SEO Update by Yoast November 2025 edition recap appeared first on Yoast.
Read more at Read More
