For a long time, SEOreporting revolved around dashboards. When a meeting was on your schedule, you’d spend your day preparing by exporting data from Google Search Console, cleaning it in spreadsheets, and layering charts into Data Studio.
Now, AI coding agents are changing that workflow. Instead of the manual work that would previously take hours, you can use tools like Claude Code to surface customized data with polished visuals in just minutes.
Here’s how to turn Google Search Console data into custom reports and speed up your reporting workflow.
What Claude Code can do with GSC data
Claude Code isn’t the same as using Claude in a browser tab. The standard Claude.ai interface works like a regular chatbot. Claude Code, on the other hand, is Anthropic’s terminal-based AI coding assistant.
It still feels conversational, but instead of living in a browser tab, it can interact directly with files, folders, spreadsheets, and scripts on your machine. It can read exported GSC CSV files, process large datasets locally, generate charts and summaries, analyze trends across pages and queries, and ultimately create structured deliverables from raw data.
Claude Code isn’t simply generating text responses like a chatbot. Instead, it’s creating a local reporting environment that behaves like a lightweight software project.
Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.
The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.
Start Free Trial
Get started with
There’s a learning curve
Before you can start building beautiful, custom reports, you’ll need to set up Claude Code. If you’re not an engineer or developer, this process can feel overwhelming at first. There is a learning curve, but don’t give up.
Setup is actually the most time-intensive piece of the process, but it’s a one-time process. Depending on your technical experience, the initial setup may take a couple of hours.
The “reports in minutes” concept really applies after the environment is configured. Once you’re past the initial setup and Claude is connected to GSC, you can run any custom SEO report you want in a matter of minutes.
If you’re in an enterprise environment, this setup process can go faster with a little help from the tech team. If you’re an agency or an SEO consultant, you can always lean on the expertise of in-house developers or engineers or an outside contractor.
Getting started
If you don’t already have one, create an account atClaude.ai. You can sign up with Google, email/password, or enterprise SSO.
Most SEOs using Claude Code for reporting have a paid plan or use Anthropic API access. But you can use a free plan at the time of writing.
Install Node.js
Claude Code runs locally on your machine, so you’ll first need Node.js installed. You can also use it on a Chromebook by activating the Linux subsystem.
For the purposes of this tutorial, I used a Mac.
Next, download the current LTS (Long-Term Support) version. Once installed, you’ll have access to npm, which is used to install Claude Code.
To verify the installation, open Terminal (Mac/Linux) or PowerShell (Windows) and run:
node -v npm -v
If both commands return version numbers, you’re ready to continue.
Install Claude Code
Next, install Claude Code globally:
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
Once the installation finishes, start Claude Code by running:
claude
The CLI will walk you through authentication and connect to your Anthropic account. After that, Claude Code can work directly with local project folders containing exported SEO data, scripts, spreadsheets, and reporting templates.
At this point, you’ll be able to interact with Claude Code in the terminal using commands much like you would with an AI chatbot.
To kick off the workflow, I gave Claude a prompt:
“I have a marketing meeting coming up, and I want to show our performance from Google Search Console.”
One benefit is that Claude now becomes an onboarding assistant. Claude will ask a handful of clarifying questions to get started. For example, during the setup process, Claude asked:
Whether to use a service account or OAuth credentials to access the Google Search Console API.
Which reporting views or marketing priorities mattered most.
Where the reporting project should live locally on the machine.
Which Google Search Console property to connect to.
Claude also asked where the reporting project should live locally.
(As an aside, we prefer to store it inside a dedicated code directory rather than a standard Documents folder because development projects can sometimes run into file permission or syncing issues when stored inside cloud-synced folders like Documents or Desktop.)
Next, I established how the visuals will be built before connecting to GSC.
We like using Observable Framework, an open-source framework for building data apps, dashboards, and reports.
You don’t necessarily need to follow this exact structure; Claude Code is highly customizable, and you’ll settle into what works for you.
And remember: if you’re unsure about any next steps, you can just ask Claude, and it will help guide the setup.
Connecting to GSC
Before Claude Code can start generating reports from live GSC data, you’ll need to connect it to the Search Console API.
This is another technical part of the process, but the good news is that Claude can walk you through much of the setup interactively.
To establish the connection, you’ll need to create a Google Cloud Project (GCP) and configure API credentials.
That setup process typically includes:
Creating a Google Cloud project.
Enabling the Search Console API.
Generating OAuth credentials or API secrets.
Adding those credentials to a local environment file.
In larger organizations, your IT or development team may already manage this infrastructure.
If not, you can still configure it yourself using a standard Google account or Google Workspace account.
Generating reports
Once you’ve finished connecting to GSC, congratulations! You made it through the hardest part. Once setup is complete, your reporting process changes entirely.
You can now focus on the reporting views you want to create, such as:
“Show me the top 10 landing pages that gained traffic this month.”
“Create a chart of declining nonbrand queries over the last 90 days.”
“Compare CTR trends by device type.”
“Show me the top-performing pages from New York last month.”
Claude is now like an on-demand reporting assistant. You simply open the project folder, launch Claude Code, and ask for the charts you need.
In addition, you can be more dynamic in your meetings.
Instead of building a rigid dashboard ahead of time and hoping stakeholders ask predictable questions, you can generate new views dynamically as questions come up.
That means you can walk into a meeting, ask Claude for a completely new chart or segmentation, and generate it in minutes rather than rebuilding an entire dashboard manually.
Now let’s look at some reports you might quickly run before your next meeting.
Here’s an example of a custom SEO performance dashboard generated from Google Search Console data.
While some of these metrics are available inside GSC, building your own report gives you much more flexibility in how trends, comparisons, and supporting metrics are visualized together.
You could also generate a bar chart with YoY rankings, or a heat map of rankings for keywords by month. Both examples are below.
What we like to include in our reporting is a combination of scorecards, time-series charts, year-over-year bar chart comparisons, and heat maps that break down the key drivers behind a metric.
See the complete picture of your search visibility.
Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.
Start Free Trial
Get started with
Claude Code completely transforms SEO reporting
SEO reporting has always been a push and pull between speed and flexibility.
Dashboards are fast once they are built, but they are often rigid. Custom analysis is powerful but historically has been time-intensive.
Claude Code changes everything.
Now you can interact with your GSC data more dynamically, explore new questions as they arise, and create reporting views that would have previously taken hours to build manually.
Once the initial setup is complete, reporting becomes far more adaptable to the needs of you and your stakeholders.
https://i0.wp.com/dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/web-design-creative-services.jpg?fit=1500%2C600&ssl=16001500Dubado Solutionshttp://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.pngDubado Solutions2026-05-19 14:00:002026-05-19 14:00:00How to build custom SEO reports with Claude Code and Google Search Console
SEO is a white-collar job. So does that mean our jobs will be eliminated, too? The answer isn’t as obvious as you might think.
Yes, the world is changing. But if you’ve been doing SEO for a while, you should be used to that by now.
SEOs have always been forced to wear strange combinations of hats: part technical analyst, part content strategist, part UX researcher, part marketer, and part analyst.
I don’t think AI will make SEO expertise obsolete. But it will make shallow SEO obsolete.
The people who thrive will be the ones who understand search behavior, business outcomes, technical systems, content strategy, analytics, and how to turn all of that into better decisions.
The old version of SEO stopped working years ago
I’ve been doing SEO since before there was a word for “SEO.” Every few years, there’s a viral article declaring that “SEO is dead.” One of the first to catch fire was a 2005 article by Jeremy Schoemaker, repeating something he’d heard from Jason Calacanis.
We know the reality. SEO never died. But over the years, it’s changed a lot.
Look at this screenshot of a Google search for [flowers] in 2007 versus the same search in 2026.
Google’s “flowers” SERP in 2007, when a No. 1 organic ranking controlled most of the visible page.
Google’s “flowers” SERP in 2026, where organic listings compete with ads, shopping results, local packs, AI features, and other search elements.
This example is near and dear to my heart because I wrote that title tag in 2007. I was fortunate enough to lead SEO at 1-800-Flowers at a time when a No. 1 organic ranking meant significant traffic and revenue.
Twenty years later, their team has maintained the No. 1 organic ranking. However, today it’s so buried on the SERP that I wonder whether it gets any clicks at all.
This phenomenon isn’t limited to searches for “flowers.” Search for any competitive head term these days, and chances are you’ll see the organic result buried.
Is SEO “dead”? That really depends on your definition of “SEO.”
If your definition is “getting to the top of Google organic search” by spending your whole day writing title tags, then yeah, SEO is pretty much dead. It has been for a long time.
If your definition of SEO is understanding that people are looking for your goods and services, understanding their needs, answering their questions, and meeting them wherever they go to find information, then your journey as an SEO expert — or whatever you eventually decide to call yourself — is only beginning.
Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.
The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.
Start Free Trial
Get started with
Why true SEO experts are uniquely positioned to thrive
There’s one phenomenon I’ve noticed with AI, not just in SEO, but across every industry. You might have noticed it too.
On social media, you’ll see a lot of AI-generated videos. The vast majority are silly “look what I can do with AI” videos. You see them, maybe press “Like,” and then forget about them. But the ones with staying power are made by people who understand filmmaking: pacing, framing, lighting, composition, camera movement, editing, sound design, and how to build toward an emotional payoff.
In other words, even though everyone can generate videos with AI now, the differentiator is no longer how “cool” the visuals are. It’s how skillfully creators use AI as a tool to achieve their vision.
There’s an analogous situation happening with SEO and AI. I’ve noticed a lot of people typing simplistic prompts and, like Neo in “The Matrix,” declaring, “I know SEO.”
What these folks don’t realize is that SEO is a lot more than title tags, and it was never just about reverse-engineering search engines. It was always about reverse-engineering the human brain, drawing on knowledge and experience across keyword lists, user behavior, content strategy, technical systems, analytics, persuasion, UX, and business outcomes.
When others are typing simplistic prompts into their LLMs, SEO experts will be having deep conversations with their LLMs, teaching them, challenging them, and finding ways to get the best out of them. Those who excel in this new world won’t be the ones who have all the answers. They’ll be the ones who have the right questions.
While it’s still early, and I’m convinced we haven’t even scratched the surface of ways to use LLMs in SEO, here are just a few ways I’ve been using AI in my SEO work to make it more efficient and effective than ever.
1. Performing SEO basics with unprecedented efficiency and effectiveness
I’m generally not a fan of AI-generated long-form writing. You end up with generic, inauthentic slop that, in the words of Shakespeare, is “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
I predict that a year from now, most people will be able to spot the clear signs of AI-generated copy: not just obvious tells like excessive use of em dashes and repetitive phrasing (“That’s not X … it’s Y!”), but a lack of authentic personality and stories.
Metadata is one of the places where I don’t mind AI assistance because its job isn’t to invent original thought. It’s to compress the page’s value, intent, and positioning into the right format for the right surface.
The big mistake I see people making with AI-generated metadata is that their prompts are far too generic: “Write a title tag for this page.”
A seasoned SEO knows the goal isn’t to create a “pretty title tag.” It’s to create the most effective title tag possible for human, search engine, and AI discovery. It takes into account various search intents, brand positioning, competitor gaps, conversion drivers, and practical space limitations.
AI opens up new opportunities that weren’t practical before. Not many people know that ideally, your title tag, Open Graph tag, and Twitter card should be distinct from one another because they’ll be shown to different audiences on Google, Facebook, and X. And it took me a few tries to remind AI that title tag length isn’t based on character count, but on pixel width.
Those “in the know” will start using AI to generate everything: title tags, meta description tags, OG tags, Twitter cards, and the right structured data.
Someone without SEO experience will write generic prompts and wonder why their perfectly polished title tags aren’t doing anything for them a year from now.
2. Turning SEO recommendations into dev-ready tickets
One “edge” I’ve had throughout my career is the ability to translate vague marketing goals into precise technical requirements developers can actually execute.
But as technology has become more complex, I found myself hitting my own limits. I understood the principles of coding, but had a hard time articulating exactly what I needed developers to do. Googling hardly ever helped because I’d just find high-level articles written by consultants, some of whom clearly didn’t understand it either.
A practical example is modern React or single-page app architecture, where a page may look complete to users while key SEO content is assembled after load from JavaScript rather than appearing as crawlable HTML.
In the past, I might’ve written a vague recommendation like “we need more crawlable content on this page,” forcing my poor developer to figure out what that means.
With AI, I can turn that into a real implementation ticket: grounding the LLM in the site’s tech stack, translating the SEO need into concepts like server-side rendering, hydration, DOM content, and crawlable links, and adding examples, test cases, edge cases, and acceptance criteria.
The point isn’t to become a React engineer. It’s to communicate SEO requirements in a way that developers can execute without forcing them to think too much about it. Trust me, your developer will thank you.
3. Mining GSC, GA4, and Semrush or Ahrefs data for actual user needs
The holy grail of SEO has always been to read your users’ minds and create content that meets their needs. Anyone who’s spent a lot of time with SEO data knows that there are enormous amounts of insights locked within this data. The first problem is unlocking them. The second problem is getting them into a format that will get people to pay attention.
In the past, I would literally lock myself in a room with a giant spreadsheet open on my screen. I’d go through search terms one by one, categorizing and clustering them, and, if I was lucky, end up with a handful of insights days later.
I might start with a list of 30,000 keywords and get through maybe a few hundred before getting completely exhausted. And when I’d present my insights, along with my giant pivot table, to stakeholders, they’d nod their heads, and then everyone would forget about them.
LLMs are changing the game. You can simply upload data from GSC, GA4, and Semrush and Ahrefs, along with your own business and market insights, and then simply ask your LLM questions.
Here are just a few recent examples of analyses I’ve done for my clients. These would once have taken days or weeks. Now I can get to a strong first pass in minutes.
Analyze our GSC keyword data and organize the keywords into topical clusters. Which topics do we clearly have a “right to own” in Google’s eyes?
Review our top competitors and uncover keywords within this topical neighborhood that they rank for but we don’t. What kind of content do we need to “break in”?
Surface GSC queries that get lots of impressions but few clicks. What improvements can we make to our titles, snippets, or positioning to drive more clicks?
Examine organic landing pages that attract a lot of traffic but fail to convert. What is the search intent behind the keywords driving traffic to these pages, and how can we improve conversion?
Find keywords where we’re in “striking distance” of stronger rankings. What additional content do we need to create or adjust to push us to the top?
Analyze the queries people type into our on-site search. What are examples of searches they might perform on Google or prompts they might use in LLMs when looking for this information?
There are literally an endless number of questions you can ask. I didn’t present these as sample prompts because they’re thought starters. While you’ll probably get a decent answer, the real value from AI comes only when you:
Dig deep into specific concepts, pages, and keywords.
4. Prototyping page layouts, content modules, and more
Something else I’ve found LLMs can do really well is generate a solid wireframe of a page or page module that you can pass on to your web designer and developer. But this is another area where the quality of the output depends almost entirely on the quality of your prompt and the context you provide the LLM.
Most people will simply type “design me a web page,” perhaps with a few “wish list” items they’d like to see. AI may produce something that looks “complete” on the surface, perhaps a hero section, a list of benefits, some FAQs, and a call to action (CTA). But when executed, it’ll feel lifeless, generic, and disconnected from the actual business problem.
The better approach is to ground the LLM with as much background information as possible. This doesn’t need to include every SEO report, but rather the ones that provide the highest-quality signals, such as the ones we discussed above: topic clusters, competitor gaps, conversion data, and on-site search data. Add other useful information like sales objections, customer reviews, your brand’s unique value propositions, and a clear explanation of what the page needs to accomplish.
With proper context, AI can help lay out something that transcends a generic landing page. For example, it can propose a strong hero section with suggested wording, recommendations for CTAs, section order, comparison tables, proof blocks, FAQs based on real questions, trust elements, and paths for different stages of intent.
Remember that it works in reverse, too. Upload a screenshot of an existing page, either yours or your competitor’s, tell the LLM what your goals are for the page, and ask it to critique the page.
AI can also open up other SEO opportunities that have previously been roadblocks.
Want to do A/B testing? Tell the LLM the hypothesis you want to test, and have it come up with variants for you.
Want to prototype a simple interactive tool? Provide your requirements, provide the underlying data, and see what your LLM can do.
In some cases, it can go beyond a static mockup and produce a working prototype that a developer can evaluate, harden, and turn into production code.
Your edge as an SEO is knowing what information to feed the model, what problems the page actually needs to solve, and which ideas are strategically useful versus just AI-generated decoration.
The one thing that I haven’t seen AI do very well yet is generate professional-quality design and production-quality code. But everything up to that point is at your fingertips now.
5. Making analytics useful again
As I’m sure it was for many of you, July 1, 2024, was a dark day for me. That’s when Google shut down Universal Analytics and forced us all onto GA4.
Since it was called Urchin, I’d all but mastered UA. Then one day, all of my reports and dashboards were simply gone. And I had no interest in spending another decade on a learning curve just to recreate reports that they’d once given me by default.
But with the arrival of LLMs, you can simply ask the LLM to walk you through building whatever report you want.
The first report I had to re-create was the on-site search report, one that’s inexplicably missing from GA4. I wrote my own prompt to walk me through creating this, but for the purposes of this article, I had ChatGPT write the prompt:
Act as a senior GA4 analytics consultant.
I want to rebuild a useful onsite search report in GA4/Looker Studio. GA4 does not provide the same dedicated Site Search report that Universal Analytics had, but I can use the `view_search_results` event, the `search_term` parameter, and any custom parameters needed.
Create a practical, implementation-ready plan that covers:
1. How to confirm onsite search tracking is working.
2. Recommended event name and parameters, including which should be registered as custom dimensions.
3. How to track searches when the site does not use URL query parameters.
4. The most useful report sections, including:
- total searches
- unique searchers
- top search terms
- zero-result searches
- refined or repeated searches
- searches followed by exits
- searches followed by conversions
- searches by page, device, and user type
5. Step-by-step instructions for building the report in GA4 Explore and Looker Studio.
6. A QA checklist to make sure the data is accurate.
Keep the answer concise, practical, and usable by both a marketer and a developer.
The key to writing these prompts, or prompts that generate prompts, is including the phrase “step by step.” One of the nice things about AI is that it doesn’t judge.
Take as long as you need, ask it to break the setup down into steps as granular as you like, and feel free to ask “dumb” questions. It’ll oblige enthusiastically.
You can imagine what this opens up. One of the classic issues with SEO analytics is that all too often, they’re merely vanity metrics.
Conversions, clicks, impressions, and rankings may look impressive at first, but eventually the dreaded “so what” question will arise. Who really cares if you see impressions and rankings growing like wildfire if your revenue isn’t increasing?
This is where you want to ask your AI to help you tie data to business performance.
Which unbranded keywords are actually driving revenue?
Which are leading to soft conversion goals like email signup, account creation, or pricing page visits?
Which search queries bring in engaged visitors who come back later through brand search, direct traffic, or email?
Again, the sky’s the limit. You can build a report or dashboard to answer just about any question your stakeholders have, provided you’re collecting the right data, and if you’re not, AI can help you create tickets for your web developer to collect that data.
See the complete picture of your search visibility.
Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.
Start Free Trial
Get started with
The work is changing. The need for expertise isn’t.
Like I said, this is only scratching the surface of how AI can help transform the work we do as SEOs.
But let’s get to the question everyone is really asking: Is your job safe?
I don’t have a crystal ball. But one thing is pretty clear to me. Not every SEO job will survive unchanged. Big companies will likely cut roles. Teams will likely get smaller. A lot of tactical work that used to require specialists may be done faster, cheaper, or “good enough” by someone using AI.
If your value is limited to tasks that AI can perform on command, there may be challenges ahead.
But if your value is understanding customers, interpreting search behavior, connecting data to business outcomes, translating strategy into execution, and helping companies become more findable, useful, and trusted, then AI isn’t the end of your career. It may be the best leverage you’ve ever had.
And there’s another reason I’m optimistic. The same AI disruption hitting SEO is hitting every other white-collar profession, too. If large companies do lay off significant numbers of talented people, many of those people aren’t just going to disappear from the economy.
Some will start businesses. Some will finally pursue ideas they’ve had in their heads for years. Some will use AI to build prototypes, launch products, test markets, and create companies in ways that would have required far more capital and staff just a few years ago.
That should give us hope.
Many of the great companies we know today started with little more than a few people, an idea, and the willingness to figure things out as they went. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, Bill Gates and Paul Allen, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Michael Dell, and many others did not begin with massive corporations behind them. They began with ideas, persistence, and the tools available to them at the time.
If they were able to accomplish what they did with their tools, imagine what a new generation of entrepreneurs will be able to do with AI.
Maybe you’ll be one of those entrepreneurs. Or maybe your role will be helping one of them turn their ideas into businesses people can actually discover, understand, trust, and choose.
Either way, the products, services, brands, and businesses built with AI will still need to be found. They will still need to explain why they matter. They will still need to earn attention, authority, and trust.
https://i0.wp.com/dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/web-design-creative-services.jpg?fit=1500%2C600&ssl=16001500Dubado Solutionshttp://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.pngDubado Solutions2026-05-19 13:00:002026-05-19 13:00:00How AI may increase the value of SEO expertise
As part of the WTS Global Week celebrations, join Yoast and Women in Tech SEO for a special online coffee chat celebrating two incredible community milestones: 7 years of WTS and 16 years of Yoast.
SEO has always been more than algorithms, rankings, and updates; it’s built through people sharing ideas, supporting one another, and learning together. In this relaxed and inspiring session, Carolyn Shelby, Samah Nasr, and Areej AbuAli will reflect on the power of community in shaping careers, building confidence, and helping the SEO industry grow into a more collaborative and inclusive space.
Have you ever wondered where SEO professionals really learn beyond courses and documentation? Or how people find mentors, supportive communities, and opportunities to grow in the industry? Maybe you’re just starting out and trying to figure out which resources are actually worth your time.
Together, we’ll talk about how community creates learning opportunities, opens doors for newcomers, and provides the support people need to grow in SEO. Expect practical tips, career insights, honest experiences, and advice for those looking to deepen their involvement in the industry and connect with others in the space.
The session will include a 30-minute community chat followed by a live Q&A with attendees, giving everyone the chance to join the conversation and share their perspectives.
Bring your coffee or tea, questions, and stories; we’d love for you to be part of it.
http://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.png00Dubado Solutionshttp://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.pngDubado Solutions2026-05-19 10:22:012026-05-19 10:22:01Yoast x WTS Global: SEO is built in community
You prompt ChatGPT with something, and suddenly your brand name shows up in the response. Sounds like a win, right? But before you share the screenshot with your team, there’s one important question to ask: Is your brand being cited or mentioned?
As AI search and LLM-driven discovery continue to grow, understanding the difference between AI brand mentions and AI citations is becoming increasingly important for SEO and brand visibility. In this article, we’ll break down what AI brand mentions are, how they work, and how they differ from citations.
Since we know you’re excited to celebrate your AI visibility win, let’s get straight into it.
AI brand mentions occur when an AI tool references your brand in responses, while citations support the information with sources
Understanding the difference between mentions and citations is crucial for SEO and brand visibility
To improve AI mentions, create clear, structured, and extractable content that addresses user queries directly
Brands need to build authority through trusted mentions across various platforms to enhance visibility and acceptance by AI systems
Both mentions and citations are crucial; mentions help AI identify your relevance, while citations reinforce your credibility
What is an AI brand mention?
An AI brand mention happens when an AI tool references your brand name inside a generated response, recommendation, comparison, or summary. The brand mentions can be either linked (also known as explicit mention) or unlinked (also known as implicit mention).
Here’s an example of ChatGPT’s response to, “What are some of the best WordPress SEO plugins?”
ChatGPT mentions Yoast SEO explicitly and implicitly
AI can mention brands in different conversational contexts depending on the user’s query and intent. Here are some of the most common ways AI-generated responses include brand mentions:
Direct recommendations
This happens when AI directly suggests a brand, product, or service as a possible solution to the user’s query. For instance, these mentions typically appear in recommendation-style prompts where users are actively seeking options or tools.
Comparisons
AI may mention brands while comparing products, services, features, pricing, or use cases. In such cases, the brand becomes part of a broader evaluation or decision-making discussion.
Examples within answers
Sometimes, AI uses brands as examples to explain concepts, trends, workflows, or industry practices. These mentions help provide context and make the explanation easier for users to understand.
Contextual references
Brands can also naturally appear in broader discussions about a topic or industry. These mentions are less promotional and more about establishing topical relevance within the conversation.
How do LLMs decide what to mention?
Large language models don’t “choose” brands the way a human would. They generate responses based on patterns, probabilities, and signals they’ve learned over time. When a brand shows up in an AI answer, it’s usually because multiple underlying factors align.
LLMs learn from vast datasets that show how often certain brands appear alongside specific topics.
When people repeatedly discuss a brand in connection with a particular use case, the model develops a strong association. Over time, this increases the likelihood that the brand will appear in responses to similar queries.
But it’s not just frequency. Context matters just as much.
What topics is the brand linked to?
What problems does it appear to solve?
What other terms show up around it?
Brands that appear across multiple contexts build deeper, more flexible associations. Those with limited or inconsistent mentions struggle to surface.
2. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
Many modern AI systems extend beyond their training data using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). This is where things get more dynamic, and where many brands either gain visibility or disappear entirely.
At a basic level, here’s what changes:
Without RAG, the model answers using only what it learned during training
With RAG, the system first retrieves relevant information from external or live sources, then passes both the user query and the retrieved content into the model
The model then combines this new information with its existing knowledge to generate a more accurate, up-to-date response.
Descriptive diagram of RAG and training data by Amazon AWS
When a user submits a query, the retrieval system acts as a gatekeeper. It scans indexed sources, such as web pages, documentation, articles, and forums, to find content that best matches the query.
3. Context and semantic understanding
LLMs don’t rely on exact keyword matches. They interpret intent. When someone asks a question, the model maps it to broader concepts and then surfaces brands that fit those meanings.
For example, a query about “tools for remote teams” might connect to:
Collaboration
Async work
Team communication
Workflow management
LLMs are more likely to surface brands that consistently associate themselves with these ideas, even if users don’t use the exact phrase. This is where entity clarity becomes critical. If your brand is described differently across sources, the model struggles to understand what you actually do.
Overall, it’s not just about what you say, but how your content connects to related topics. Therefore, linking your brand to relevant concepts, use cases, and terminology helps AI systems understand when your brand is relevant. This is where it helps to semantically link entities to your content, so those relationships are clearer and easier for models to pick up.
4. Authority and cross-source validation
LLMs don’t rely on a single source. They validate information by comparing patterns across multiple sources and weighing the trustworthiness of those sources. When a claim appears consistently across many independent platforms, the model is more confident in including it. If it shows up in only a few places, that confidence drops.
AI systems combine semantic understanding with retrieval signals to assess which sources to trust. This typically includes:
Source credibility: Well-known publications, academic content, government sites, and recognized organizations are prioritized
Citation patterns: Sources that are frequently referenced by others are treated as more authoritative
Recency: More recent information is often weighted higher, especially for fast-changing topics
Transparency: Content with clear authorship, dates, and references is considered more reliable
Authority in AI is about being consistently referenced across credible, independent sources. This is why PR, earned media, and third-party mentions play a bigger role in AI visibility than they traditionally did in SEO.
5. Relevance to the query
Before anything else, the model evaluates fit. Even highly authoritative or frequently mentioned brands won’t appear unless they clearly match the user’s intent, such as the use case, audience, or problem being solved.
In simple terms, if your brand isn’t a strong answer to the query, it won’t be included.
When surfacing a brand in answers, AI models may include nuances like:
Beginner vs advanced users
Budget vs premium solutions
Niche vs general use cases
Modern AI systems have shifted from traditional keyword matching to query understanding. They use Natural Language Processing (NLP) to understand the “why” behind the text strings. If explained technically, gen AI converts text queries (prompts) into vectors that allow it to find semantic similarity and return relevant answers.
6. Sentiment and human feedback (RLHF)
LLMs don’t rely solely on training data or web sources. They are continuously improved through human feedback, a process known as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
In this process, human evaluators review model responses and guide them based on whether the answers are:
Helpful
Accurate
Safe
Trustworthy
How does this affect brand mentions? If a brand is consistently associated with negative sentiment, the model may learn to avoid or deprioritize it. On the other hand, brands that appear in neutral or positive contexts across sources are more likely to be included.
In this way, RLHF acts as a layer that refines raw data signals, aligning brand mentions more closely with quality, trust, and user expectations.
Tips to get more mentions
Getting your brand mentioned in AI answers isn’t a completely new discipline. It closely overlaps with what many now call LLM SEO. If you’ve already been working on visibility, authority, and content quality, you’re on the right track.
Here are a few practical ways to improve your chances of being mentioned:
Publish definitive, extractable resources
Create content that is easy for AI systems to understand and reuse. This means clear definitions, structured explanations, and direct answers rather than long, vague introductions.
For example, a well-structured guide that clearly defines “what is customer data management” with concise sections is far more likely to be picked up than a generic blog post that buries the answer halfway through.
Address evaluative queries
AI assistants often respond to questions like “best tools for X” or “which platform should I choose?” If your content directly addresses these comparisons, you increase your chances of being included.
Like a comparison page, for example, Yoast vs. Rank Math, that explains when your product is better suited than alternatives, it gives the model a clear context to recommend you.
Strengthen authority signals
Mentions across trusted, independent sources significantly improve your visibility. This includes being featured in industry publications, contributing expert insights, or earning mentions in reviews and comparisons.
For example, a brand cited in multiple reputable blogs and reports is more likely to be surfaced than one that only publishes content on its own website.
Keep cornerstone pages current
Freshness plays a key role, especially for topics that evolve quickly. Regularly updating the content of your key pages signals that your information is reliable and up to date. For example, a “best tools” page updated every few months with current data is more likely to be retrieved than one that hasn’t been touched in years.
Broaden entity clarity
Your brand should be consistently described across your website and external platforms. This helps AI systems clearly understand what you do and when to mention you. For example, if your product is always positioned as “project management software for remote teams,” that repeated clarity strengthens your association with that use case.
AI brand mentions vs AI citations
Before sharing the comparison, let me give you a brief overview of citations. AI citations are references that AI systems and search engines include to support the answers they generate.
Citations usually point to a specific source, such as a webpage, report, or article, and credit the source of the information. In many cases, a response can include both a brand mention and a citation at the same time.
ChatGPT’s response mentions brands and cites resources to back its answer
Next, let’s see how they are different.
Aspect
AI brand mention
AI citation
Definition
Your brand name appears within the AI-generated response
AI attributes information to your content, often with a link or reference
Format
Mentioned naturally in text, no link required
URL, footnote, or inline source reference
What it signals
Brand awareness and category relevance
Authority, credibility, and trustworthiness
Impact
Builds mindshare and keeps you in the consideration set
Acts as proof of expertise and can drive traffic
Traffic potential
Indirect, through increased brand recall
Direct, via clickable or attributed sources
Frequency
More common across most AI responses
Less common and more competitive
Where it appears
Across most LLMs, even without live web access
More common in systems with retrieval or web access
How to optimize
PR, earned media, third-party mentions, community presence
Create citation-worthy content, structured data, original research
Mentions get you in the conversation. Citations make you the source.
Mentions make the AI familiar with your brand. Citations make the AI willing to vouch for it.
In short, the most effective strategy is to optimize for both.
Do citations still matter?
Yes, citations still matter, but they are no longer a standalone strategy.
AI systems still use citations as supporting signals to validate information, confirm credibility, and discover trustworthy sources. When multiple reputable websites reference the same brand or source, it reinforces trust and helps AI systems verify the information’s reliability.
While both mentions and citations matter, mentions currently carry more weight for relevance and AI visibility. Citations still help reinforce authority and trust, but mentions give AI systems richer contextual signals about where a brand fits, how often it appears in conversations, and why it matters within a topic.
How to achieve citations and mentions both?
Brands that consistently appear in relevant conversations while publishing credible content are more likely to earn both mentions and citations. Here are some easy strategies that you can follow:
Create mention-worthy content
The easiest way to earn both mentions and citations is to publish content people naturally want to reference. This includes thought leadership, original research, unique insights, industry commentary, and practical resources that add real value. When your content contributes something new to the conversation, it becomes easier for journalists, creators, communities, and AI systems to pick it up.
Focus on contextual brand mentions
AI systems pay attention to how and where your brand is discussed. Mentions across community discussions, industry blogs, PR coverage, podcasts, forums, and trend-based conversations help reinforce your relevance within a topic. The goal is not just visibility, but also appearing consistently in meaningful, context-rich discussions.
Build credibility for citations
If you want more citations, credibility becomes essential. AI systems are more likely to reference content that demonstrates strong expertise and trustworthiness. This is where principles like E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) become important.
AI brand mentions vs. citations: FAQs
While mentions help AI systems recognize and associate your brand with specific topics, citations strengthen trust and authority by validating your content as a reliable source.
The reality is that both work together. Brands that consistently appear in relevant conversations while publishing credible, high-quality content are far more likely to strengthen their AI visibility over time.
Here are some common questions around AI brand mentions and citations:
Are citations and backlinks the same?
Not exactly. Backlinks are traditional SEO links that point from one website to another, mainly to help search engines understand authority and ranking signals. AI citations, on the other hand, are references AI systems use to support or validate the answers they generate. While citations can include links, their primary role is attribution and trust rather than passing ranking value. For a deeper understanding, read AI citations vs backlinks.
If a brand is mentioned, will it be cited too?
Not always. A brand can be mentioned in an AI response without being directly cited as a source. This usually happens because AI systems often recognize brands through repeated contextual mentions across the web, even when they are not using that brand’s content as the primary supporting source for the answer.
Why should businesses focus on both mentions and citations from AI?
Mentions and citations support different aspects of AI visibility. Mentions help AI systems understand where your brand fits within a topic, while citations reinforce authority and trust.
How to track both mentions and citations for my brand?
Tracking AI visibility manually across platforms can quickly become difficult. Tools like Yoast SEO AI+ help brands monitor how they appear across AI-driven search experiences. With AI Brand Insights, you can track mentions, citations, and overall brand presence across AI platforms to better understand where your visibility is growing and where opportunities exist to improve your AI brand visibility using Yoast AI Brand Insights.
http://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.png00Dubado Solutionshttp://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.pngDubado Solutions2026-05-19 06:48:132026-05-19 06:48:13What are AI brand mentions? And how are they different from citations?
An AI visibility report tracks how often your brand is cited across AI-generated responses. Think of it as a companion to your SEO reporting, not a replacement for it.
Your tracked prompt set is the foundation of every number Writesonic shows you. If you don’t understand what those prompts cover, you’ll misread your data.
Portfolios organize your tracked URLs by content type. Get this set up early and keep it updated as new content goes live.
Citation data is inherently noisy. A single-period dip rarely means anything. A sustained two-to-three-month trend does.
The Action Center is where the quick wins live. Use it to find pages with citation visibility gaps and start closing them.
Here’s something that should keep marketers up at night: your buyers are researching purchases in ChatGPT and Perplexity, and most brands have no idea whether they’re showing up in those answers.
That gap is exactly what an AI visibility report is built to close. It tells you how often your brand gets cited in AI-generated responses, which pages are driving those citations, and where competitors are outperforming you in the moments that matter most.
Writesonic has one of the more practical toolsets for building this kind of reporting. But I want to make one thing clear: I’m not trying to do a review of the platform. This is a working guide for content teams that need to get this reporting off the ground and want to understand what the data actually means before they put it in front of a client or a leadership team.
Why AI Visibility Reporting Matters for Marketing Teams
Buyers don’t just Google things anymore. A growing portion of them open ChatGPT, type a question, and act on whatever comes back. Salesforce research found that 41 percent of consumers used AI tools as part of their research process in 2024. That number has only grown since.
If your brand isn’t being cited in those responses, you’re losing potential customers.
AI visibility reporting helps you understand not just if you appear, but which topics you’re being cited for, how that’s changing over time, and who’s beating you in the answers your buyers are reading.
Where this fits in your stack matters, too. AI visibility reporting isn’t a replacement for organic search analytics or conversion data, but an added signal. This tells you whether AI systems find your content credible enough to surface. Teams that treat it as a complement to their larger organic strategy get more out of it than those trying to use it standalone.
The two questions it should help you answer: Are we showing up where buyers are actually looking? And if not, what do we fix first?
Understanding Your Prompt Set Before You Report on Anything
Every number in Writesonic traces back to your tracked prompt set. These are the specific questions the platform monitors across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI tools to see whether your content gets cited in the response.
Get this wrong, and everything downstream looks worse than it is.
The platform assigns default topic labels to clusters of prompts. Those labels are usually broad. A marketing blog running this kind of reporting might see their prompt topics labeled “content marketing” and “digital marketing.” Both are accurate but they are closely related terms that cover a huge swathe of subtopics. Due to the lack of specificity, you may encounter issues building and reporting on AI visibility if you only rely on the pre-populated topic list.
Here’s what works better: export the full prompt list, drop it into an AI tool, and ask it to summarize the underlying themes, intent types, and audience categories. That same marketing agency’s list of 100 prompts might actually break into much more specific themes, like Organic & search visibility, Paid media & SEM, and Email & conversion.
The screenshot above is a portion of Claude’s output when I asked it to perform this exercise. As you can see, there’s a lot more information here to guide our content reporting (and creation). Not only do we have a clearer idea of the GEO content pillars we’re tracking against, but also the audience and intent for each category.
This type of output influences how you read everything else. If you find that your prompt set skews heavily toward one audience, your citation numbers for content aimed at a different audience will look artificially low. You can’t treat this as losing ground. You’re just being measured against prompts that page was never written for.
The practical rule: only report on content that genuinely aligns with your tracked prompt themes. Flagging low citation share on a page that serves a completely different audience creates confusion in client reports. Know your prompt set first, then interpret your data.
To pull the list, navigate to the Prompts section and use the export option. Fifteen minutes of AI-assisted theme analysis is worth doing before you touch anything else.
Setting Up Portfolios to Track Your Content Over Time
Portfolios are folders. They allow you to organize the URLs you’re tracking by content type so you can report on categories rather than hunting down individual pages every time you pull a report.
Create them early and keep them simple. At minimum, you want separate portfolios for blog posts, core website pages, and comprehensive guides. If your client has distinct product lines or service areas, break those out too.
The part that really matters is the workflow. As soon as a new piece of content goes live, add the URL to its portfolio. Teams that skip this step spend far too much time during reporting cycles searching for pages that should have been tracked from day one. Make it part of the implementation process: publish, review, then add to portfolio.
One thing worth knowing: portfolios aren’t limited to your own content. You can add competitor URLs and track their citation performance in the same view. That’s useful when you need to show a client exactly where a competitor is outpacing them on a specific topic, without having to cross-reference separate reports mid-meeting.
How to Report on a Single Piece of Content
The path is: Overview > Citations > Content Performance. Set your date range and filter by URL slug.
You’ll mainly want to look at Citation Count or Citing Answers, which are how many times that page was cited across all tracked prompts in the selected period.
If you look at Citation Share, the number may appear small. That’s because this view measures a single page’s citation contribution across your entire prompt set, not just the prompts that are relevant to what the page covers. A tightly focused blog post will naturally have limited citation surface area relative to the full prompt universe you’re tracking.
Second, pay attention to the prompts the page is and more importantly, is not being cited for. You can see the full prompt set by clicking on the number in the ‘Answers citing your content’ tab. In this case, I clicked on the 100.
You’ll then be taken to the All Prompts & Answers view, where you can see which prompts and platforms are surfacing your content and which ones are not.
If a page is ranking well for some prompts but missing others that closely match its content, those gaps are actionable. Adding a structured FAQ section or a more direct answer to a specific question can sometimes close them — and that’s something Writesonic can help you generate.
Third, be careful with month-over-month comparisons. A single dip is not a signal. LLM citation patterns shift constantly as models update and competitive content changes. Before treating a decrease as a problem, remove the comparison period and look at a three-to-four-month trend line instead. A trough followed by recovery is a very different story than a genuine sustained decline.
When you do see a real downward trend, don’t touch the content first. Cross-reference with your SEO data and generative engine optimization metrics. Often, the issue is external, like a model update, and editing the content won’t fix it.
Reporting Content Categories with Portfolios
Another useful feature inside Writesonic is the ability to report on content performance at the portfolio level, not just the page level.
To access it, navigate to Overview > Page Tracker > Portfolios. If you’ve organized portfolios by content type, topic cluster, service area, or funnel stage, this view gives you a meaningful way to evaluate how a group of pages is collectively performing in AI-generated answers.
This matters because page-level reporting only tells you so much. When you’re managing a content program at scale, you need to be able to say, “our informational content about hotel amenities is being cited regularly” or “our location-based pages are getting picked up but not driving brand mentions.” Portfolios let you have that conversation at the category level, which is how most content strategies are built and how most stakeholders think about performance.
Two metrics worth understanding here are citation share and visibility contribution.
Citation share tells you what percentage of all AI answers cite at least one page from that portfolio. Think of it as reach for that content category. A 1.6% citation share, like the example above, means those pages appeared in roughly 660 out of 40,000 tracked answers. Reported at the portfolio level, this becomes a concrete benchmark you can share: how often AI tools are drawing from this type of content, and how that’s trending over time.
Visibility contribution is a layer deeper. It measures the percentage of your brand’s total AI visibility that comes from pages in that portfolio being cited alongside a brand mention. It tells you which content categories are driving brand recognition in AI answers, not just traffic or citations. A portfolio with strong visibility contribution means your content and your brand name are appearing together in AI responses, which is the outcome you’re optimizing for.
Together, these two metrics help you go beyond vanity reporting and start answering the questions clients and stakeholders actually care about: Is this content working? Are people seeing our brand name? Which content categories should we double down on, and which need attention?
If a portfolio has solid citation share but low visibility contribution, AI tools are referencing those pages frequently but not associating them with your brand. That’s a signal to look at how clearly your brand is represented within the content itself. If a portfolio is underperforming on both, that’s a prioritization conversation. And if a portfolio is driving strong numbers on both, that’s proof-of-concept worth scaling.
Understanding Volatility: What’s Signal and What’s Noise?
LLM citation data is noisy by nature. This isn’t a Writesonic-specific problem. It’s how these models work. AI citation drift, where sources shift in and out of responses as models retrain, re-rank sources, or adjust sampling, has been documented across platforms. Research from SISTRIX shows citation sources can change significantly week over week, even when the underlying content is untouched.
One data point tells you almost nothing. The question is always whether you’re looking at a trend or a snapshot.
For example, look at the graph above. This shows the number of citations a page has over a two-month span. As you can see, there are several peaks and valleys, even within the span of a few days. However, if you were to draw a trend line, the result would be relatively flat and even increase a bit towards the end of the second month.
That’s why it’s important to remember that a one-period decrease is not a call to action. A consistent downward pattern over two to three months is worth digging into. Before you touch any content, pull SEO performance and AI Overview impression data for the same window. If organic traffic is stable and AI Overview appearances are flat, the Writesonic dip is most likely a model or sampling artifact.
This is worth saying explicitly to leadership and clients. AI visibility reporting is newer and messier than traditional SEO reporting. Setting that expectation upfront builds credibility. Trying to explain unexpected volatility after the fact does the opposite.
What Writesonic Can’t Tell You
Transparency on limitations makes reporting more credible, not less.
As mentioned earlier, Writesonic tracks a defined prompt set, not every AI query relevant to your category. Your citation numbers reflect performance within that sample. That distinction matters when someone asks why results look lower than expected. The tracked set may simply not cover the full range of queries where your content performs well.
Other things to be aware of include:
Prompt volume isn’t search volume. AI platforms don’t publish query data the way Google does. Estimating how many times people search specific prompts in platforms like ChatGPT requires multiple data sources, a scoring methodology, and sampled user data. That means LLM prompt volume should always be taken with a grain of salt, no matter what AI visibility platform you’re using.
Citation change versus buyer behavior. A drop in citations might reflect a model update or a competitor adding a stronger page. It doesn’t necessarily mean fewer buyers are encountering your brand. Separating those two things requires additional data sources like conversion tracking, qualitative research, or broader competitive analysis.
Competitive visibility outside the tracked set. You can see how competitors are performing within your prompt set. You can’t see how they’re performing in AI queries you aren’t tracking at all.
For each gap, the fix is the same: layer in additional signals. Use organic performance, GEO and AEO analysis alongside broader competitive research to paint the full picture. Writesonic works best as one input among several, not as a standalone source of truth.
Using Quick Wins to Improve AI Visibility Now
The Action Center is where the most immediately actionable reporting lives. Navigate to Action Center > Boost Content Visibility > Refresh existing content for AI visibility to find existing pages where competitors are being cited more often than you for the same prompts.
These are your quick wins. The pages themselves usually aren’t the problem; they’re just missing specific structural elements that AI models tend to pull from. Common recommendations from the platform include FAQ sections, comparison tables, and explicit key takeaway sections. These signal to large language models (LLMs) that a page directly answers a specific question and improves your chances of being cited.
Writesonic will generate draft versions of those elements for you. Use them as a starting point, not a final output. Editorial judgment still applies. Not every recommendation fits every page. A conversion-focused product page probably shouldn’t get a sprawling FAQ section that complicates the user journey, even if the data suggests it would improve citation share.
This module is particularly useful at campaign kick-off. Teams can surface concrete page improvements in the first few weeks while the broader strategy is still being developed, giving clients something tangible early.
New Content Opportunities in the Action Center
Beyond refreshing existing pages, the Action Center also identifies topics where competitors are earning citations, and you have no content covering them at all.
Navigate to Action Center > Boost Content Visibility > Create content inspired by competitors winning in AI citations for this view. The recommendations here are about where to create new pages or blog posts, not about tweaking what you have. If a competitor is consistently cited on a topic that aligns with your tracked prompt themes and your site has nothing on it, that’s a real gap in your AI visibility coverage, and a direct input for your content calendar.
Review this section at least quarterly alongside your standard keyword research. The two often point in the same direction.
FAQs
What KPIs matter for executive AI visibility reporting?
Lead with citation share trend direction over a rolling 90-day period, not raw citation counts. Raw numbers require too much context without supporting data. Showing category-level performance for priority topics, plus specific wins and gaps, lands better in executive reporting than a single number that needs a two-paragraph explanation.
How do you create reports showing brand visibility in AI platforms?
Use Writesonic’s Content Performance and Page Tracker views to pull citation data by URL and topic. Present directional trends and be explicit about what your prompt set covers.
How do you report AI search visibility to leadership?
Frame AI visibility as one signal alongside organic search, not a standalone metric. Show specific wins (pages gaining citation share) alongside gaps, and tie recommendations directly to business priorities. Explain volatility upfront so a single-period dip doesn’t derail an entire reporting session.
Where can you find AI visibility reports with sentiment analysis?
Writesonic includes sentiment indicators alongside citation data. You can dig deeper into how your brand is being discussed on LLMs by navigating to Overview, then the Sentiment dashboard under Brand Visibility.
Conclusion
Most teams that struggle with AI visibility reporting don’t have a data problem. They have an interpretation problem. The numbers look strange, the volatility is hard to explain, and it’s difficult to know what to act on.
Writesonic helps with that, but only if you come in with the right expectations. Know what your prompt set covers. Organize your portfolios from the start. Read citation data as a directional trend, not a precise scorecard. Use the Action Center to find the generative engine optimization improvements most likely to move the needle quickly. Teams that build these habits now will be ahead of the curve as AI-driven search grows and the tools mature.
http://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.png00Dubado Solutionshttp://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.pngDubado Solutions2026-05-15 19:00:002026-05-15 19:00:00How to Create an AI Visibility Report with Writesonic
Keyword volume is one signal, not the full story. It tells you that demand exists, but not where it lives, how it’s being answered, or whether your brand is part of the conversation.
The Ubersuggest keyword tool and Answer the Public now pull data from Google, Bing, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Amazon, giving you a multi-platform view of where your audience is actually searching.
AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini generate answers, not link lists. Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility feature tracks whether your brand appears in those answers and how your visibility compares to competitors.
Ubersuggest’s global keyword data lets you identify regions where demand already exists for your product or service, so you can prioritize expansion instead of guessing.
The highest-value content opportunities sit at the intersection of strong multi-platform demand and low brand visibility. Knowing where that gap is tells you exactly where to focus.
Search is no longer a single-channel game. For a long time, SEO meant one thing: get found on Google. But Google’s own SVP Prabhakar Raghavan noted that roughly 40 percent of young people now turn to TikTok and Instagram for searches instead of Google, a number that’s only likely to grow over time.
Add ChatGPT, Gemini, YouTube, and other rising channels on top of that, and the picture becomes clear: keyword volume alone can’t tell you where demand actually lives, how it’s being answered, or whether your brand is part of the conversation.
The good news is that Ubersuggest is a great tool to help you adapt to this shift. I’ll cover here how Ubersuggest keyword ideas data actually surfaces, and how to layer multiple signals into a strategy built for the way search works today.
What Keyword Data Actually Tells You (And What It Doesn’t)
Keyword research is still the foundation of any solid content strategy. Search volume tells you how much interest exists around a topic. Keyword difficulty helps you gauge how competitive that space is. Search intent tells you what kind of content actually fits the query. All of that is genuinely useful, and none of it is going away.
But traditional keyword data was built for a world where Google was the only game in town. That world doesn’t exist anymore.
A user today might search “best email marketing tool” on Google, watch comparison videos on YouTube, follow threads on Reddit, scroll TikTok for creator recommendations, and then ask ChatGPT for a final opinion before choosing a product. Each of those touchpoints is a moment of demand. Most keyword research tools only capture one of them.
The practical result: you can have a well-optimized piece ranking on page one for a target keyword and still be invisible to a significant chunk of your audience. That’s not a traffic problem you can fix by adjusting your meta tags.
Two questions worth asking before you build any content plan:
Where does demand for this topic actually live across platforms?
Is my brand showing up when people ask AI tools about this subject?
Ubersuggest addresses both. Here’s how each capability works.
How the Ubersuggest Keyword Tool and Answer the Public Surface Multi-Platform Demand
If you used Answer the Public a few years ago, it was a visualization tool that pulled suggestions from Google Autocomplete. Useful, but limited to one platform.
That’s no longer what it is. Answer the Public (now integrated with the Ubersuggest keyword generator) pulls keyword and hashtag data from Google, Bing, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. That’s a meaningful shift. You’re not just seeing what people type into a search bar anymore. You’re seeing what they watch, hashtag, and shop for across the platforms where they actually spend their time.
Here’s what that looks like in practice. Enter a broad keyword like “marketing” and select a platform.
Switch to Instagram and you’ll see the hashtags your audience is actively using around that topic. Switch to TikTok and you get a keyword wheel showing what creators and users are searching within the app.
You can also compare how results shift over time, which tells you whether interest in a topic is growing or fading on a specific platform. That matters for content planning. A keyword might have modest Google search volume but strong TikTok traction, which is a signal that short-form video would outperform a blog post for that topic. You’d never see that from Google data alone.
For content teams, this changes the planning conversation. Rather than asking “what should we write?” you start asking “what format and platform does this topic actually call for?” That’s a more useful question, and it leads to content that actually reaches people where they’re searching. For a closer look at using the two tools together, see how to use Answer the Public with Ubersuggest.
The AI Search Layer: What Ubersuggest’s AI Visibility Data Shows You
Multi-platform keyword data covers where demand lives across traditional and social search. AI Search Visibility covers something different: whether your brand shows up when AI tools answer questions in your category.
The distinction matters more than it might seem. When someone asks ChatGPT “what’s the best CRM for a small sales team?” they don’t get ten blue links to evaluate. They get a generated answer. Your brand is either mentioned in that answer or it isn’t. There’s no page-two for AI responses.
This is the core challenge of AI search: it’s not about ranking, it’s about being cited. And right now, most brands have no systematic way to know whether they’re being cited at all.
Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility feature is built to solve that. It runs repeated queries across AI platforms, aggregates the results, and gives you a clear, data-backed picture of how often your brand appears in AI-generated responses for your most important topics. One AI response is a data point. Hundreds of responses is a pattern.
The feature surfaces four key metrics:
Brand Visibility %: How often your brand is mentioned across aggregated AI responses for relevant prompts.
Industry Rank: Where you sit relative to competitors in your space.
Top Prompts table: The specific questions and prompts where your brand does and doesn’t appear in AI answers.
Competitor Visibility trend chart: How competitors’ AI presence is changing over time.
A note on variability: AI responses are inherently inconsistent. Ask the same question twice and you may get a different answer, different brand mentions, or a different level of detail. That’s normal, and it’s exactly why aggregating data across hundreds of repeated queries gives a more reliable read than spot-checking a single response on a given day.
One of the most actionable outputs from this feature is the Top Prompts table. It tells you which specific AI search prompts are driving brand visibility in your category, and which prompts your competitors are dominating without you. Those gaps are your content brief.
Ubersuggest’s AI visibility features are built to cut through that noise, aggregating responses at scale so your visibility score reflects a real pattern rather than a single snapshot. This is the piece of Ubersuggest keyword research that most marketers haven’t built into their workflow yet. The window to get ahead of competitors here is still open, but it won’t be for long.
Going Global: Using Ubersuggest Data Across Markets
Expanding into new markets is one of the highest-leverage growth moves a brand can make, and one of the most expensive to get wrong. NP Digital now operates in 19 countries, and that growth wasn’t built on guesswork. It came from identifying where demand already existed and going after the regions with the clearest signal first.
Ubersuggest’s global keyword data makes that analysis accessible without a research team. Type any keyword into the Ubersuggest keyword tool, run a search, and filter by country. You’ll see where search volume for your topic is concentrated across global markets.
The insight here is about prioritization. You don’t need to tackle every market at once. You need to find the markets where demand already exists for what you offer, because those are the ones where content and campaigns can work with the grain of existing intent rather than trying to create it from scratch.
Layer in the city-level targeting from AI Search Visibility and you get a second useful data point: not just where people are searching, but where your brand is (or isn’t) showing up in localized AI responses. A market might have strong keyword volume and competitors with high AI visibility, or it might have strong volume and very little AI presence from anyone, which is a wide-open opportunity. That combination turns global expansion strategy from a gut call into a data-backed decision.
For most brands, the low-hanging fruit is closer than it looks. Start by running your core keywords through the global filter and see which regions surface demand you’re currently not serving.
How to Put It All Together
The data points covered above aren’t meant to live in separate tabs. Here’s how to run them as a single workflow.
Step one: map where demand lives.
Use the Ubersuggest keyword tool and Answer the Public to build a multi-platform picture of your topic. Pull keyword volume from Google and Bing, but don’t stop there. Check TikTok and Instagram data for hashtag and creator trends. Check YouTube for video search volume. Check Amazon if your category has a commerce angle. You’re mapping where your audience is actively searching, not just where you’ve historically published.
Step two: audit your AI search presence.
For the topics where you’ve found strong demand, run them through AI Search Visibility. Which prompts is your brand appearing for? Which ones are competitors owning? The Top Prompts table will show you both. If your competitors are consistently cited for a topic your brand should own, that’s a content and PR gap. If nobody in your space is showing up consistently, that’s a first-mover opportunity.
Step three: close the gaps.
The highest-value content opportunities sit where demand is real and brand visibility is low. Those are the topics to build content around, earn citations for, and develop PR relationships that put your brand in front of journalists and creators who influence what AI models learn over time. Publishing more isn’t the goal. Publishing the right content, on the right platforms, on the topics where you’re currently invisible, is.
This framework is repeatable. Run it quarterly as your AI search visibility data evolves and as platform demand shifts. The brands that build this into their routine workflow will compound their advantage over time. For a broader foundation on getting the most out of the platform, the Ubersuggest guide is the right place to start.
FAQs
How accurate is Ubersuggest?
Ubersuggest pulls from multiple sources, including Google’s keyword planner data, to provide search volume estimates. Like any keyword tool, these are estimates rather than exact figures. For most strategy decisions, they’re directionally reliable. For AI Search Visibility, reliability is stronger because the tool aggregates data across hundreds of repeated AI queries rather than relying on a single response, which smooths out the inherent variability of AI-generated answers.
How does Ubersuggest work?
Ubersuggest combines keyword research, site audit tools, competitive analysis, and AI visibility tracking in one platform. For traditional keyword data, it pulls from search engine databases to surface volume, difficulty scores, and related terms. For AI visibility, it runs repeated queries across tools like ChatGPT and Gemini, aggregates the results, and shows how often your brand appears in those AI-generated responses compared to competitors.
How do I use Ubersuggest for keyword research?
Head to app.neilpatel.com, enter a keyword, and review the volume, keyword difficulty score, and related term suggestions. From there, you can filter by country for global demand data, use the Content Ideas tab to see which topics are already performing well in your space, or switch over to Answer the Public to pull platform-specific data from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and Amazon alongside traditional search engines.
Conclusion
To do marketing well in today’s world, you need to optimize for multiple platforms and regions.
SEO is no longer just a “Google” game. You must optimize for YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, ChatGPT, and all the other platforms your users use.
On top of that, you should look to expand globally.
Now, it’s too hard to tackle every country, but go after the low-hanging fruit first. What other countries have demand for your products and services? Those are the countries worth considering to move into next.
http://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.png00Dubado Solutionshttp://dubadosolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/dubado-logo-1.pngDubado Solutions2026-05-13 19:00:002026-05-13 19:00:00Ubersuggest Keyword Ideas: What the Data Actually Tells You
Google is bringing Gemini into Google Ads dashboards, aiming to make data analysis more interactive, visual and accessible.
What’s happening. Google Ads is rolling out a new Dashboards feature that lets advertisers explore performance data using charts, graphs and tables, powered by Gemini.
Users can customise views simply by typing prompts, with the dashboard updating in real time based on their queries.
Why we care. Data analysis in Google Ads has traditionally required manual setup and navigation across reports.
This update shifts that workflow toward a more conversational model, where advertisers ask questions and get instant visual answers.
Zoom in. Dashboards will display key metrics like impressions, clicks, video views and cost, alongside visual breakdowns of performance across devices, audiences and campaign types.
The goal is to give advertisers a clearer, faster way to understand what’s happening in their accounts.
What to watch. How widely advertisers adopt prompt-based reporting, and whether this reduces reliance on custom-built reports and external analytics tools.
OpenAI is making a clearer push into e-commerce advertising by letting retailers generate ads directly from their product catalogues inside ChatGPT.
What’s happening. Retailers can now connect product feeds to ChatGPT, allowing the platform to automatically create ads using product names, images and attributes, instead of building campaigns manually.
The ads themselves don’t change for users. They still appear beneath responses and are clearly labelled as sponsored.
Why we care. Running ads at scale has been a major barrier for e-commerce brands in ChatGPT.
This update removes that friction, especially for retailers with large inventories, by turning product catalogues into ready-to-run ad campaigns.
Zoom in. Brands set rules for which products to include, then let the system generate ads automatically.
It mirrors how shopping campaigns work on platforms like Google, where structured feeds power both organic and paid visibility.
What’s new. Previously, product data could inform ChatGPT’s answers, but it couldn’t be used for advertising.
Now, that same data powers both, effectively linking organic presence with paid campaigns.
Between the lines. This signals a shift in how OpenAI plans to monetise shopping.
Rather than taking a cut of transactions, it’s moving toward capturing ad budgets already spent on platforms like Amazon and Meta.
What they’re saying. Industry analyst Debra Aho Williamson called feed-based automation “table stakes,” noting that ChatGPT’s edge lies in serving ads based on conversational intent rather than traditional signals.
Ad tech partners like StackAdapt say the setup integrates easily with existing feeds, lowering adoption barriers.
Cost-per-action models are also reportedly in development, pointing to a deeper push into performance advertising.
What to watch. Expect more retailers to test ChatGPT as a performance channel as setup becomes easier. The bigger question is whether conversational intent can drive conversions as effectively as traditional search or marketplace signals.
When a website migration goes wrong, the consequences can be a devastating loss of organic traffic and revenue. But what happens when the damage isn’t immediately visible? What if Google is silently deprioritizing your content, page by page, until your traffic has evaporated?
This is the case study of how a multinational media organization lost 90% of its traffic following a domain migration, and how addressing a seemingly harmless technical issue — soft 404 errors — helped unlock suppressed traffic potential across 13 country-specific domains.
While this case study examines events from 2021–2023, the lessons learned remain timeless and directly applicable to any site facing indexing challenges today.
The catastrophic drop
In January, 2022, the Brazilian localization of a cryptocurrency news website completed a domain migration. After the transition, traffic didn’t just drop — it plummeted. Comparing December 2021 to December 2022, both sessions and pageviews had fallen approximately 90% year-over-year.
According to Google Search Console data, the old domain (xx.com.br) was receiving between 15,000 to 25,000 clicks per day before migration. After migrating to the new subdomain structure (br.xx.com) in January, traffic collapsed and never recovered. It stabilized at around 2,000 to 4,000 clicks per day — a sustained loss that persisted for over a year.
The migration coincided with three major Google algorithm updates in June 2021: the core update, spam update, and page experience update. While these updates caused the expected temporary volatility, the Brazilian site showed no signs of recovery.
Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up.
The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need.
Start Free Trial
Get started with
The migration problem: More than just redirects
Domain migrations typically show an initial traffic drop as Google recrawls and reassesses the site. That’s expected.
Normally, this traffic recovers within weeks or months. In this case, there were no signs of recovery.
The root cause? The old domain continued to be crawled by Google long after the migration.
According to the team’s analysis, proper redirect implementation and technical migration protocols weren’t fully implemented, causing Google to split its crawl budget between two domains rather than consolidating authority on the new one.
In mid-August 2022, after addressing the migration issues with the SEO and IT teams, there was a subtle uptick — a peak of 12 clicks and 37 impressions on Aug. 29, 2022. While modest, this represented the first signs of recovery and indicated that Google was beginning to properly recognize the new domain.
Using Facebook Prophet forecasting on pre-migration data, the team estimated that without the migration issues, the Brazilian site would have exceeded 2 million monthly clicks by early 2022. Instead, it was generating a fraction of that traffic.
Understanding the indexing bottleneck
While fixing the migration was critical, it revealed a deeper problem affecting not just Brazil, but all 13 of the site’s country domains: a massive indexing backlog.
Google’s page processing follows four stages:
Crawl: Google discovers and reads pages.
Render: The page code is rendered.
Index: Pages wait in a queue to be stored in Google’s index.
Rank: Pages appear in search results with rankings.
The Brazilian site was taking an average of 2 minutes for Google to crawl new articles (an acceptable amount of time for a news site). However, indexing these articles was taking 24 hours. For time-sensitive cryptocurrency news, this delay was catastrophic. By the time the site’s articles were indexed, the news cycle had already moved on.
The scale of the site migration problem: 513,000 crawled, but not indexed, pages
In January 2023, Google Search Console revealed alarming indexing issues across all domains:
Crawled – currently not indexed: 513,369 pages (Brazil alone)
Soft 404: 1,193 pages and growing rapidly
Alternate page with proper canonical tag: 2,532 pages
Discovered – currently not indexed: 524 pages
The “Crawled – currently not indexed” issue was particularly concerning. These were pages that Google had successfully crawled but chose not to index. This typically happens when Google considers a page low-quality, duplicate, or not worth the crawl budget.
Upon investigation, the team discovered that converter pages (e.g., “/usd-to-thor?amount=250” or “/eur-to-signaturechain?amount=1000”) were being automatically generated at scale. These thin content pages were consuming Google’s crawl budget, causing it to deprioritize the entire domain.
The soft 404 time bomb
While fixing the migration and removing low-quality pages was important, the most insidious issue was the proliferation of soft 404 errors.
A soft 404 occurs when a page returns a 200 (success) status code but actually contains no meaningful content — essentially a “page not found” that doesn’t properly signal its emptiness to search engines. Unlike hard 404s, which clearly communicate that the page doesn’t exist, soft 404s confuse search engines and waste crawl budgets.
The data revealed this wasn’t isolated to Brazil. Soft 404 errors were growing exponentially across multiple domains:
xx.com (main site): 90,400 affected pages
es.xx.com (Spain): 17,700 pages
kr.xx.com (Korea): 15,400 pages
fr.xx.com (France): 15,100 pages
de.xx.com (Germany): 8,010 pages
Specifically for France, Google Search Console data showed a direct correlation: As soft 404 errors began accumulating in October 2022, total crawl requests dropped from 60,000–70,000 per day to just 20,000–30,000 per day. Google was literally giving up on crawling the site efficiently.
The crawl budget crisis
The concept of crawl budget is critical to understanding why soft 404s matter so much.
Search engines allocate a finite amount of resources to crawl each website. If Google wastes time crawling broken, empty, or duplicate pages, it has less capacity to discover and index your valuable content.
For news sites publishing dozens of articles daily, this creates a vicious cycle: New content doesn’t get indexed quickly, engagement drops, Google further reduces crawl budget, and the problem compounds.
In January 2023, Google was wasting significant resources crawling pages that provided no value. This meant:
Slower indexing of new, timely content.
Reduced visibility in search results.
Lost traffic opportunities.
Degraded domain authority in Google’s eyes.
The systematic fix: Addressing root causes of site migration problems
Starting Jan. 31, 2023, the team implemented a comprehensive technical SEO remediation plan focused on three priorities:
Urgent: Soft 404 resolution
The team identified the source of soft 404 errors and implemented proper HTTP status codes. Pages that truly didn’t exist began returning proper 404 or 410 status codes. Pages with content were fixed to render properly.
High priority: Crawl budget optimization
Removed or noindexed automatically generated currency converter pages.
Implemented stricter URL parameter handling.
Used robots.txt to block low-value URL patterns.
Set up proper canonicalization for variant pages.
Medium priority: Core Web Vitals
While user experience metrics were important, the team recognized that fixing indexing issues would have a more immediate impact than optimizing page speed. Core Web Vitals improvements were addressed, but not at the expense of resolving indexing bottlenecks.
Weeks after implementing the fixes, the impact was measurable:
Brazil (br.xx.com)
Crawled – currently not indexed: Dropped from 513,000 to 220,000 pages (57% reduction).
Soft 404 errors: Reduced from 1,193 to 370 pages (69% reduction).
Traffic recovery: Visible upward trajectory starting early 2023.
Germany (de.xx.com)
Indexed pages: Increased from ~150,000 to 370,748.
Total clicks: Rose from ~8,000/day average to sustained 12,000-15,000/day.
Google Discover traffic share: Jumped from 42% to 58%.
Poland (pl.xx.com)
Indexed pages: Grew from ~100,000 to 135,556.
Total clicks: Increased significantly with multiple traffic spikes above 30,000/day.
Google Discover traffic share: Rose from 15% to 86%.
Spain (es.xx.com)
Google Discover clicks: Increased from ~450,000 to 912,721 total.
Traffic distribution: Discover now represents 65% of total traffic.
All domains combined
By late April 2023, soft 404 errors across all domains had dropped from a peak of approximately 120,000 pages to under 20,000 — an 83% reduction.
Most remarkably, the biggest traffic gains came from Google Discover — Google’s personalized content recommendation feed. As indexing health improved, Google began trusting the domains enough to recommend their content more aggressively to users.
The Core Web Vitals paradox
Interestingly, improvements to Core Web Vitals (page speed, interactivity, and visual stability) showed mixed results:
Desktop improvements:
Germany: 25.1% → 97.1% good URLs
Poland: 20.5% → 68.9% good URLs
Korea: 15% → 84.6% good URLs
Mobile challenges:
Brazil: 0% → 0% (no improvement)
Argentina: 0% → 0%
Thailand: 0% → 0%
Korea: 93.4% → 0.5% (severe regression)
Turkey: 94% → 0% (severe regression)
The team’s hypothesis: Core Web Vitals performance is heavily influenced by regional factors like CDN proximity, server location, network quality, and device capabilities. Countries with poor mobile infrastructure or greater server distance showed minimal improvement despite technical optimizations.
This reinforced an important lesson: Not all technical SEO issues affect all markets equally. A one-size-fits-all approach would have wasted resources by optimizing for metrics that couldn’t improve without infrastructure investment, while the real wins came from addressing indexing fundamentals.
Key technical SEO lessons
1. Indexing issues trump almost everything else
No amount of content quality, backlinks, or page speed optimization matters if Google isn’t indexing your pages. Before optimizing what’s visible, ensure your content is actually being indexed.
2. Soft 404s are silent killers
Unlike hard 404s that immediately alert you to problems, soft 404s quietly accumulate, degrading your crawl budget until you notice traffic declining. Regular monitoring of Google Search Console‘s “Pages” report is essential.
The Brazilian site’s migration issues persisted for over a year. A proper migration protocol should include:
Complete redirect mapping verification.
Confirmation of old domain deindexing.
Search Console property setup and validation.
Multi-week monitoring of both old and new domains.
Crawl rate and indexing speed tracking.
4. Crawl budget is real for high-volume sites
For sites publishing 10+ articles daily across multiple domains, crawl budget optimization is not optional. Automatically generated pages, URL parameters, and infinite scroll implementations can quickly consume available crawl resources.
5. Regional differences demand regional solutions
Core Web Vitals data showed that Brazil, Argentina, and Thailand couldn’t achieve the same performance as European markets. Instead of forcing uniform standards, prioritize fixes tailored to each market that can actually succeed.
6. Google Discover is increasingly critical
For news and timely content publishers, Google Discover accounts for a substantial share of traffic in some markets. But Discover only promotes content from sites Google trusts — and technical issues like soft 404s directly erode that trust.
Practical site migration implementation guide
For teams facing similar challenges, here’s a systematic approach:
Weeks 1-2: Audit and prioritize
Access Google Search Console for all properties.
Export “Page indexing” reports for all domains.
Identify the scale of each issue category.
Calculate the trend (growing, stable, or declining).
Prioritize based on issue volume and growth rate.
Weeks 3-4: Fix soft 404s
Sample 20–30 URLs from the soft 404 report.
Identify common patterns (empty pages, broken functionality, etc.).
Implement proper HTTP status codes (404, 410, or fix the content).
Validate fixes in Google Search Console.
Monitor for reduction in affected pages.
Weeks 5-8: Address crawled but not indexed
Analyze URLs to identify auto-generated content.
Implement robots.txt rules or noindex tags for low-value pages.
Review and strengthen internal linking to important pages.
Ensure proper canonicalization across variants.
Request reindexing via Search Console for key pages.
Weeks 9-12: Monitor and optimize
Track indexing coverage weekly.
Monitor crawl rate changes in Search Console.
Measure organic traffic recovery.
Identify remaining outlier issues.
Document learnings for future migrations.
Calculating the traffic loss from migration issues
How significant was this suppressed traffic opportunity?
According to Facebook Prophet forecasting based on pre-migration data, the Brazilian site was trending toward 20,000+ daily clicks. At the time of fix implementation in early 2023, it was receiving approximately 5,000–7,000 daily clicks. This represented roughly 6575% of potential traffic being suppressed — or conversely, the site was only achieving 25–35% of its forecasted potential.
More broadly, across all 13 domains, the soft 404 and indexing issues prevented approximately 500,000 pages from being indexed. Given average click-through rates for indexed pages, this represented millions of potential monthly impressions and hundreds of thousands of potential clicks being left on the table.
See the complete picture of your search visibility.
Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform.
Start Free Trial
Get started with
Technical debt compounds
The most important lesson from this case study is that technical SEO issues don’t stay static — they compound. What starts as a few hundred soft 404s becomes thousands, then tens of thousands.
Google’s response isn’t immediate punishment, but gradual deprioritization. Traffic doesn’t crash overnight; it bleeds slowly.
For the Brazilian site, it took over a year to recognize the full scope of the problem. During that year, competitors filled the gap, topical authority eroded, and recovery became exponentially harder.
The good news? Once identified and systematically addressed, these issues are fixable. Within 12 weeks of implementing the remediation plan, every domain showed measurable improvement. Some saw traffic double or triple.
Technical SEO is often seen as unglamorous maintenance work. But as this case demonstrates, it’s the foundation upon which all other optimization rests. Before worrying about AI-generated content, E-E-A-T signals, or the latest algorithm update, ensure Google can actually find, crawl, and index your content.
Because the best content in the world is worthless if it’s trapped outside search engine indexes.
Google is set to automatically link Google Ads accounts with associated YouTube channels — according to communications sent to multiple advertisers — tightening the connection between video engagement and ad performance.
What’s happening. Advertisers have received notices that, from June 10, 2026, Google Ads accounts that aren’t already linked to a YouTube channel will be automatically connected.
The update removes the need for manual linking and ensures advertisers can access video engagement data and targeting features by default.
Why we care. Linking a YouTube channel unlocks deeper insights and more advanced targeting options — something many advertisers either overlook or delay setting up.
By automating the process, Google is effectively making video data a standard part of campaign optimisation.
Zoom in. Once linked, advertisers can access organic video metrics, including view counts, directly within Google Ads.
They can also build audience segments based on how users interact with their YouTube content — from video views to channel engagement.
What else. The integration allows advertisers to track “earned actions,” such as subscriptions or additional views driven by ads, and use those engagements as conversion signals.
That creates a clearer picture of how video campaigns influence user behaviour beyond just clicks.
What to watch. How advertisers adapt their measurement strategies once organic and paid video data are combined, and whether this leads to broader use of engagement-based conversion tracking in campaigns.
Bottom line. Google is making YouTube data harder to ignore — turning automatic linking into a default step for better targeting, measurement and performance.
First spotted. Several advertiser reported getting the comms from Google, including Founder of JXT Group, Menachem Ani, founder of PPC News Feed Hana Kobzová, and PPC Specialist Arpan Banerjee.